Efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with methotrexate in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis: Results of phase II AURORA study

Levilimab (LVL) is a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor (IL6R). The article presents data obtained during 56 weeks of the AURORA phase II study.
Objective: to evaluate the efficacy safety and immunogenicity of LVL in methotrexate (MTX) resistant patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Materials and methods. 105 patients with active RA were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into two LVL or placebo groups. LVL was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 162 mg every week (QW) or every other week (Q2W). All patients received MTX. After evaluating the primary endpoint of 20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20) at week 12, patients in the placebo group were switched to LVL Q2W. The study duration was 56 weeks. The frequency, profile, degree and severity of adverse events were determined in each group for safety assessment. The immunogenicity of LVL was determined by the proportion of patients with identified binding and neutralizing antidrug antibodies.
Results. LVL in both regimens was superior to placebo. At week 12, the incidence of ACR20 achievement was 77.1% (LVL QW), 57.1% (LVL Q2W), and 17.1% (placebo) with 95% confidence intervals [37.53; 82.54] (p<0.0001) and [19.08; 68.42] (p=0.003) for the effect difference between LVL and placebo groups. The clinical response, more pronounced in the LVL QW group, persisted until week 52 with an increase in the proportion of patients with ACR50/70, low activity and RA remission. The most common treatment-related adverse events were laboratory abnormalities (predominantly grade 1–2) such as neutropenia, elevated alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase levels, hypercholesterolemia, and elevated triglyceride levels. Antidrug antibodies were not identified.
Conclusion. In MTX-resistant patients with active RA, the efficacy of both LVL regimens at a dose of 162 mg in combination with MTX was significantly superior to MT monotherapy. LVL QW lead to highest treatment response. LVL has been shown to be well tolerated and low immunogenicity. LVL safety profile is similar to IL6R inhibitors.

1. Насонов ЕЛ (ред.). Российские клинические рекомендации. Ревматология. М.;2016:17-57. [Nasonov EL (ed.). Rheumatology: Russian clinical guidelines. Moscow;2019:17-57 (In Russ.)].

2. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Barton A, Burmester GR, Emery P, Firestein GS, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18001. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.1

3. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2

4. Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):685-699. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655

5. Listing J, Strangfeld A, Rau R, Kekow J, Gromnica-Ihle E, Klopsch T, et al. Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(3):R66. doi: 10.1186/ar1933

6. Paulshus Sundlisaeter N, Olsen IC, Aga AB, Hammer HB, Uhlig T, van der Heijde D, et al. Predictors of sustained remission in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated according to an aggressive treat-to-target protocol. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(11):2022-2031. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key202

7. Khlyabova P, Eremeeva A, Lutckii A, Dokukina E, Chernyaeva E, Ivanov R. SAT0040: Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bcd-089, novel monoclonal anti-IL6 receptor antibody: results from the first-in-human single dose escalation study in healthy volunteers. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl 2):884-885. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.2410

8. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569-2581. doi: 10.1002/art.27584

9. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, et al. American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(6):727-735. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380602

10. Heegaard C, Dreyer L, Egsmose C, Madsen OR. Test-retest reliability of the disease activity score 28 CRP (DAS28-CRP), the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) in rheumatoid arthritis when based on patient self-assessment of tender and swollen joints. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32(10):1493-1500. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2300-9

11. Bykerk VP, Massarotti EM. The new ACR/EULAR remission criteria: rationale for developing new criteria for remission. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(Suppl 6):vi16-vi20. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes281

12. van der Heijde D. How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(1):261-263.

13. Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Kivitz AJ, Rell-Bakalarska M, Martincova R, Fiore S, et al. Sarilumab plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: Results of a phase III study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(6):1424-1437. doi: 10.1002/art.39093

14. Kivitz A, Olech E, Borofsky M, Zazueta BM, Navarro-Sarabia F, Radominski SC, et al. Subcutaneous tocilizumab versus placebo in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(11):1653-1661. doi: 10.1002/acr.22384

15. 15. Mazurov V, Zotkin E, Ilivanova E, Kropotina T, Plaksina T, Nesmeyanova O, et al. FRI0108 Shot-term efficacy of BCD-089, novel monoclonal anti-IL6 receptor antibody, in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 12-week results of phase 2 AURORA Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(Suppl 2):721.

16. Fleischmann R, van Adelsberg J, Lin Y, Castelar-Pinheiro GD, Brzezicki J, Hrycaj P, et al. Sarilumab and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(2):277-290. doi: 10.1002/art.39944

17. Huizinga TW, Fleischmann RM, Jasson M, Radin AR, van Adelsberg J, Fiore S, et al. Sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL6R alpha in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: efficacy and safety results from the randomised SARIL-RA-MOBILITY Part A trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(9):1626-1634. doi: 10.1136/ann-rheumdis-2013-204405

18. Maini RN, Taylor PC, Szechinski J, Pavelka K, Broll J, Balint G, et al. Double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial of the interleukin 6 receptor antagonist, tocilizumab, in European patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an incomplete response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(9):2817-2829. doi: 10.1002/art.22033

19. Castagne B, Viprey M, Martin J, Schott AM, Cucherat M, Soubrier M. Cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220178

20. Giles JT, Sattar N, Gabriel S, Ridker PM, Gay S, Warne C, et al. Cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab versus etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(1):31-40. doi: 10.1002/art.41095