Real-world retention rate, effectiveness, and safety of netakimab in the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Two-year results of the real word evidence LIBRA study
https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2025-253-261
Abstract
Under real-world clinical practice together with indices for assessing disease activity and the effectiveness of therapy, drug retention provides critical information on efficacy, safety, compliance and convenience of use.
The aim – to obtain data on the safety of netakimab (NTK) in a population of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), including various somatic diseases, as well as to assess retention on therapy during 2 years of observation in real word clinical practice.
Materials and methods. Patients were recruited for the study from August 2020 to December 2021 at 23 centers in the Russian Federation. The study included 137 patients who were prescribed netakimab therapy before enrollment. Clinical and medical history data for the first visit were entered retrospectively, and following visits at 12, 24, 52, 76, 104 weeks of therapy were collected within the study. The average age of the patients 42,3 y. O., 34.3% of them with previous biologics therapy.
Results. Median observation period was 104 weeks (range 1–137 weeks). At the end of the analyzed period (104 weeks of therapy), 85,5% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 79.7–91.8] of patients continued treatment with Netakimab. Retention on NTK therapy was slightly better in “bio-naïve” vs patients who received biologics earlier: 88.7% (95% CI: 82.3–95.5) and 78.9% (95% CI: 67.5–92.2), respectively, without significant differences between groups (p=0.16). 21 (15.3%) patients withdrew from study before visit 6. The main end of study reasons was lost to follow-up – 7 (5.1%) patients, and treatment inefficacy – 6 (4.4%) patients. The BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index) and ASDAS-CRP (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein) showed statistically significant decreases from baseline: by three times during the first 3 months of therapy and two times decrease during the first year of treatment. This trend continued in the second year of treatment, although with a lower rate of reduction. By week 104 of therapy, 52.9% (95% CI: 47.3–58.4) reached low disease activity (1.3≤ASDAS<2.1), 21.3% (95% CI: 12.8–29.8) had inactive disease (ASDAS<1.3). Netakimab was well tolerated by patients: AEs, related to therapy according to the investigator’s opinion, were reported in 8 (6.0%) patients.
Conclusions. In real-world clinical practice, 85.5% of patients continued treatment with Netakimab at the end of 104 weeks. By 104 weeks 74% patients had low disease activity or inactive disease. Netakimab was well tolerated by most of patients.
About the Authors
Sh. F. ErdesRussian Federation
Shandor F. Erdes.
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
Competing Interests:
None
V. I. Mazurov
Russian Federation
Vadim I. Mazurov.
191015, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41; 190068, Saint Petersburg, Bolshaya Podyacheskaya str., 30
Competing Interests:
None
I. Z. Gaydukova
Russian Federation
Inna Z. Gaydukova.
191015, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41; 190068, Saint Petersburg, Bolshaya Podyacheskaya str., 30
Competing Interests:
None
O. N. Anoshenkova
Russian Federation
Olga N. Anoshenkova.
634021, Tomsk, Frunze Avenue, 172/3
Competing Interests:
None
I. B. Vinogradova
Russian Federation
Irina B. Vinogradova.
432063, Ulyanovsk, III Internatsionala str., 7
Competing Interests:
None
Yu. Yu. Grabovetskaya
Russian Federation
Yulia Yu. Grabovetskaya.
236000, Kaliningrad, Klinicheskaya str., 74
Competing Interests:
None
S. Yu. Davidian
Russian Federation
Satenik Yu. Davidian.
105203, Moscow, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya str., 70
Competing Interests:
None
O. E. Epifanova
Russian Federation
Olga E. Epifanova.
167031, Syktyvkar, Klary Zetkin str., 50
Competing Interests:
None
N. A. Kiryukhina
Russian Federation
Nataliya A. Kiryukhina.
105203, Moscow, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya str., 70
Competing Interests:
None
L. V. Masneva
Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Masneva.
308007, Belgorod, Nekrasova str., 8/9
Competing Interests:
None
I. V. Menshikova
Russian Federation
Irina V. Menshikova.
119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8, building 2
Competing Interests:
None
O. N. Mironenko
Russian Federation
Olga N. Mironenko.
198515, Saint Petersburg, Strelna, 12, Svyazi str., 38, building 1
Competing Interests:
None
N. E. Nikulenkova
Russian Federation
Natalya E. Nikulenkova.
600023, Vladimir, Sudogorskoye Highway, 41
Competing Interests:
None
T. V. Povarova
Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Povarova.
410004, Saratov, 1-y Stantsionny road, 7A, building 2
Competing Interests:
None
A. N. Polyatika
Russian Federation
Anna N. Polyatika.
690042, Vladivostok, Basargina str., 42V
Competing Interests:
None
R. R. Samigullina
Russian Federation
Ruzana R. Samigullina.
191015, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41
Competing Interests:
None
A. E. Sizikov
Russian Federation
Alexey E. Sizikov.
630099, Novosibirsk, Yadrintsevskaya str., 14
Competing Interests:
None
I. N. Totrov
Russian Federation
Igor N. Totrov.
362019, Vladikavkaz, Pushkinskaya str., 40
Competing Interests:
None
I. F. Umnova
Russian Federation
Irina F. Umnova.
