Russian translation and validation of SarQoL® – quality of life questionnaire for patients with sarcopenia
https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2019-38-45
Abstract
The aim is to carry out language adaptation and validation on the Russian sample of a special SarQoL questionnaire, designed to assess the quality of life of elderly people with sarcopenia.
Material and methods. 100 patients over 65 years, mean age 74.0±6.5 years, observed on an outpatient basis were included. 50 from them had sarcopenia and 50 participants were without it. The diagnosis of sarcopenia was based on criteria developed by the European working group on sarcopenia (EWGSOP, 2010). The validation procedure was carried out in accordance with the Protocol.
Results and discussion. There was a significant decrease in the overall quality of life according to SarQoL questionnaire in patients with sarcopenia compared with the control group without sarcopenia (50.65±14.23 and 75.10±14.46, respectively; p<0.001). High internal consistency of the SarQoL (Cronbach's á coefficient 0.924) was revealed. A significant positive correlation of domains with the overall SarQoL index in the range from r=0.37, p=0.0083 to r=0.92, p<0.001 was established. Moderate correlations of SarQoL with some domains SF-36 and the EQ-5D questionnaires were revealed. High internal consistency (ICC) of 0.935 (95% CI 0.91-0.96) was found.
Conclusion. The Russian version of the SarQoL questionnaire is valid, consistent and reliable and can be used to assess the quality of life in older patients with sarcopenia.
About the Authors
Yu. A. SafonovaRussian Federation
41, Kirochnaya St., St. Petersburg 191015;
30, Bol'shaya Pod'yacheskaya St., St. Petersburg 190068
O. M. Lesnyak
Russian Federation
41, Kirochnaya St., St. Petersburg 191015;
30, Bol'shaya Pod'yacheskaya St., St. Petersburg 190068
I. A. Baranova
Russian Federation
1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997;
32, 11th Parkovaya St., Moscow 105077
A. K. Suleimanova
Russian Federation
1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997;
32, 11th Parkovaya St., Moscow 105077
E. G. Zotkin
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
References
1. Rosenberg I. Summary comments: epidemiological and methodological problems in determining nutritional status of older persons. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50(5):1231-3. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/50.5.1231
2. Woods JL, Iuliano-Burns S, King SJ, et al. Poor physical function in elderly women in low-level aged care is related to muscle strength rather than to measures of sarcopenia. Clin Intervent Aging. 2011;6:67-76. doi: 10.2147/cia.s16979
3. Cooper C, Dere W, Evans W, et al. Frailty and sarcopenia: definitions and outcome parameters. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(7):1839-48. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1913-1
4. Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, et al. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(8):755-63. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009520
5. Beaudart C, Rizzoli R, Bruyere O, et al. Sarcopenia: burden and challenges for Public Health. Arch Pub Health. 2014;72:45. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-45
6. Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, et al. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95(5):1851-60. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003
7. Janssen I. Influence of sarcopenia on the development of physical disability: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(1):56-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00540.x
8. Visser M, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevsky SB, et al. Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle fat infiltration as predictors of incident mobility limitations in well-functioning older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(3):324-33. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.3.324
9. Lang T, Streeper T, Cawthon P, et al. Sarcopenia: etiology, clinical consequences, intervention, and assessment. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(4):543-59. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1059-y
10. Rizzoli R, Reginster JY, Arnal JF, et al. Quality of life in sarcopenia and frailty. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93(2):101-20. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9758-y
11. Sayer AA, Dennison EM, Syddall HE, et al. Type 2 diabetes, muscle strength, and impaired physical function: the tip of the iceberg? Diabetes Care. 2005;28(10):2541-2. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2541
12. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age and Ageing. 2010;39(4):412-23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034
13. Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, et al. The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(5):547-58. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu010
14. Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ, et al. Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International Working Group on Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(4):249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.003
15. Anker SD, Morley JE, von Haehling S. Welcome to the ICD-10 code for sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(5):512-4. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12147
16. The WHOQoL Group. World Health Organization of Life Assessment (WHOQoL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k
17. Patel HP, Syddall HE, Jameson K, et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older people in the UK using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definition: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS). Age Ageing. 2013;42(3):378-84. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs197
18. Reginster J-Y, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, et al. Recommendations for the conduct of clinical trials for drugs to treat or prevent sarcopenia. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015;28(1):47-58. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0517-y
19. Beaudart C, Biver E, Reginster J-Y, et al. Development of a selfadministrated quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia in elderly subjects: the SarQoL. Age Ageing. 2015;44(6):960-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv133
20. Beaudart C, Biver E, Reginster J-Y, et al. Validation of SarQoL®, a specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;8(2):238-44. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12149
21. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
22. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
23. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
24. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory New York: McGrawHill Inc.; 1994. Available from: http://www.amazon.com/PsychometricTheory-Jum-C-Nunnally/dp/007047849X (accessed 18 May 2015).
25. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12(4):142S-158S. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(05)80019-4
26. Syddall HE, Martin HJ, Harwood RH, et al. The SF-36: a simple, effective measure of mobility-disability for epidemiological studies. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2009;13(1):57-62. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0010-4
27. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337-43. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087
28. Beaudart C, Edwards M, Moss C, et al. English translation and validation of the SarQoL®, a quality of life questionnaire specific for sarcopenia. Age Ageing. 2017;46(2):271-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw192
Review
For citations:
Safonova Yu.A., Lesnyak O.M., Baranova I.A., Suleimanova A.K., Zotkin E.G. Russian translation and validation of SarQoL® – quality of life questionnaire for patients with sarcopenia. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2019;57(1):38-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2019-38-45