QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIOR OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURE
https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2018-48-54
Abstract
Objective: to analyze the dynamics of quality of life (QOL) in patients with prior osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture during an 18-month follow-up study.
Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 219 patients (mean age, 67.6 years) with vertebral fracture from seven centers of the Russian Federation. QOL was assessed four times using the EQ-5D (EuroQoL-5D) and TTO (Time Trade-Off) questionnaires during an 18-month prospective follow-up study. The work was done within the framework of the International Multicenter Study ICUROS (The International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study) organized by the International Osteoporosis Foundation (www.icuros.org).
Results and discussion. The patients with vertebral compression fracture showed a statistically significant decrease in QOL throughout the follow-up period. Immediately after the fracture, there was a dramatic decrease in the total EQ-5D score, followed by its gradual increase. However, the emerging trend in QOL recovery proved to be unstable, and by the end of the 18th month, it was significantly lower than that before the fracture. On the contrary, the TTO questionnaire showed that QOL drastically decreased immediately after fracture, but at month 4 it reached the level that was before the fracture, and remained stable until the end of the follow-up period.
Conclusion. The performed investigation enabled us to obtain data on QOL using the EQ-5D (QOL assessment from the social point of view) and TTO (individual QOL assessment) in the population of residents of the Russian Federation, in men and women aged 50 years and older with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.
About the Authors
A. G. SolodovnikovRussian Federation
Yekaterinburg.
O. M. Lesnyak
Russian Federation
Yekaterinburg; Saint Petersburg.
O. V. Dobrovolskaya
Russian Federation
Moscow.
K. Yu. Belova
Russian Federation
Yaroslavl.
Yu. A. Varavko
Russian Federation
Irkuts.
G. Sh. Golubev
Russian Federation
Rostov-on-Don.
V. A. Grebenshchikov
Russian Federation
Rostov-on-Don.
O. B. Ershova
Russian Federation
Yaroslavl.
E. G. Zotkin
Russian Federation
Moscow.
S. N. Ivanov
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg.
A. Yu. Kochish
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg.
L. V. Menshikova
Russian Federation
Yaroslavl.
K. P. Usenko
Russian Federation
Yekaterinburg.
References
1. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. WHO Tech Rep Ser. 1994;843:1-129.
2. Hallberg I. Health-Related Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporotic Fractures. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University; 2009. 92 p.
3. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jan;24(1):23-57. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
4. O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, et al. The prevalence of vertebral deformity in european men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11(7):1010-8.
5. Лесняк ОМ, Евстигнеева ЛП, Кузьмина ЛИ. Эпидемиология переломов позвоночника и периферических костей в старших возрастных группах жителей г. Екатеринбурга. Остеопороз и остеопатии. 1999;(2):2-4 [Lesnyak OM, Evstigneeva LP, Kuz'mina LI. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures and peripheral bones in older age groups of Ekaterinburg residents. Osteoporoz i Osteopatii. 1999;(2):2-4 (In Russ.)].
6. Михайлов ЕЕ, Беневоленская ЛИ. Эпидемиология остеопороза и переломов: руководство по остеопорозу. Москва: БИНОМ, Лаборатория знаний; 2003. С.10-54 [Mikhailov EE, Benevolenskaya LI. Epidemiologiya osteoporoza i perelomov: rukovodstvo po osteoporozu [Epidemiology of osteoporosis and fractures: a guide to osteoporosis]. Moscow: BINOM, Laboratoriya znanii; 2003. P.10-54].
