Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

NEW CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA FOR SCLERODERMA SYSTEMATICA (a lecture)

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2013-1546

Abstract

In 1980, the American College of Rheumatology proposed the first criteria as tentative for the diagnosis of scleroderma systematica (SDS). These criteria were aimed at revealing the comprehensive picture of mainly the diffuse form of the disease. They could not timely make a diagnosis in the low manifestive forms of the disease or virtually reveal its early stages that were most therapeutically promising. The review traces the evolution of approaches to diagnosing SDS and considers the novel classification criteria elaborated to select patients for epidemiological surveys and clinical trials. They include 8 parameters, each having scores. Skin thickening on both hands above the metacarpophalangeal articulations was highest (9 scores). The clinical variants of skin thickening on the fingers as its swelling (2 scores) or sclerodactyly (4 scores) are estimated from the maximum scores, as digital ischemia (sores, 2 scores; cicatricles, 3 scores). Teleangiectasias and characteristic capillaroscopic changes, as well as leading lung injury (pulmonary hypertension and/or interstitial lung disease) are rated as 2 scores each. Three scores are added to the total amount when Raynaud's syndrome is present and SDS-specific (anti-Scl-70, anti-centromere, and anti- RNA polymerase III) autoantibodies are detected. The patients gaining a total of 9 scores or more are classified as having definite SDS. Testing the novel criteria on a validation sample of 405 people showed that their sensitivity and specificity were 91 and 92%, respectively.

About the Author

Lidia Petrovna Ananyeva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. <div><p>Varga J, Abraham D. Systemic sclerosis: a prototypic multisistem fibrotic disorder.</p><p>J Clin Invest. 2007;117(3): 557–67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1172%2FJCI31139.</p><p>Гусева НГ. Системная склеродермия: ранняя диагностика и прогноз. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2007;1:39–45. [Guseva NG. Systemic sclerosis:.early diagnosis and prognosis. Sistemnaya sklerodermiya: rannyaya diagnostika i prognoz. Nauchno- prakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2007;1:39–45.]</p><p>Al-Dhaher FF, Pope JE, Quimet JM Determinants and mortality of systemic sclerosis in Canada. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010;39 (4):269–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Aug 15.</p><p>Steen VD, Medsger TA Severe organ involvement in systemic sclerosis with diffuse scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(11):2437–44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2F1529-0131%28200011%2943%3A11%3C2437%3A%3AAID-ANR10%3E3.0.CO%3B2-U.</p><p>Launay D, Sitbon O, Hachulla E et al. Survival in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012; Dec 7. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fannrheumdis-2012-202489.</p><p>Hudson M, Thombs B, Baron M. Time to diagnosis in systemic sclerosis: is gender a factor? Arthritis Rheum . 2007;56 (suppl):487.</p><p>Humbert M, Gerry Coghlan J, Khanna D. Early detection and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir Rev. 2012;21(126):306–12. DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00005112.</p><p>Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23(5):581–90.</p><p>Maricq HR, Gordon, Le Roy EC. Studies in patients with connective tissue disorders. Bibl Anat. 1977;(16 Pt 2):135–41.</p><p>Maricq HR. Widefield capillary microscopy: Technique and rating scale for abnormalities seen in scleroderma and related disorders. Arthritis Rheuum. 1981;24:1159–65.</p><p>Maricq HR, Harper FE, Khan MM et al. Microvascular abnormalities as possible predictors of disease subsets in Raynaud phenomenon and early connective tissue disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1983;1(3):195–205.</p><p>Cepeda EJ, Reveille JD. Antibodies in systemic sclerosis and fibrosing syndromes: clinical indications and relevance. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004;16(6):723–32.</p><p>Hu PQ, Fertig N, Medsger TA Jr, Wright TM. Correlation of serum anti-DNA topoisomerase I antibody levels with disease severity and activity in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(5):1363–73.</p><p>Steen VD. Autoantibodies in Systemic sclerosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005;35(1):35–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.semarthrit.2005.03.005.</p><p>Le Roy EC, Medsger TA Jr. Criteria for classification of early systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:1573–6.</p><p>Koenig M, Joyal F, Fritzler MJ et al. Autoantibodies and microvascular damage are independent predictive factors for the progression of Raynaud’s phenomenon to systemic sclerosis: a twenty year prospective study of 586 patients, with validation of proposed criteria for early systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(12):3902–12. DOI: 10.1002/art.24038.</p><p>Matucci-Cerinic M, Allanore Y, Czirjak L et al. The challenge of early systemic sclerosis for the EULAR Scleroderma Trail and Research group (EUSTAR) community. It is time to cut the Gordian knot and develop a prevention or rescue strategy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(9):1377–80. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.106302.</p><p>Avouac J, Fransen J, Walker UA et al. Preliminary criteria for the very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis: results of Delphi Consensus Study from EULAR Scleroderma Trails and Research Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(3):476–81. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2010.136929. Epub 2010 Nov 15.</p><p>Luggen M, Belhom L, Evans T et al. The evolution of Raynaud`s phenomen: a lingterm prospective study. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:226–32.</p><p>Valentini G, Cuomo G, Abignano G et al. Early systemic sclerosis: assesment of clinical and preclinical organ involvement in patients with different disease features. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(2):317–23. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq176. Epub 2010 Jun 18.</p><p>Valentini G,Vettononi S, Cuomo G et al. Early systemic sclerosis: short-term disease evolution and factors predicting the development of new manifestations of organ involvement. Arthriris Res Ther. 2012;14(4):R188. [Epub ahead of print]. DPO: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Far4019.</p><p>Van Der Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J et al. Classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: preliminary results. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72 (Suppl 3):59.</p><p>Jordan S, Maurer B, Michel B, Distler O. Performance of the new EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72 (Suppl 3):60.</p><p>Nihtyanova SI, Tang EC, Coghlan JG et al. Improved survival in systemic sclerosis in assiciated with better ascertainment of internal organ disease: a retrospective cohort study. QJM. 2010;103(2):109–15. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp174. Epub 2009 Dec 4.</p></div><br />


Review

For citations:


Ananyeva L.P. NEW CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA FOR SCLERODERMA SYSTEMATICA (a lecture). Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2013;51(5):539-544. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2013-1546

Views: 5682


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)