644012, Omsk, Berezovaya str., 3
Competing Interests:
None
A. L. Chudinov
Russian Federation
Anton L. Chudinov.
191015, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41; 190068, Saint Petersburg, Bolshaya Podyacheskaya str., 30
Competing Interests:
None
References
1. Gaidukova IZ, Rebrov AP, Lapshina SA, Otteva EN, Dubinina TV, Badokin VV, et al. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and biological agents for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritides. recommendations of the Spondyloarthritis Study Group of Experts, All-Russian Public Organization «The Association of Rheumatology of Russia». Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologia = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(5):474-484 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-474-484
2. Ramiro S, Nikiphorou E, Sepriano A, Ortolan A, Webers C, Baraliakos X, et al. ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):19-34. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223296
3. Erdes SF. Recent advances and prospects of axial spondyloarthritis/ankylosing spondylitis treatment. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2021;15(2):94-105 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2021-2-94-105
4. Griffiths H, Smith T, Mack C, Leadbetter J, Butcher B, Acar M, et al. Persistence to biologic therapy among patients with ankylosing spondylitis: An observational study using the OPAL dataset. J Rheumatol. 2022;49(2):150-156. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.201551
5. Carretero G, Puig L, Carrascosa JM, Ferrándiz L, Ruiz-Villaverde R, de la Cueva P, et al.; from the Spanish Group of Psoriasis. Redefining the therapeutic objective in psoriatic patients candidates for biological therapy. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018;29(4):334-346. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1395794
6. Acar M, Juneja P, Handel M. Treatment persistence of subcutaneous TNF inhibitors among Australian patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD). Open Access Rheumatol Res Rev. 2018;10:151-160.
7. Lindström U, Olofsson T, Wedrén S, Qirjazo I, Askling J. Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: A nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1908-9
8. Flouri ID, Markatseli TE, Boki KA, Papadopoulos I, Skopouli FN, Voulgari PV, et al. Comparative analysis and predictors of 10-year tumor necrosis factor inhibitors drug survival in patients with spondyloarthritis: First-year response predicts longterm drug persistence. J Rheumatol. 2018;45(6):785-794. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170477
9. Machado MA, Moura CS, Ferré F, Bernatsky S, Rahme E, Acurcio Fde A. Treatment persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Rev Saude Publica. 2016;50:50. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006265
10. Weinstein CLJ, Meehan AG, Lin J, Briscoe SD, Govoni M. Long-term golimumab persistence: Five-year treatment retention data pooled from pivotal phase III clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2023;42(12):3397-3405. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06760-z
11. Mazurov VI, Erdes ShF, Gaydukova IZ, Dubinina TV, Pristrom AM, Kunder EV, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of netakimab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: Results of three years of use in the international multicentre, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial BCD-085-5/ ASTERA. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2024;18(1):35-46 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2024-1-35-46
12. Erdes Sh, Mazurov VI, Gaydukova IZ, Anoshenkova ON, Vinogradova IB, Grabovetskaya YuYu, et al. Real-world retention rate, effectiveness, and safety of netakimab in the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: First year results of the LIBRA post-registration safety study. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologia = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2023;61(6):700-710 (In Russ.). doi: 10.47360/1995-4484-2023-700-710
13. Efleira, Drug №=(005293)-(РГ-RU). 2024 (In Russ.). URL: https://grls. rosminzdrav.ru/InstrImg/2024/09/30/1509140/29e54a2a-45f6-4a55-b39c-480d32901f41.pdf (Accessed: 12th January, 2025).
14. Pons M, Georgiadis S, Østergaard M, Ahmadzay ZF, Glintborg B, Heberg J, et al. Four-year secukinumab treatment outcomes in European real-world patients with axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2025;92(3):105824. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105824
15. Mazurov VI, Gaydukova IZ, Erdes Sh, Dubinina TV, Pristrom AM, Kunder EV, et al. Efficacy and safety of netakimab, anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Results of phase III international, multicenter, randomized double-blind clinical trial BCD-085-5/ASTERA. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologia = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020;58(4):376-386 (In Russ). doi: 10.47360/1995-4484-2020-376-386
16. Mazurov VI, Dubinina TV, Erdes S, Lapshina SA, Soroka NF, Kunder EV, et al. Response to netakimab in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients with different baseline C-reactive protein, sacroiliitis evaluated by MRI and peripheral joint involvement status: A post-hoc analysis of the ASTERA study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2023;41(3):718-726. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/ljpqqe
Review
For citations:
Erdes Sh.F., Mazurov V.I., Gaydukova I.Z., Anoshenkova O.N., Vinogradova I.B., Grabovetskaya Yu.Yu., Davidian S.Yu., Epifanova O.E., Kiryukhina N.A., Masneva L.V., Menshikova I.V., Mironenko O.N., Nikulenkova N.E., Povarova T.V., Polyatika A.N., Samigullina R.R., Sizikov A.E., Totrov I.N., Umnova I.F., Chudinov A.L. Real-world retention rate, effectiveness, and safety of netakimab in the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Two-year results of the real word evidence LIBRA study. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2025;63(3):253-261. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2025-253-261