Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

COURSE OF UVEITIS IN PATIENTS WITH ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2016-1S-33-37

Abstract

Relapsing uveitis is a serious problem for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Tumor necrosis factor-α  inhibitors significantly reduce the frequency of uveitis attacks in AS patients, but they are not always available. In this connection, it is appropriate  to evaluate the effect of traditional  disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on the course of uveitis in AS.

Objective: to compare the frequency of uveitis attacks in AS during combined therapy using sulfasalazine (SULF)  and nonsteroidal  anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)  versus monotherapy with NSAIDs.

Subjects and methods. A total of 111 patients with significant AS who had at least one uveitis attack during the disease were examined. 49 subjects received combined therapy including SULF 2 grams daily and NSAIDs for at least 1 year. Six of the 49 patients were noted to have frequently relapsing uveitis (above 3 episodes yearly); 43 had no more than 3 ones per year. The remaining 62 patients took NSAIDs only throughout  the follow-up period. Nine of them had an average of 3 uveitis attacks per year; 53 had no more than 3 ones per year. Out of the 49 patients receiving combined therapy with NSAIDs and SULF,  23 took NSAIDs only at least 1 year before SULF use; 10 of them were observed to have frequent relapses in that period and 13 had three or fewer episodes.

Results and discussion. The entire group showed an average of 2.06±2.04 uveitis attacks per year during monotherapy with NSAIDs and 1.41±1.83 attacks yearly during combined therapy with NSAIDs and SULF (p = 0.08). Among the patients with less than 3 uveitis attacks per year, the mean number of episodes was significantly fewer during combined therapy than during NSAID monotherapy: 0.99±0.87 and 1.37±0.91,  respectively (p = 0.04). Among those with frequently relapsing uveitis (more than 3 attacks per year), the mean number of episodes yearly was not significantly different during NSAID monotherapy and combined therapy: 5.7±2.5 and 5.5±2.7,  respectively (p = 0.9). In a subgroup of patients receiving sequentially NSAID monotherapy and combined therapy with NSADs and SULF,  13 patients with three or fewer baseline attacks per year displayed a significant reduction  in the frequency of episodes from 1.92±0.96 to 0.4±0.44 (p = 0.00003). During combined therapy versus monotherapy, 10 patients with frequently relapsing uveitis (over 3 episodes yearly) exhibited an insignificant reduction  in the number of relapses from 5.9±3.02 to 5.33±1.1 (p = 0.6).

Conclusion. Combined therapy with SULF and NSAIDs does not substantially affect the frequency of uveitis episodes in AS patients with frequently relapsing uveitis (above 3 attacks per year), but significantly reduces the number of episodes among patients with its mild course (less than 3 attacks yearly).

About the Authors

A. A. Godzenko
Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow
Russian Federation

Godzenko Alla



A. G. Bochkova
Медицинский центр «Агат», Егорьевск
Russian Federation


O. A. Rumyantseva
Научно-исследовательский институт ревматологии имени В.А. Насоновой, Москва
Russian Federation


I. Yu. Razumova
Научно-исследовательский институт глазных болезней, Москва
Russian Federation


V. V. Badokin
Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow
Russian Federation


Sh. F. Erdes
Научно-исследовательский институт ревматологии имени В.А. Насоновой, Москва
Russian Federation


References

1. Годзенко АА, Бочкова АГ, Румянцева ОА и др. Течение и исходы увеита у больных анкилозирующим спондилитом. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2014;52(5):520-6 [Godzenko AA, Bochkova AG, Rumyantseva OA, et al. Progression and outcomes of uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2014;52(5):520-5 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2014-520-525

2. Rudwaleit M, Rodevand E, Holck P. Adalimumab effectively reduces the rate of anterior uveitis flares in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a prospective open-label study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(5):696-701. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.092585

3. Coates L, McGonagle D, Bennett A. Uveitis and tumour necrosis factor blockade in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:729-30. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.077370