7. Borgström F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, et al. Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int J. 2006;17(5):637-50. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-0015-8
8. Hiligsmann M, Evers SM, Ben Sedrine W, et al. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis. PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33(3):205-24. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0231-1
9. Добровольская ОВ, Торопцова НВ, Лесняк ОМ. Экономические аспекты осложненного остеопороза: стоимость лечения в течение первого года после перелома. Современная ревматология. 2016;10(3):29-34 [Dobrovolskaya OV, Toroptsova NV, Lesnyak OM. Economic aspects of complicated osteoporosis: The cost of treatment in the first year after fracture. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2016;10(3):29-34 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2016-3-29-34
10. Borgström F, Lekander I, Ivergard M, et al. The International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS) – quality of life during the first 4 months after fracture. Osteoporos Int J. 2013;24(3):811-23. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2240-2
11. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy (Amst Neth). 1996;37(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6
12. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, et al. A social tariff for EuroQoL: results from a UK general population survey (Discussion paper 138). University of York: Centre for Health Economics, 1995.
13. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A.Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316(7133):736-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.736
14. Burström K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. A comparison of individual and social time trade-off values for health states in the general population. Health Policy (Amst Neth). 2006;76(3):359-70. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.06.011
15. Zethraeus N, Johannesson M. A comparison of patient and social tariff values derived from the time trade-off method. Health Econ. 1999;8(6):541-5. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)10991050(199909)8:6<541::AID-HEC464>3.0.CO;2-8
16. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Electronic resource]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2015. URL: https://www.R-project.org/
17. WHO. Annex Table 3 Burden of disease in DALYs by cause, sex and mortality stratum in WHO regions, estimates for 2002 [Electronic resource]. The World Health Report; 2003. URL: http://www.who.int/whr/2003/en/Annex3-en.pdf (accessed: 26.08.2016).
18. Al-Sari UA, Tobias J, Clark E. Health-related quality of life in older people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int J. 2016;27:2891-900.
19. Zethraeus N, Johannesson M, Jönsson B. A computer model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of hormone replacement therapy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999;15(2):352-65.
20. Chrischilles E, Shireman T, Wallace R. Costs and health effects of osteoporotic fractures. Bone. 1994;15(4):377-86. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)90813-3
21. Jonsson B, Christiansen C, Johnell O, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Fracture Prevention in Established Osteoporosis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1996;25 Suppl 103:30-8. : 10.3109/03009749609103742
22. Hall SE, Criddle RA, Comito TL, Prince RL. A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int J. 1999;9(6):508-15. doi: 10.1007/s001980050178
23. Cooper C. The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. Am J Med. 1997;103(2A):12S-17S; discussion 17S-19S.
24. Cortet B, Houvenagel E, Puisieux F, et al. Spinal curvatures and quality of life in women with vertebral fractures secondary to osteoporosis. Spine. 1999;24(18):1921-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199909150-00010
25. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, et al. Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(11):1215-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.11.1215
26. Svensson HK, Olofsson EH, Karlsson J, et al. A painful, never ending story: older women's experiences of living with an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Osteoporos Int J. 2016;27:1729-36. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3445-y
27. Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Grove MR, et al. Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years. Osteoporos Int J. 2001;12(12):1042-9. doi: 10.1007/s001980170015
28. Si L, Winzenberg TM, de Graaff B, Palmer AJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life for osteoporosis-related conditions. Osteoporosis Int. 2014;25(8):1987-97. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2636-2
29. Добровольская ОВ, Торопцова НВ. Постменопаузальный остеопороз: качество жизни пациенток после переломов. Эффективная фармакотерапия. 2015;46:8-13 [Dobrovol'skaya OV, Toroptsova NV. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: quality of life of patients after fractures. Effektivnaya Farmakoterapiya. 2015;46:8-13 (In Russ.)].
30. Hagino H, Nakamura T, Fujiwara S, et al. Sequential change in quality of life for patients with incident clinical fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int J. 2009;20(5):695-702. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0761-5
Review
For citations:
Solodovnikov A.G., Lesnyak O.M., Dobrovolskaya O.V., Belova K.Yu., Varavko Yu.A., Golubev G.Sh., Grebenshchikov V.A., Ershova O.B., Zotkin E.G., Ivanov S.N., Kochish A.Yu., Menshikova L.V., Usenko K.P. QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIOR OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURE. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2018;56(1):48-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2018-48-54