Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH STAGE II–III OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS. IMMEDIATE RESULTS AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE OUTCOME

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2017-668-674

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of OA. Medical treatment for OA does not provide the desired effect in a significant proportion of patients. With greater rates of knee OA and its rejuvenation, high tibial osteotomy (HTO) that can prolong the period of the patient’s own knee joint (KJ) function and postpone or completely avoid total knee arthroplasty is becoming increasingly relevant. Objective: to investigate the efficiency of HTO for stage II–III knee OA and the impact of age, body mass index (BMI), and correction angle on the immediate result of surgery. Subjects and methods. Thirty-five HTOs were carried out in 32 patients in 2003 to 2016. The male and female ratio was approximately 2:1. The patients’ mean age was 59.0±13.1 years; BMI, 29.04±3.57 kg/m2 , correction angle, 12.5±2.78°. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain; and the Knee Society Score (KSS) was employed to rate the functional and objective status of the KJ. The degenerative process was graded using the Kellgren–Lawrence radiographic classification. Results and discussion. HTO proved to be effective in patients with both Stage II and III knee OA. A year after surgery, there was a substantial reduction in VAS pain (from 72.27±11.79 to 7.72±6.62 mm) and an improvement in functional and objective KSS scores (from 43.66±11.5 and 54.39±11.77 to 86.51±10.86 and 81.93±6.65 mm, respectively). The results were excellent (36.4%), good (57.6%), and satisfactory (6%). No X-ray signs of progressive OA were revealed one year after surgery. BMI affected immediate results (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.34; p < 0.05). Thus, HTO has been established to be more effective in Stage II knee OA than in its Stage III. Age and correction angle do not affect immediate results while higher BMI is associated with worse outcomes and complications.

 

About the Authors

V. E. Byalik
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow
Russian Federation


S. A. Makarov
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow
Russian Federation


L. I. Alekseeva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow
Russian Federation


E. I. Byalik
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow
Russian Federation


S. V. Arkhipov
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow
Russian Federation


S. I. Glukhova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS. Osteoarthritis. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1998. P. 598.

2. Freitag J, Bates D, Boyd R, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the treatment of osteoarthritis: reparative pathways, safety and efficacy – a review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 26;17:230. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1085-9

3. Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, et al. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19(11):1270-85.

4. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009

5. Бадокин ВВ. Остеоартроз коленного сустава: клиника, диагностика, лечение. Современная ревматология. 2013;7(3):70-5 [Badokin VV. Knee osteoarthrosis: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2013;7(3):70-5 (In Russ.)].

6. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2013-277

7. Попова ЛА, Сазонова ВП. Структурная характеристика остеоартрозов нижних конечностей у жителей Курганской области, занятых в различных сферах деятельности. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2009;51(1):107-11 [Popova LA, Sazonova VP. Structural characteristics of lower limb osteoarthritis in Kurgan region residents, engaged in various fields of activity. Travmatologiya i Ortopediya Rossii. 2009;51(1):107-11 (In Russ.)].

8. Матвеев РП, Брагина СВ. Актуальность проблемы остеоартроза коленного сустава с позиции врача-ортопеда (обзор литературы). Вестник СПбГУ (Серия 11). 2014;(4):186-95 [Matveev RP, Bragina SV. The urgency of the problem of knee osteoarthritis from the position of an orthopedic physician (literature review). Vestnik SPbGU = Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University (Series 11). 2014;(4):186-95 (In Russ.)].

9. Esenkaya I, Unay K, Akan K. Proximal tibial osteotomies for the medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a historical journey. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2012 Apr; 7(1):13-21.

10. doi: 10.1007/s11751-012-0131-x

11. Spahn G, Klinger HM, Harth P, Hofmann GO. Cartilage regeneration after high tibial osteotomy. Results of an arthroscopic study. Z Orthop Unfall. 2012 Jun;150(3):272-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298388. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

12. Kanamiya T, Naito M, Hara M, Yoshimura I. The influences of biomechanical factors on cartilage regeneration after high tibial osteotomy for knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis: clinical and arthroscopic observations. Arthroscopy. 2002 Sep;18(7):725-9. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.35258

13. Sundaram NA, Hallett JP, Sullivan MF. Dome osteotomy of the tibia for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986 Nov;68-B(5). Available from: http://bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/content/jbjsbr/68-B/5/782.full.pdf

14. Bonasia DE, Dettoni F, Sito G, et al. Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment overload/arthritis in the varus knee. Amer J Sports Med. 2014;42(3).

