ULTRASONOGRAPHIC CHANGES IN THE HYALINE CARTILAGE: EVALUATION OF SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY IN EARLY GOUTY ARTHRITIS
https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2017-237-240
Abstract
A sonographic sign, such as linear hyperechoic inclusions or uric acid deposits in the hyaline cartilage, has been recently introduced into the system of gout classification criteria. At the same time, the differential diagnostic value of this sign in early gouty arthritis (GA) has not been adequately explored.
Objective: to evaluate specificity and sensitivity for detecting linear hyperechoic inclusions in the differential diagnosis of early GA in comparison with the increased level of uric acid, the presence of subcutaneous tophi, and the identification of intraosseous cysts at radiography.
Subjects and methods. The investigators analyzed the data of examining 119 patients with arthritis with its symptom duration within 6 months at the stage of differential diagnosis. The following diagnoses were further established: GA in 32 patients, osteoarthritis (OA) in 28, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 28, and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 16. Along with clinical, laboratory, and radiological examinations, all the patients underwent ultrasonography (USG) of inflamed joints with an 18-MHz linear transducer to identify linear hyperechoic inclusions (urate deposits) in the hyaline cartilage.
Results and discussion. Joint USG revealed urate deposits in 28 (87.5%) patients with GA, in 3 (10.7%) with OA, and in 1 (6.3%) with PsA. The sensitivity of the other signs of gout in early GA was 21.7% for intraosseous cysts, 25.0% for subcutaneous tophi, and 81.3% for hyperuricemia. The specificity of USG for urate deposits in GA was 94.4% and was comparable with that for the other signs of gout (86.1–98.6%). Conclusion. USG detection of urate deposits in patients with gout is characterized by high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing GA within the first 6 months after the initial symptoms appear.
About the Authors
A. V. PetrovRussian Federation
5/7, Lenin Boulevard, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea 295006
O. P. Prokopenko
Russian Federation
5/7, Lenin Boulevard, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea 295006
A. A. Petrov
Russian Federation
5/7, Lenin Boulevard, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea 295006
N. V. Matveeva
Russian Federation
5/7, Lenin Boulevard, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea 295006
References
1. Елисеев МС. Динамика клинических проявлений подагры у мужчин (данные 7-летнего ретроспективного наблюдения). Терапевтический архив. 2015;87(5):10-5 [Eliseev MS. Dynamics of clinical manifestations of gout in men (data from a 7-year retrospective observation). Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. 2015;87(5):10-5 (In Russ.)].
2. Елисеев МС. Алгоритм диагностики и лечения подагры. Рус- ский медицинский журнал. 2015;(7):410-4 [Eliseev MS. Algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of gout. Russkii Meditsinskii Zhurnal. 2015;(7):410-4 (In Russ.)].
3. Filippucci E, Di Geso L, Grassi W. Tips and tricks to recognize microcrystalline arthritis. Rheumatology. 2012;51(7):18-21. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes332
4. Naredo E, Uson J, Jimenez-Palor M, et al. Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout? Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(10):1522-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203487
5. Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N, et al. Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(10):1789-98. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208237
6. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29:1039-49. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816
7. Altman R, Alarcon D, Appelrouth D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:1601-9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780331101
8. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman A, et al. Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria. An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2569-81. doi: 10.1002/art.27584
9. Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis; development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2665-73. doi: 10.1002/art.21972
10. Thiele RG, Schlesinger N. Diagnosis of gout by ultrasound. Rheumatology. 2007;46:1116-21. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem058
11. Filippucci E, Riveros MG, Georgescu D, et al. Hyaline cartilage involvement in patients with gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease: An ultrasound study. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2009;17:178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.06.003
12. Wright SA, Filippucci E, McVeigh C, et al. High resolution ultrasonography of the 1st metatarsal phalangeal join in gout: a controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:859-64. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.062802
13. Ottaviani S, Richette P, Allard A, et al. Ultrasonography in gout: a case-control study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30:499-504.
14. De Miguel E, Puig JG, Castillo C, et al. Diagnosis of gout in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a pilot ultrasound study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:157-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.154997
Review
For citations:
Petrov A.V., Prokopenko O.P., Petrov A.A., Matveeva N.V. ULTRASONOGRAPHIC CHANGES IN THE HYALINE CARTILAGE: EVALUATION OF SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY IN EARLY GOUTY ARTHRITIS. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(3):237-240. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2017-237-240