Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

THE RESULTS OF A PHASE III COMPARATIVE CLINICAL TRIAL OF RITUXIMAB (ACELLBIA® AND MABTHERA®) IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (THE BIORA STUDY)

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2016-510-519

Abstract

The article considers the results of an international multicenter randomized clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of the brand-name drug rituximab (MabThera), a monoclonal antibody against CD20 antigen of B cells, and its biosimi-lar drug (Acellbia®) (the BIORA study) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to therapy with tumor necrosis factor-а inhibitors.

Objective: to provide evidence for the therapeutic equivalence of Acellbia® and MabThera® and also to assess their interchangeability.

Subjects and methods. The trial enrolled adult patients with active seropositive RA, who were randomized into two groups (1:1): 1) the patients who received Acellbia® 1000 mg intravenously on days 1 and 15; 2) those who had MabThera® in a similar way. When RA activity persisted at 24 weeks, there was re-randomization (1:1) with a partial overlap: Group 1 patients were randomized into group AA (the drug of the second therapy cycle was Acellbia®) or Group AM (that was MabThera®), the similar methodology was followed in Group 2 (Groups MM and MA). Throughout the study, the patients received methotrexate at a stable dose of 7.5—25 mg/week and folic acid at a dose of 5 mg/week. The follow-up lasted 48 weeks.

Results and discussion. 24 weeks after treatment initiation, the ACR20 response was observed in 84.1% of the patients in the Acellbia® group (95% CI, 74.75—90.50) and in 87% in the MabThera® group (95% CI, 77.71—92.79%; p = 0.773), which suggests that the drugs are therapeutically equivalent. In the second phase of the study, the efficiency of therapy remained high; there were no differences in Groups AA/MM, AA/AM and MM/MA. In both phases, the safety profile of the drugs was comparable; the immunogenicity of treatment remained low. The findings suggest that the brand-name MabThera® and its biosimilar drug Acellbia® are equivalent. Switching from the biosimilar drug to the brand-name one and vice versa has no negative impact on treatment outcomes. 

About the Authors

E. L. Nasonov
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; Institute of Professional Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Evgeny Nasonov - Department of Rheumatology, Institute of Professional Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University.

78, Trubetskaya St., Build. 2, Moscow 119991; 134A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522



E. V. Zonova
City Clinical Polyclinic One
Russian Federation

42, Serebrennikovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630099



O. N. Ivanova
Voronezh Regional Clinical Hospital One
Russian Federation

151, Moskovsky Prospect, Voronezh 394066



L. A. Knyazeva
Kursk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

45-a, Sumskaya St., Kursk 305007



V. I. Mazurov
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation

41, Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015



R. R. Samigullina
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation

41, Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015



I. M. Marusenko
V.A. Baranov Republican Hospital
Russian Federation

3, Pirogov St., Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia 185019



O. B. Nesmeyanova
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

70, Vorovsky St., Chelyabinsk 454076



T. V. Plaksina
N.A. Semashko Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

190, Rodionov St., Nizhny Novgorod 603126



A. E. Sizikov
Research Institute of Fundamental and Clinical Immunology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

2/1, Zalessky St., Novosibirsk 630047



D. G. Krechikova
Sectional Hospital at the Smolensk Station, RZhD, OAO
Russian Federation

15, First Krasnoflotsky Lane, Smolensk 214025



N. A. Petrochenkova
Smolensk State Medical University
Russian Federation
28, Krupskaya St., Smolensk 214019


Yu. S. Shapovalova
Railway Clinical Hospital at the Chelyabinsk Station, RZhD, OAO
Russian Federation

41, Tsvilling St., Chelyabinsk 454000



N. S. Soroka
City Clinical Hospital Nine
Belarus

8, Semashko St., Minsk, Republic of Belarus 220045



S. I. Pimanov
Vitebsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Belarus

37, Soldiers-Internationalists St., Vitebsk, Republic of Belarus 210037



A. M. Pristrom
City Clinical Hospital One
Belarus

64, Nezavisimost Pr., Minsk, Republic of Belarus 220013



E. V. Kunder
City Clinical Hospital One
Belarus

64, Nezavisimost Pr., Minsk, Republic of Belarus 220013



E. V. Chernyaeva
BIOKAD, ZAO
Russian Federation
34A, Svyaz St., Strelnya, Saint Petersburg 198515


A. V. Eremeeva
BIOKAD, ZAO
Russian Federation
34A, Svyaz St., Strelnya, Saint Petersburg 198515


R. Ivanov
BIOKAD, ZAO
Russian Federation
34A, Svyaz St., Strelnya, Saint Petersburg 198515


References

1. Насонов ЕЛ, Каратеев ДЕ. Ревматоидный артрит. В кн.: Насонов ЕЛ, Насонова ВА, редакторы. Ревматология: Национальное руководство. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2008. С. 852 [Nasonov EL, Karateev DE. Rheumatoid arthritis. In: Nasonov EL, Nasonova VA, editors. Revmatologiya: Natsional’noe rukovodstvo [Rheumatology: National guidelines]. Moscow: GEOTAR Media; 2008. P. 852].

2. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016. doi: 10.1016/S)140-6736(16)30173-7

3. Насонов ЕЛ. Проблемы ревматоидного артрита в XXI столетии. Вестник РАН. 2015;85:744-54 [Nasonov EL. Problems of rheumatoid arthritis in the XXI century. Vestnik RAN. 2015;85:744-54 (In Russ.)].

4. Насонов ЕЛ, редактор. Генно-инженерные биологические препараты в лечении ревматоидного артрита. Москва: ИМАПРЕСС; 2013. 552 с. [Nasonov EL, editor. Genno-inzhenernye biologicheskie preparaty v lechenii revmatoidnogo artrita [Genetically engineered biological agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis]. Moscow: IMA-PRESS; 2013. 552 p.].

5. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijsma JWJ, et al. For the T2T Expert Committee. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:631-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.123919

6. Dorner T, Burmester GR. The role of B cells in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003;15:246-52. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200305000-00011

7. Marston B, Palanichamy A, Anolik JH. B cells in the pathpfenesis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2010;22:307-15. doi: 10.1097/BOR.9b013e3283369cb8

8. Насонов ЕЛ, редактор. Анти-В-клеточная терапия в ревматологии: фокус на ритуксимаб. Москва: ИМАПРЕСС; 2012. 344 с. [Nasonov EL, editor. Anti-B-kletochnaya terapiya v revmatologii: fokus na rituksimab [Anti-B-cell therapy in rheumatology: Focus on rituximab]. Moscow: IMA-PRESS; 2012. 344 p.].

9. World Health Organization, Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (2009) Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs). World Health Organization. Available from: http://www.who.int/biologicals/areas/biological_therapeutics/BIOTHERAPEUTICS_FOR_WEB_22APRIL 2010.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015.

10. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) (2014). Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. European Medicines Agency. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2015/01/WC500180219.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2015.

11. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2015) Guidance for industry: scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015.

12. Dorner T, Kay J. Biosimilars in rheumatology: current perspectives and lessons learnt. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11:713-24. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.110

13. FDA approves Inflectra, a biosimilar to Remicad. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm494227.htm. Accessed 6 April 2016.

14. Капланов КД, Зарицкий АЮ, Алексеев СМ и др. Начало эры применения биоаналогов моноклональных антител в онкологии: современные международные рекомендации и результаты исследования первого российского биоаналога ритуксимаба у больных В-клеточной неходжкинской лимфомой. Современная онкология. 2014;16:38-44 [Kaplanov CD, Zaritskii AYu, Alekseev SM, et al. Beginning of an era of application of biosimilars of monoclonal antibodies in oncology: Current international recommendations and findings of the first Russian biosimilars rituximab in patients with B-cell nonHodgkin's lymphoma. Sovremennaya Onkologiya. 2014;16:38-44 (In Russ.)].

15. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315-24. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310302

16. Fransen J, van Riel PL. The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR response criteria. Rheum Dis Clin North Amer. 2009;35:745-57, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.001

17. Paulus HE, Egger MJ, Ward JR, Williams HJ, and the Cooperative Systematic Studies Of Rheumatic Disease Group. Analysis of improvement in individual rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, based on the finding in patients treated with placebo. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:477-84. doi: 10.1002/art.1780330403

18. Edwards JC, Szczepanski L, Szechinski J, et al. Efficacy of B-celltargeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2572-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032534

19. Emery P, Fleischmann R, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, et al. The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1390-400. doi: 10.1002/art.21778

20. Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, et al. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2793-806. doi: 10.1002/art.22025

21. Rubbert-Roth A, Tak PP, Zerbini C, et al; MIRROR Trial Investigators. Efficacy and safety of various repeat treatment dosing regimens of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a Phase III randomized study (MIRROR). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49:1683-93. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq116

22. Denoel A, Dieude P, Chollet-Martin S, Grootenboer-Mignot S. Immunogenicity of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A kinetic analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:720. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.4232

23. Joly MS, Martin RP, Mitra-Kaushik S, et al. Transient low-dose methotrexate generates B regulatory cells that mediate antigen-specific tolerance to alglucosidase alfa. J Immunol. 2014;193:3947-58. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303326. Epub 2014 Sep 10.


Review

For citations:


Nasonov E.L., Zonova E.V., Ivanova O.N., Knyazeva L.A., Mazurov V.I., Samigullina R.R., Marusenko I.M., Nesmeyanova O.B., Plaksina T.V., Sizikov A.E., Krechikova D.G., Petrochenkova N.A., Shapovalova Yu.S., Soroka N.S., Pimanov S.I., Pristrom A.M., Kunder E.V., Chernyaeva E.V., Eremeeva A.V., Ivanov R. THE RESULTS OF A PHASE III COMPARATIVE CLINICAL TRIAL OF RITUXIMAB (ACELLBIA® AND MABTHERA®) IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (THE BIORA STUDY). Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54(5):510-519. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2016-510-519

Views: 6900


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)