Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

Instrumental diagnosis of coxitis in ankylosing spondylitis in real clinical practice

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2018-716-721

Abstract

Coxitis is one of the most common extra-axial manifestations of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Most Russian studies consider hip joint (HJ) involvement in AS patients as a major factor of poor prognosis in this disease. All detected hip joint changes are characterized by one term «coxitis». Until recently, there has been no clarity on inflammation of which structures of HJ leads to its destruction. This problem can be solved by prospective studies. A start was made by the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology on the study of the evolution of coxitis in AS in 2013. This communication is devoted to the results initially identified by various imaging techniques for detecting HJ changes.
Objective: to study the characteristics of HJ injury in AS, which have been detected by different imaging techniques.
Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 125 AS patients, including 84 men (a male/female ratio of 2:1). The mean age of the patients was 31.4±9.1 years; the mean age at disease onset – 24.6±4.4 years; the median duration of AS at the time of examination – 96 (12–444) months. The HLA-B27 antigen was present in the majority of patients (94%). AS activity defined by ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI was high; BASFI scores averaged 3.4±2.1. All the patients underwent the following instrumental examinations: plain pelvis radiography, HJ ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results and discussion. The clinical, ultrasound, and MRI signs of coxitis were found in 82, 75, and 88% of cases, respectively; coxitis was radiologically confirmed only in 50% of patients. This disease was diagnosed by several techniques in the vast majority of cases. The diagnosis of coxitis was based only on clinical signs in only three (2%) patients. In approximately every sixth (16%) patients with AS, who had clinical signs of coxitis, the latter was verified only by one of the instrumental techniques (ultrasonography, radiography, or MRI). Our findings demonstrated that more than half of patients had high coxitis activity, and more prolonged coxitis was responsible for higher X-ray HJ changes and functional limitations.
Conclusion. Our study has showed that the instrumental techniques used to diagnose coxitis are not equivalent in evaluating HJ injury. To decide which of them is more effective in screening and predicting the course of coxitis, there is a need for further prospective investigations.

About the Authors

E. M. Agafonova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
Russian Federation

34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.



T. V. Dubinina
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.


A. B. Demina
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.


A. V. Smirnov
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.


Sh. F. Erdes
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522.


References

1. Эрдес ШФ, Бочкова АГ, Дубинина ТВ и др. Проект рабочей классификации анкилозирующего спондилита. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2013;51(6):604-8 [Erdes ShF, Bochkova AG, Dubinina TV, et al. Project of working classification of ankylosing spondilytis. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2013;51(6):604-8 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2013-604-8

2. Волнухин ЕВ, Галушко ЕА, Бочкова АГ и др. Клиническое многообразие анкилозирующего спондилита в реальной практике врача-ревматолога в России (часть 1). Научно-практическая ревматология. 2012;50(2):44-9 [Volnukhin EV, Galushko EA, Bochkova AG, et al. Clinical diversity of ankylosing spondylitis in the real practice of a rheumatologist in Russia (Part 1). Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2012;50(2):44-9 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2012-1272

3. Brunner R, Kissling RO, Auckenthaler C, Fortin J. Clinical Evaluation of Ankylosing Spondylitis in Switzerland. Pain Physician. 2002 Jan;5(1):49-56.

4. Подряднова МВ, Балабанова РМ, Урумова ММ, Эрдес ШФ. Коксит при анкилозирующем спондилите: сопоставление клинических проявлений с данными ультразвукового исследования. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2014;52(4):417-22 [Podryadnova MV, Balabanova RM, Urumova MM, Erdes ShF. Coxitis in ankylosing spondylitis: Comparison of clinical manifestations with ultrasound study data. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2014;52(4):417-22 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2014-417-422

5. Дубинина ТВ, Дёмина АБ, Смирнов АВ, Эрдес ШФ. Диагностика коксита при анкилозирующем спондилите. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2015;53(6):624-31 [Dubinina TV, Dyomina AB, Smirnov AV, Erdes ShF. Diagnosis of coxitis in ankylosing spondylosis. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2015;53(6):624-31 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2015-624-631

6. Смирнов АВ, Эрдес ШФ. Оптимизация рентгенодиагностики анкилозирующего спондилита в клинической практике – значимость обзорного снимка таза. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2015;53(2):175-81 [Smirnov AV, Erdes ShF. Optimization of X-ray diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis in clinical practice: Importance of a plain X-ray film of the pelvis. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2015;53(2):175-81 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2015-175-181

7. Van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27:361-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780270401

8. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, et al. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286-91.

9. Lukas C, Landewe R, Sieper J, et al. Development of an ASASendorsed disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:18-24.

10. Дубинина ТВ, Гайдукова ИЗ, Годзенко АА и др. Рекомендации по оценке активности болезни и функционального состояния больных анкилозирующим спондилитом в клинической практике. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2017;55(4):344-50 [Dubinina TV, Gaidukova IZ, Godzenko AA, et al. Guidelines for the assessment of disease activity and functional status in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in clinical practice. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(4):344-50 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-344-350

11. Dwosh IL, Resnick D, Becker MA. Hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 1976;19:683-92. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(197607/08)19:4<683::AIDART1780190405>3.0.CO;2-8

12. Бочкова АГ, Левшакова АВ, Тюхова ЕЮ и др. Возможности магнито-резонансной томографии в ранней диагностике коксита у больных спондилоартритами. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2012;54(5):56-63 [Bochkova AG, Levshakova AV, Tyukhova EYu, et al. Magnetic-resonance imaging for early diagnosis of coxitis in patients with spondyloarthritis. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2012;50(5):56-63 (In Russ.)]. 10.14412/1995-4484-2012-1183

13. Cruyssen B, Munoz-Gomariz E, Font P, et al. Hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis: epidemiology and risk factors associated with hip replacement surgery. Rheumatology. 2010;49:73-81. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep174

14. Boonen A, Cruyssen BV, de Vlam K, et al. Spinal radiographic changes in ankylosing spondylitis: association with clinical characteristics and functional outcome. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1249-55. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080831


Review

For citations:


Agafonova E.M., Dubinina T.V., Demina A.B., Smirnov A.V., Erdes Sh.F. Instrumental diagnosis of coxitis in ankylosing spondylitis in real clinical practice. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2018;56(6):716-721. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2018-716-721

Views: 969


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)