15. doi: 10.1177/0363546513516577

16. Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S, et al. Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:170-80. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2087-2

17. Nelissen EM, van Langelaan EJ, Nelissen RGHH. Stability of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a failure analysis. Int Orthopaed (SICOT). 2010;34:217-23. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0723-3

18. Зайцева ЕМ, Алексеева ЛИ. Причины боли при остеоартрозе и факторы прогрессирования заболевания (обзор литературы). Научно-практическая ревматология. 2011;49(1):50-7

19. [Zaytseva EM, Alekseeva LI. The causes of pain in osteoarthrosis and the factors of disease progression (a review of literature). Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2011;49(1):50-7 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2011-867

20. Насонов ЕЛ, редактор. Ревматология. Российские клинические рекомендации. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2017. С. 456 [Nasonov EL, editor. Revmatologiya. Rossiiskie klinicheskie rekomendatsii [Rheumatology. Russian Clinical Recommendations]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. P. 456].

21. Su Chan Lee, Kwang Am Jung, Chang Hyun Nam, et al. The Short-term Follow-up Results of Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with Using an Aescula Open Wedge Plate and an Allogenic Bone Graft: The Minimum 1-Year Follow-up Results. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Mar;2(1):47-54. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.1.47

22. Asik M, Sen C, Kilic B, et al. High tibial osteotomy with Puddu plate for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:948-54. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0074-1

23. Dong Chul Lee, Seong Joon Byun. High Tibial Osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2012 Jun;24(2):61-9. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.2.61

24. Bode G, von Heyden J, Pestka J, et al. Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jul;23(7):1949-55.

25. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2762-y. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

26. Matthews LS, Goldstein SA, Malvitz TA, et al. Proximal tibial osteotomy. Factors that influence the duration of satisfactory function. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;229:193-200.

27. Chan RNW, Pollard JP. High tibial osteotomy for rheumatoid arthritis of the knee. A One to Six Year Follow-Up Study. Acta Orthop Wand. 1978;49:78-84. doi: 10.3109/17453677809005729

28. Benjamin A. Double osteotomy for the painful knee in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1969 Nov;51B(4):694-99.

29. Ahlberg A, Scham S, Unander-Scharin L. Osteotomy in degenerative and rheumatoid arthritis of the knee joint. Actn Orthop Scand. 1968;39:379-88. doi: 10.3109/17453676808989473

30. Devas MB. High tibial osteotomy for arthritis of the knee. A Method Specially Suitable for the Elderly. J Bone Joint Surg. 1969 Feb;51-B(I):95-9.

31. Coventry MB. Osteotomy of the upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg. 1965 Jul;47-A(5):984-90. doi: 10.2106/00004623-196547050-00008

32. Насонов ЕЛ, редактор. Ревматология. Клинические рекомендации. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2010. 752 с. [Nasonov EL, editor. Revmatologiya. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii [Rheumatology. Clinical Recommendations]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2010. 752 p.].

33. Насонов ЕЛ, редактор. Генно-инженерные биологические препараты в лечении ревматоидного артрита. Москва: ИМА-ПРЕСС; 2013. 549 с. [Nasonov EL, editor. Gennoinzhenernye biologicheskie preparaty v lechenii revmatoidnogo artrita. [Genetically engineered biological agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis]. Moscow: IMA-PRESS; 2013. 549 p.].

34. Smith TO, Sexton D, Mitchell P, Hing CB. Opening- and closing-wedged high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. The Knee. 2011;18:361-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.10.001

35. Spahn G, Hofmann GO, von Engelhardt LV, et al. The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):96-112. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1751-2

36. Brouwer RW, Jakma TSC, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, et al. Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;1:CD004019.

37. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004019.pub2


Review

For citations:


Byalik V.E., Makarov S.A., Alekseeva L.I., Byalik E.I., Arkhipov S.V., Glukhova S.I. HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH STAGE II–III OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS. IMMEDIATE RESULTS AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE OUTCOME. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(6):668-674. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2017-668-674

Views: 1253


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)