<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rsp</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Научно-практическая ревматология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Rheumatology Science and Practice</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1995-4484</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1995-4492</issn><publisher><publisher-name>IMA-PRESS, LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14412/1995-4484-2011-1456</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">rsp-1288</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ЛЕЧЕНИЕ ОСТЕОПОРОЗА В РЕАЛЬНОЙ КЛИНИЧЕСКОЙ ПРАКТИКЕ: ЧАСТОТА НАЗНАЧЕНИЯ И ПРИВЕРЖЕННОСТЬ ТЕРАПИИ В ТЕЧЕНИЕ ПЕРВОГО ГОДА ПОСЛЕ ОСТЕОПОРОТИЧЕСКОГО ПЕРЕЛОМА</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE: FREQUENCY OF PRESCRIPTIONS AND THERAPY ADHERENCE WITHIN THE FIRST YEAR AFTER OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Добровольская</surname><given-names>О. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Dobrovolskaya</surname><given-names>O. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Торопцова</surname><given-names>Н. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Toroptsova</surname><given-names>N. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Никитинская</surname><given-names>О. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Nikitinskaya</surname><given-names>O. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Демин</surname><given-names>Н. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Demin</surname><given-names>N. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>epid@irramn.ru</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>epid@irramn.ru</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2011</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>06</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><issue-title>№5 (2011)</issue-title><fpage>24</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Добровольская О.В., Торопцова Н.В., Никитинская О.А., Демин Н.В., 2011</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Добровольская О.В., Торопцова Н.В., Никитинская О.А., Демин Н.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Dobrovolskaya O.V., Toroptsova N.V., Nikitinskaya O.A., Demin N.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://rsp.mediar-press.net/rsp/article/view/1288">https://rsp.mediar-press.net/rsp/article/view/1288</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель: оценить частоту назначения противоостеопоротических препаратов в реальной клинической практике и приверженность пациентов лечению в течение года после перенесенного малотравматичного остеопоротического перелома (МОП). Материал и методы. Проанкетированы 192 человека старше 50 лет (средний возраст 66±8 лет), перенесших переломы различных локализаций в результате падения с высоты собственного роста. Оценка назначения терапии и приверженности лечению осуществлялась через 4 и 12 мес после МОП. Результаты. 105 (55%) пациентов получали терапию, в том числе 80 (73%) человек принимали только препараты кальция и витамина D, 9 (8%) – кальцитонин, 15 (14%) – бисфосфонаты и 5 (5%) – стронция ранелат. В то же время 87 (45%) человек не получали никаких противоостеопоротических препаратов в течение года после перелома. Во время всего периода наблю- дения получали лечение 42% опрошенных, прервали его в течение первых 4 мес после перелома – 18% лиц, а начали терапию через 4 мес и позже (в среднем через 6,5 мес) – 40% больных. Среди не получавших лечение в 49% случаев причина была в отсутствии рекомендаций травматолога или врача первичного звена. Среди принимавших препараты в 89% случаев лечение было рекомендовано специалистами Центра профилактики остеопороза НИИР РАМН и лишь в 11% – врачами первичного звена. Заключение. Наше исследование показало, что после перенесенного МОП пациенты не получали адекватную противоостеопоротическую терапию, при этом у 49% пациентов отсутствовали соответствующие рекомендации травматологов или врачей первичного звена. Частота назначения патогенетических препаратов для лечения остеопороза значимо повышалась при наблюдении в специализированном центре по профилактике остеопороза. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Objective: to estimate the frequency of prescription for antiosteoporotic agents in real clinical practice and treatment adherence within a year after experienced low-trauma osteoporotic fracture (LOF). Subjects and methods. A questionnaire survey was made in 192 subjects aged over 50 years (mean age 66±8 years) who had sustained fractures at different sites after a fall from standing height. Therapy and its compliance were assessed 4 and 12 months after LOF. Results. One hundred and five (55%) patients received therapy, including 80 (73%) took only calcium preparations and vitamin D; 9 (8%), 15 (14%), and 5 (5%) patients had calcitonin, bisphosphonates, and strontium ranelate, respectively. At the same time, 87 (45%) subjects were given no antiosteoporotic drugs for a year after fracture. Throughout the follow-up, 