4. Guignard S, Gossec L, Salliot C. Efficacy of tumour necrosis factor blockers in reducing uveitis flares in patients with spondylarthropathy: a retrospective study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1631-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.052092

5. Годзенко АА, Бочкова АГ, Румянцева ОА и др. Влияние терапии ингибиторами фактора некроза опухоли α на частоту обострений увеита у больных анкилозирующим спондилитом. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2014;52(1):27-30 [Godzenko AA, Bochkova AG, Rumyantseva OA, et al. Impact of the therapy with tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors on the frequency of uveitis exacerbations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2014;52(1):27-30 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2014-27-30

6. Насонов ЕЛ, редактор. Ревматология: Клинические рекомендации. 2-е изд. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2010. C. 271-89 [Nasonov EL, editor. Revmatologiya: Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. [Rheumatology: Clinical guidelines]. 2nd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2010. P. 271-89].

7. Braun J, van den Berg R, Baraliakos X, et al. 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):896-904. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.151027

8. Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Garcia-Sanchez J, Iradier T, Banares A. Sulfasalazine in the prevention of anterior uveitis associated with ankylosing spondylitis. Eye (Lond). 2000 Jun;14(Pt 3A):340-3. doi: 10.1038/eye.2000.84

9. Munoz-Fernandez S, Hidalgo V, Fernandez-Melon J. Sulfasalazine reduces the number of flares of acute anterior uveitis over a one-year period. J Rheumatol. 2003;(6):1277.

10. Van der Linden S, Valkenburg H, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal to modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27:361-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780270401

11. Clegg DO, Reda DJ, Abdellatif M. Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo for the treatment of axial and peripheral manifestations of the seronegative spondyloarthropathies: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:2325-9. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199911)42:11<2325::AIDANR10>3.0.CO;2-C

12. Chen J, Liu C. Sulfasalazine for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD004800.

13. Nissila M, Lehtinen K, Leirisalo-Repo M, et al. Sulfasalazine in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a twenty-six-week, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:1111-6. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310905

14. Schmidt WA, Wierth S, Milleck D, et al. Sulfasalazine in ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study and comparison with other controlled studies. Z Rheumatol. 2002;61(2):159-67. doi: 10.1007/s003930200024

15. Chen J, Liu C. Is sulfasalazine effective in ankylosing spondylitis?A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(4):722-31.

16. Braun J, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Huang F, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept versus sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, double-blind trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:1543-51. doi: 10.1002/art.30223

17. Ward MM, Kuzis S. Treatments used by patients with ankylosing spondylitis: comparison with the treatment preferences of rheumatologists. J Clin Rheumatol. 1999;(5):1-8. doi: 10.1097/00124743-199902000-00001

18. Ward MM. Sulfasalazine for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: Relic or niche medication? Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(6):1472-4. doi: 10.1002/art.30225

19. Van der Heijde D, Landewe R, van der Linden S. How should treatment effect on spinal radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis be measured? Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1979-85. doi: 10.1002/art.21133

20. Collantes E, Zarco1 P, Munoz E, et al. Disease pattern of spondyloarthropathies in Spain: description of the first national registry (REGISPONSER) – extended report. Rheumatology. 2007;46:1309-15. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem084

21. Эрдес ШФ, Волнухин ЕВ, Галушко ЕА и др. Лечение больных анкилозирующим спондилитом в реальной практике врача-ревматолога в России. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2013;51(1):15-20 [Erdes SF, Volnuhin EV, Galushko EA, et al. Treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in the real clinical practice of a rheumatologist in Russia. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2013;51(1):15-20. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2013-1195.


Review

For citations:


Godzenko A.A., Bochkova A.G., Rumyantseva O.A., Razumova I.Yu., Badokin V.V., Erdes Sh.F. COURSE OF UVEITIS IN PATIENTS WITH ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54(1S):33-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2016-1S-33-37

Views: 1123


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)