Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

Comparison of diclofenac-emulgel local application with oral ibuprofen administration for the treatment of active interphalangeal hand joints osteoarthritis (Heberden and/or Bushar nodules)

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2007-836

Abstract

Objective. To assess efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac-emulgel local application in comparison with oral ibuprofen administration for the treatment of active interphalangeal hand joints osteoarthritis (Heberden and/or Bushar nodules). Material and methods. 321 pts were randomized into two groups. Diclofenac-emulgel (active drug) and placebo ibuprofen tablets were administered in one of them, placebo diclofenac-emulgel and ibuprofen tablets (active drug) — in the other. Diclofenac was administered as 10 cm strip locally 4 times a day and 400 mg of ibuprofen were given 3 times a day. Frequency of improvement was used as the main outcome measure. Improvement was registered if pain on 100 mm visual analog scale decreased at least by 40%. Disease activity, pain at rest, pain at movement, morning stiffness, grip strength and quality of life were used as additional outcome measures. Results. To the end of treatment according to 5% lower equivalency limit local therapy was at least as effective as oral administration of ibuprofen (p=0,007). Administration of both treatment methods provided also comparable improvement of all additional outcome measures. Both treatment methods showed good tolerability but more pts with receiving ibuprofen experienced serious adverse events than those using diclofenac (9 and 4 pts respectively). There was also similar proportion of pts prematurely withdrawn due to side effects (n=21): 5 (3%) from them received diclofenac and 16 (10%) - ibuprofen. Similar ratio of adverse events attributed to study treatment was revealed. Such events were present in 2 pts using diclofenac and in 13 (8,3%) receiving ibuprofen. Most of these events applied to gastrointestinal tract (in 1 pt using diclofenac and in 8 pts receiving ibuprofen). Conclusion. Local treatment of active interphalangeal hand joints osteoarthritis (Heberden and/or Bushar nodules) with diclofenac is at least as effective as systemic administration of ibuprofen. Tolerability of local therapy with diclofenac probably exceeds tolerability of systemic treatment with ibuprofen. This applies to gastrointestinal safety and frequency of adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal.

References

1. <div><p>Bertsch K., Abberger H. Topical NSAIDPreparations: Systemically or non-systemically available drugs? Symposium on Quality and Interchangeability of Topical Products for Local Action, (1995) 2nd EUFEPS Nuremberg Conference (Abstracts)</p><p>Dickson D.J. A double-blind evaluation of topical piroxicam gel with oral ibuprofen in osteoarthritis of the knee. Curr. Ther. Res., 1991, 49,199-207</p><p>Eccles М., Freemantle N., Mason J. North of England evidence based guideline development project: summary guideline for non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs versus basic analgesia in treating the pain of degenerative arthritis. BMJ, 1998; 317, 526-530</p><p>Evans J.M.M., McMahon A.D., McGilchrist M.M. et al. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and admission to hospital for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation:a record linkage casecontrol study. BMJ, 1995, 311, 22—26</p><p>Fries J.E. The hierarchy of quality-of-life assessment, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and issues mandating development ofa toxicity index. Control. Clin. Trials, 1991, 12, 106S-117S</p><p>Gebhardt М., Wollina U. Kutane Nebenwirkungen nichtsteroidaler Antiphlogistika (NSAID). Z. Rheumatol., 1995, 54, 405-412</p><p>Gondolph-Zink B., Gronwald U. Wirkstofflconzentrationen in artikularen und periartikularen Geweben des Kniegelenkes nach kutaner Anwendung von Diclofenac-Diethylammonium Emulgel. Akt. Rheumatol., 1996, 21, 298-304</p><p>Getzsche PC. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. BMJ, 2000, 320, 1058-1061</p><p>Grace D., Rogers J., Skeith K., Anderson K. Topical diclofenac versus placebo:a double-blind, randomized clinical trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J.Rheumatol., 1999, 26, 2659-2663</p><p>Grahame R, Transdermal non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents. BJCP, 1995. 49, 33-35</p><p>Hellenbrecht D. Nutzen und Risiken von nichtsteroEisenkolb (Munster), Fuhrmann (Nuremberg), Gloeser (Ostfildem-Nellingen), Grobecker (Regensburg), Grilndler (Lahnau), Harder (Dortmund), Haselhoff (Dortmund), Heese (Augsburg), Hilsmann (Dortmund), Holst (Hamburg), Jochum (Hamburg), Karl (Berlin), Kleine-Doepke (Dortmund), Nitsch (Augsburg), Reier (Bochum), Rosenkranz (GieBen), RoBler (Nuremberg), Riihlmann (Kassel). Schell (Ndmberg), Schmidt (Ransbach-Baumbach), Schnittert (Recklinghausen), Schramm (Munich), Senftleber (MeBkirch), Stachel (Mainz), Steeb (Stuttgart), Steinweg und Moritz (Unna), Talke (Berlin), Thabe (Bad Kreuznach), Zacher (Berlin), Zimmermann und Pustelnik (Berlin) idalen Antiphlogistika (NSA) bei systemischer und lokaler Anwendung. Med. Klin., 1993. 88, 532-539</p><p>Henry D., Lim LL., Garcia Rodriguez L.A. et al. Variability in risk or gastrointestinal complications with individual non-steroidal and-inflammatory drugs: results ofa collaborative meta-analysis. BMJ, 1996, 312, 1563-1566</p><p>Hemandez-Dias S., Rodriguez L.A. Association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding/perforation: an overview of epidemiologic studies published in the 1990s. Arch. Intern. Med., 2000. 160, 2093-2099</p><p>Hosie G. The topical NSAID, felbinac, versus oral ibuprofen:a comparison of efficacy in the treatment of acute lower back injury. Br. J. Clin. Res., 1993.4, 5-17</p><p>Patrignani P., Panara M.R., Sciulli M.G. et al. Differential inhibition of human prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-1 and -2 by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J.Physiol. Pharmacol., 1997, 48,623-631</p><p>Radermacher J., Jentsch D., Schall M.A. et al. Diclofenac concentrations in synovial fluid and plasma after cutaneous application in inflammatory and. degenerative joint disease. Br. Clin. Pharmac., 1991,31,537-541</p><p>Riess W., Schmid K., Botta L. et al. Die perkutane Resorption von Diclofenac. Arzneim. Forsch. Drug. Res., 1986, 36, 1092-1096</p><p>Schunack W. Gastrointestinale Nebenwirkungen nichtsteroidaler Antirheumatika, Z. Allg, Med., 1988, 64, 146-150</p><p>Talke M. Therapie von Heberdenund BouchardArthrosen Ergebnisse einer Doppelblindstudie mit dem Lokaltherapeutikum Etofenamat im Vergleich zu einem oralen Indometacingabe. Therapiewoche, 1985, 35, 3948-3954</p><p>Vanderstraeten C., Schuermans P. Study on the effect of etofenamate 10% cream in comparison with an oral NSAID in strains and sprains due to sports injuries. Medica Physica, 1990, 13, 139-141</p></div><br />


Review

For citations:


Zacher J., Burger K.J., Farber L., Grave M., Abberger H., Bertsch K. Comparison of diclofenac-emulgel local application with oral ibuprofen administration for the treatment of active interphalangeal hand joints osteoarthritis (Heberden and/or Bushar nodules). Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2007;45(2):36-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2007-836

Views: 899


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)