Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

STRUCTURAL PECULIARITIES OF PROXIMAL HIP BONE AS RISK FACTOR OF HIP FRACTURES IN IRKUTSK POPULATION

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2002-1210

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the several parameters of femoral neck geometry associated with hip fracture risk in Siberial population. Material anil methods. 51 patients (39 women and 12 men: aged 60-90 years) with hip fractures and 102 persons (78 women, 24 men) without fractures (control group). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry (DPX-IQ, Lunar, USA) in lumbar spine and in the hip (femoral neck, trochanter, Ward’s triangle) of the contralateral hip to the fracture. BMD was not significant in both groups. We measured hip axis length (the distance from greater trochanter to inner pelvic brim), the femoral neck axis length (the distance from the trochanter to ihe apex of the femoral head), neck width and the neck/shaft angle on the scan printout. Results. The hip axis length was longer in the women with the hip fractures (56,3±3,9 mm vs.53,7±3,7 mm, p<0,001), the femoral neck axis length (49,1 ±3,6 mm vs.46,3±3,l mm, p<0,001), mean femoral neck width (14,9±1,8 mm vs. 16,1±1,6 mm, p<0.01). The mean neck width was significantly greater in man with fractures cases that in controls (16,6±2,1 mm vs. I8,7±l,5 mm, p< 0,001). Neck shafl angle was not significant in both women and men with fractures and in controls. Conclusion. The hip axis length, the femoral neck axis length and the neck width in women and femoral neck width in men is significant independent predictors of hip fractures independently of BMD.

References

1. <div><p>Макаров М.А. Родионова С.С. Влияние структурных особенностей проксимального отдела бедренной кости на риск развития переломов шейки бедра при остеопорозе. Остеопороч и остеопатии, 2000, I, 32-34.</p><p>Михайлов Е.Е., Беневоленская Л.И.,Аникин С.Г. и соавт. Частота переломов проксимального отдела бедренной кости и дистального отдела предплечья среди городского населения России. Остеопороз и остеопатии, 1999, 3. 2-6.</p><p>Семенова О.В. Эпидемиологическая характеристика изменений бедренных костей при системном остеопорозе. Автореф. дисс. канд. мед. наук. 1999.</p><p>Beck T.J., RufTC.D., Mourlada F.A. el al. Dual-energy x-ray absorpliometry. derived structural geometry Гог stress fracture pre­diction in men U.S. Marine Corps recruits. J. Bone Miner. Res., 1996,11, 645-653.</p><p>Boonen S., Koutri R., Dequeker J. el al. Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and II osteoporosis: differences in hip length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis fractures. I Bone Miner. Res., 1995, 10, 12, 1908-1912.</p><p>Center J.R., Nguyen T.V., Pocock N.A. et al. Femoral axis length, height loss and risk of hip fracture in males and females. Osteoporosis Int., 1998,8,75-81.</p><p>Alonso C.G, Curiel M.D, Carranza F.H., et al. Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fraclure in men and wornen. Osteoporosis Int., 2000, 11, 714-720.</p><p>Duboeuf F., Hans S., Schott A.M el al. Different morfometric and densitometric parameters predict cervical and trochanteric hip fracture: the EPIDOS Study. J.Bone Miner. Res., 1997. 12, 18951902.</p><p>Faulkner K.G., Cummings S.R., Black D. et al. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J.Bone Miner. Res., 1993, 8, 1211-1217</p><p>Flicker L., Faulkner K.G., Hopper J.L. et al. Determinants of hip axis length in women aged 10-89 years: a cross-sectional DEXA study. Bone, 1996, 18,41-45.</p><p>Karlsson K.M., Sembo I., Obram K.J. et al. Femoral neek geometry and radiographic singns of osteoporosis as predictors of hip fracture. Bone, 1996, 18, 327-330.</p><p>Mikhail M B. Vaswani A.N., Aloia J.F. Racial differences in femoral dimensions and their relation to hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int. 1996, 6, 22-24.</p><p>O’Neill T.W., Grazio S., Spector T.D., Silman A.J. Geometric measurements of the proximal femur in UK women: secular increase between the late 1950s and early 1990s. Osteoporosis Int., 1996,6, 136-140.</p><p>Peacock М., Turner C.H., Manalunga A.K. et al. Better discrimination of fracture using bone density, geometry and architecture. Osteoporosis Int., 1995, 5,167-173.</p><p>Slemenda C.W., Turner C.H. Peacock M. et al. The genetics of proximal femur geometry, distribution of bone mass and bone mineral density. Osteoporosis Int., 1996, 6, 178-182.</p><p>Theobald T.M., Cauley J.A., Gluer C.C. et al. Black-white differences in hip geometry. Osteoporosis Int., 1998, 8, 61-67.</p><p>Yoshikawa Т.,Turner C.H., Peacock M. et al. Geometric structure of the femoral neck measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J.Bone Miner. Res., 1994, 9,1053-1064.</p></div><br />


Review

For citations:


Menshikova L.V., Khramtzova N.A. STRUCTURAL PECULIARITIES OF PROXIMAL HIP BONE AS RISK FACTOR OF HIP FRACTURES IN IRKUTSK POPULATION. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2002;40(3):17-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2002-1210

Views: 1163


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)