42% of the respondents received treat- ment; 18% interrupted it within the first 4 months after fracture, and 40% started therapy 4 months or later (mean 6.5 months) after it. The reason for the absence of treatment was no recommendations by a traumatologist or primary care specialists in 49% of cases. Among those taking the drugs, treatment was recommended by the specialists of the Osteoporosis Center, Research Institute of Rheumatology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, in 89% of cases and by primary care specialists in only 11%.Conclusion. The study indicated that after LOF, the patients did not receive adequate antiosteoporotic therapy, at the same time 49% had no respective recommendations made by traumatologists or primary care physicians. The frequency of prescription for pathogenic agents for the treatment of osteoporosis was considerably increased during patient observation in a specialized osteoporosis center. </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>остеопоротические переломы</kwd><kwd>приверженность лечению</kwd><kwd>минеральная плотность кости</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>osteoporotic fractures</kwd><kwd>treatment adherence</kwd><kwd>bone mineral density</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Johnell O., Kanis J. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:1726-33&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kanis J., Oden A., Johnell O. et al. The components of excess mortality after hip fracture. Bone 2003;32(5):468-73&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Меньшикова Л.В., Храмцова Н.А., Ершова О.Б. и др. Ближайшие и отдаленные исходы переломов проксимального отдела бедра у лиц пожилого возраста и их медико-социальные последствия (по данным многоцентрового исследования). Остеопороз и остеопатии 2002;1:8-11.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ершова О.Б., Семенова О.В., Дегтярев А.А. Результаты проспективного изучения исходов переломов проксимального отдела бедра. Остеопороз и остеопатии 2000;1:9-10.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Лесняк О.М. Фармакоэкономика средств профилактики и лечения остеопороза. В кн.: Руководство по остеопорозу. М.: Бином. Лаборатория знаний, 2003;469-81&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Guidelines for clinical care. Osteoporosis: prevention and treatment. University of Michigan health system, 2010 Jul;15 p&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Papaioannou A., Morin S., Cheung A.M. et al. 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 2010;182:1864-73.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Остеопороз. Диагностика, профилактика и лечение. Клинические рекомендации. Под ред. О.М. Лесняк, Л.И. Беневоленской. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2010;272 с.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simonelli C., Chen Y., Morancey J. et al. Evaluation and management of osteoporosis following hospitalization for low-impact fracture. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18(1):17-22.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Schurink M., Hegeman J.H., Kreeftenberg H.G. et al. Follow-up for osteoporosis in older patients three years after a fracture. Netherlands J Med 2007;65(2):71-4.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Еstrand J., Thorngren K.-G. One fracture is enough- Experience with a prospective and consecutive osteoporosis screening program with 239 fracture patients. Acta Orthopaedica 2006;77(1):3-8.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Follin S.L., Black J.N., McDermott M.T. Lack of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in men and women after hip fracture. Pharmacotherapy 2003;23(2):190-8.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jennings L.A., Auerbach A.D., Maselli J. et al. Missed Opportunities for Osteoporosis Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Hip Fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58(4):650-7&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Premaor M.O., Pilbrow L., Tonkin C. et al. Low rates of treatment in postmenopausal women with a history of low trauma fractures: results of audit in a Fracture Liaison Service. Q J Med 2010;103:33-40.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Roerholt C., Eiken P., Abrahamsen B. Initiation of anti-osteoporotic therapy in patients with recent fractures: a nationwide analysis of prescription rates and persistence. Osteoporos Int 2009;20(2):299-307.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: WHO, 2003.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shu A.D.-H., Stedman M.R., Polinski J.M. et al. Adherence to Osteoporosis Medications After Patient and Physician Brief Education: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Manag Care 2009;15(7):417-24.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gregory P.C., Lam D., Howell P. Osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture: how rates vary by service. South Med J 2010;103(10):977-81. 