Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate effect of methotrexate monotherapy (results of phase III MOBILITY study)

Objective: to study the efficacy and safety of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment with monoclonal antibodies to interleukin 6 receptors (IL6R) – sarilumab (SAR) in combination with methotrexate (MT).

Subjects and methods. The study included adult patients with moderate or severe RA and inadequate effect of MT monotherapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to subgroups receiving SAR (at doses of 150 or 200 mg) or placebo (PL) every 2 weeks in combination with a weekly intake of MT for 52 weeks. The primary endpoints of the study included the achievement of ACR20 after 24 weeks, the change of HAQ-DI after 16 weeks and assessment of radiological progression of joint destruction (modified total Sharp score mTSS) after 52 weeks.

Results and discussion. In general, the initial characteristics of patients were similar in all groups. A statistically significant improvement of all three primary endpoints was found in the groups of patients treated with SAR 150 and 200 mg compared to the group of PL. ACR20 response after 24 weeks was achieved in 53.6% (p<0.0005), 65.9 and 19.6% of patients respectively (p<0.0001), the average change in HAQ-DI after 16 weeks was 20.53; 20.55 and 20.29 respectively (p<0.0001); the average change in mTSS after 52 weeks was 0.49; 0.11 and 2.30, respectively (p<0.0001).

Conclusion. Both doses of SAR (150 and 200 mg every 2 weeks) in combination with MT demonstrated sustained clinical efficacy in patients with RA, which was confirmed by a significant improvement in symptomatic, functional and radiographic outcomes. SAR therapy was generally well tolerated. The adverse events observed in this study were consistent with the effects of the IL6 blockade.

1. Nasonov EL, Karateev DE, Balabanova RM. Rheumatoid arthritis. In: Nasonov EL, Nasonova VA, editors. Revmatologiya. Natsional'noe rukovodstvo [Rheumatology. National guidelines]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2008. P. 290-331 (In Russ.)]

2. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. New Engl J Med. 2012;365:2205-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965

3. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-.6736(16)30173-8

4. Nasonov EL, editor. Genno-inzhenernye biologicheskie preparaty v lechenii revmatoidnogo artrita [Genetically engineered biological drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis]. Moscow: IMA-PRESS; 2013 (In Russ.)

5. Hunter CA, Jones SA. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease.Nat Immunol. 2015;15:448-57. doi: 10.1038/ni1117-1271b

6. Liu X, Jones GW, Choy EH, Jones SA. The biology behind interleukin-6 targeted interventions. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2016;28:152-60. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000255

7. Calabrese LH, Rose-John S. IL-6 biology: implications for clinical targeting in rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10:720-7. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.127

8. Nasonov EL, Lila AM. Inhibition of interleukin 6 in immune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: achievements, prospects, and hopes. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(6):590-9 (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-590-599

9. Narazaki M, Tanaka T, Kishimoto T. The role and therapeutic targeting of IL-6 in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017 Jun;13(6):535-51. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2017.1295850

10. Liu X, Teichtahl AJ, Wicks IP. Interleukin-6 in rheumatoid arthritis – from the laboratory to the bedside. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(17):2187-97. doi: 10.2174/1381612821666150310143332

11. Garbers C, Heink S, Korn T, Rose-John S. Interleukin-6: designing specific therapeutics for a complex cytokine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018 Jun;17(6):395-412. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.45

12. Rubbert-Roth A, Furst DE, Nebesky JM, et al. A Review of Recent Advances Using Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Rheumatic Diseases. Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Jun;5(1):21-42. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0102-x

13. Nasonov EL, editor. Rossiiskie klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Revmatologiya [Russian clinical guidelines. Rheumatology]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. 464 p. (In Russ.)

14. Huizinga TW, Fleischmann RM, Jasson M, et al. Sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-6Ra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: efficacy and safety results from the randomised SARIL-RAMOBILITY Part A trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1626-34. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204405

15. Rafique A, Martin J, Blome M, et al. Evaluation of the binding kinetics and functional bioassay activity of sarilumab and tocilizumab to the human IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) a. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72 Suppl 3:797. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2360

16. Wang LH, Xue Y, Liu X, et al. Preclinical development of sarilumab, the first fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) against IL-6Ra: utilization and value of double humanized animal model. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72 Suppl 3:375. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1148

17. Zhang L, Luan B, Adler A, et al. Sarilumab (REGN88), a fullyhuman anti-IL6R antibody, inhibits tumor growth in preclinical models, as a single agent and in combination with the VEGF blocker aflibercept [abstract]. Cancer Res. 2012;72 Suppl 8:2723. doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2012-2723

18. Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Kivitz AJ, et al. Sarilumab plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III study. Arthritis Rheum. 2015;67:1424-37. doi: 10.1002/art.39093

19. Fleischmann R, van Adelsberg J, Lin Y, et al. Sarilumab and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Arthritis Rheum. 2017;69:277-90. doi: 10.1002/art.39944

20. Burmester GR, Lin YL, Patel R, et al. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:840-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310

21. Strand V, Kosinski M, Chen C, et al. Sarilumab plus methotrexate improves patient-reported outcomes in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate responses to methotrexate: results of a phase III trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:198. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1096-9

22. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315-24. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310302

23. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:729-40. doi: 10.1002/art.1780360601

24. Van der Heijde DM. How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method [corrected and republished in J Rheumatol. 2000;27:261-3]. J Rheumatol. 1999;26:743-5.

25. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23:137-45. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230202

26. Prevoo ML, van't Hof MA, Kuper HH, et al. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:44-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380107

27. Aletaha D, Nell VP, Stamm T, et al. Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:R796-806. doi: 10.1186/ar1740

28. Tarp SE, Furst D, Boers M, et al. Risk of serious adverse effects of biological and targeted drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review meta-analysis. Rheumatology. 2017 Mar 1;56(3):417-25. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew442

29. Singh JA, Cameron C, Noorbaloochi S, et al. Risk of serious infection in biological treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2015;386:258-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61704-9

30. Campbell L, Chen C, Bhagat SS, et al. Risk of adverse events including serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(3):552-62. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq343

31. Ramiro S, Sepriano A, Chatzidionysiou K, et al. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):1101-36. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210708

32. Rose-John S, Winthrop K, Calabrese L. The role of IL-6 in host defence against infections: immunobiology and clinical implications.Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;13(7):399-409. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.83

33. Smolen JS, Beaulieu A, Rubbert-Roth A, et al; OPTION Investigators. Effect of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (OPTION study): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet. 2008 Mar 22;371(9617):987-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60453-5

34. Emery P, Keystone E, Tony HP, et al. IL-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab improves treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor biologicals: results from a 24-week multicentre randomised placebocontrolled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1516-23. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.092932

35. Gabay C, Emery P, van Vollenhoven R, et al; ADACTA Study Investigators. Tocilizumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ADACTA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 4 trial. Lancet. 2013 May 4;381(9877):1541-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60250-0