19. Rabenda V., Vanoverloop J., Fabri V. et al. Low incidence of anti-osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(10):2142-8.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Еstrand J., Thorngren K.-G., Еkesson K. et al. 3-year follow-up of 215 fracture patients from a prospective and consecutive osteoporosis screening program - Fracture patients care. Acta Orthopaedica 2008;79(3):404-9.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kuo I., Ong C., Simmons L. et al. Successful direct intervention for osteoporosis in patients with minimal trauma fractures. Osteoporosis Int 2007;18(12):1633-9.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Johnell O., Kanis J. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:1726-33&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kanis J., Oden A., Johnell O. et al. The components of excess mortality after hip fracture. Bone 2003;32(5):468-73&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Меньшикова Л.В., Храмцова Н.А., Ершова О.Б. и др. Ближайшие и отдаленные исходы переломов проксимального отдела бедра у лиц пожилого возраста и их медико-социальные последствия (по данным многоцентрового исследования). Остеопороз и остеопатии 2002;1:8-11.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ершова О.Б., Семенова О.В., Дегтярев А.А. Результаты проспективного изучения исходов переломов проксимального отдела бедра. Остеопороз и остеопатии 2000;1:9-10.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Лесняк О.М. Фармакоэкономика средств профилактики и лечения остеопороза. В кн.: Руководство по остеопорозу. М.: Бином. Лаборатория знаний, 2003;469-81&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Guidelines for clinical care. Osteoporosis: prevention and treatment. University of Michigan health system, 2010 Jul;15 p&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Papaioannou A., Morin S., Cheung A.M. et al. 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 2010;182:1864-73.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Остеопороз. Диагностика, профилактика и лечение. Клинические рекомендации. Под ред. О.М. Лесняк, Л.И. Беневоленской. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2010;272 с.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simonelli C., Chen Y., Morancey J. et al. Evaluation and management of osteoporosis following hospitalization for low-impact fracture. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18(1):17-22.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Schurink M., Hegeman J.H., Kreeftenberg H.G. et al. Follow-up for osteoporosis in older patients three years after a fracture. Netherlands J Med 2007;65(2):71-4.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Еstrand J., Thorngren K.-G. One fracture is enough- Experience with a prospective and consecutive osteoporosis screening program with 239 fracture patients. Acta Orthopaedica 2006;77(1):3-8.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Follin S.L., Black J.N., McDermott M.T. Lack of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in men and women after hip fracture. Pharmacotherapy 2003;23(2):190-8.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jennings L.A., Auerbach A.D., Maselli J. et al. Missed Opportunities for Osteoporosis Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Hip Fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58(4):650-7&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Premaor M.O., Pilbrow L., Tonkin C. et al. Low rates of treatment in postmenopausal women with a history of low trauma fractures: results of audit in a Fracture Liaison Service. Q J Med 2010;103:33-40.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Roerholt C., Eiken P., Abrahamsen B. Initiation of anti-osteoporotic therapy in patients with recent fractures: a nationwide analysis of prescription rates and persistence. Osteoporos Int 2009;20(2):299-307.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: WHO, 2003.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shu A.D.-H., Stedman M.R., Polinski J.M. et al. Adherence to Osteoporosis Medications After Patient and Physician Brief Education: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Manag Care 2009;15(7):417-24.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gregory P.C., Lam D., Howell P. Osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture: how rates vary by service. South Med J 2010;103(10):977-81. 19. Rabenda V., Vanoverloop J., Fabri V. et al. Low incidence of anti-osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(10):2142-8.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Еstrand J., Thorngren K.-G., Еkesson K. et al. 3-year follow-up of 215 fracture patients from a prospective and consecutive osteoporosis screening program - Fracture patients care. Acta Orthopaedica 2008;79(3):404-9.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kuo I., Ong C., Simmons L. et al. Successful direct intervention for osteoporosis in patients with minimal trauma fractures. Osteoporosis Int 2007;18(12):1633-9.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
