Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

Efficacy and safety of a new original interleukin 17A inhibitor in the treatment of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a basic (BCD-085-3/AILAS) and extended (BCD-085-3ext/AILAS-II) phase II clinical trial

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2019-668-677

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a double-blind (BCD-085-3/AILAS) phase II clinical trial of the original interleukin 17A (IL17A) inhibitor BCD-085 prescribed at different doses to patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and those of an extended (BCD-085-3ext/AILAS-II) trial characterizing the efficacy and safety of this drug when used for a year.

The objective of the AILAS study is to determine the therapeutically effective and safe dose of BCD-085 in the treatment of active AS. The efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of BCD-085 during its annual use were additionally evaluated in the extended trial.

Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 89 patients diagnosed as having active (BASDAI scores >4.0; mean spinal pain scores >4.0) AS that met the 1984 New York classification criteria. After the end of the screening period, the patients were randomized at a ratio of 1:1:1:1 in one of four groups that received 40; 80 or 120 mg of BCD-085 subcutaneously or placebo on day 1 of weeks 0, 1, 2 and then once every two weeks up to week 12. The primary end point was the number of patients who achieved an ASAS20 response at week 16. The investigation evaluated the safety of the drug, by calculating the total incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) and the number of cases of premature therapy termination because of AEs.

Results and discussion. An ASAS20 response at week 16 was achieved in 72.7% of patients receiving 40 mg of BCD-085, in 81.8% of those receiving 80 mg, in 90.9% of those receiving 120 mg, and in 42.9% of cases in the placebo group (p=0.004). The superiority of BCD-085 over placebo was proven for 80- and 120-mg doses. The fastest and most pronounced effect was observed in patients treated with 120 mg of BCD-085. In the extended study, an ASAS20 response at week 52 was recorded in 86.4% of patients. One or more AEs during the first 16 weeks of therapy were reported in 11 (50.0%) patients of the 40-mg group; in 6 (27.3%) of the 80 mg group; in 4 (18.2%) of the 120 mg group and in 7 (31.8%) of the placebo group (p=0.183). The frequency and spectrum of AEs did not significantly differ in patients who received placebo and BCD-085 in different doses. No SAE was recorded.

Conclusion. Phase II study yielded data demonstrating the high efficacy and good tolerance of BCD-085 in the treatment of active AS. The best effect and optimal tolerance were demonstrated for a dose of 120 mg.

About the Authors

Sh. Erdes
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522


Competing Interests: not


V. I. Mazurov
I.I. Mechnikov NorthWestern State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

41, Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015


Competing Interests: not


T. V. Dubinina
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522


Competing Interests: not


I. Z. Gaydukova
I.I. Mechnikov NorthWestern State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

41, Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015


Competing Interests: not


S. A. Lapshina
Kazan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

49, Butlerov St., Kazan 420012


Competing Interests: not


E. V. Zonova
City Clinical Polyclinic One
Russian Federation

42, Serebrennikovskaya St., Novosibirsk 630099


Competing Interests: not


D. G. Krechikova
Regonal Hospital at the Smolensk Station, OAO «RZhD»
Russian Federation

15, First Krasnoflotsky Lane, Smolensk 214025


Competing Interests: not


T. V. Plaksina
N.A. Semashko Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

190, Rodionov St., Nizhny Novgorod 603126


Competing Interests: not


O. V. Reshetko
Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

1, Smirnovskoe Uschelie, Saratov 410053


Competing Interests: not


S. A. Smakotina
S.V. Belyaev Kemerovo Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

22a, Voroshilov St., Kemerovo 650029


Competing Interests: not


P. А. Shesternya
Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

1, Partisan Zheleznyak St, Krasnoyarsk 660022


Competing Interests: not


I. G. Gordeev
O.M. Filatov City Clinical Hospital Fifteen, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

23, Veshnyakovskaya St., Moscow 111539


Competing Interests: not


T. G. Makulova
Medical Research Institute, OOO
Russian Federation

22, Moskovsky Prospect, Saint Petersburg 190013


Competing Interests: not


T. V. Povarova
Railway Clinical Hospital at the Saratov II Station, OAO «RZhD»
Russian Federation

7, First Stantsionnyi Passage, Saratov 410004


Competing Interests: not


T. A. Raskina
Kemerovo State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

10, 50 Let Oktyabrya St., Kemerovo, 650099


Competing Interests: not


N. F. Soroka
City Clinical Hospital Nine
Belarus

8, Semashko St., Minsk, 220045


Competing Interests: not


A. M. Pristrom
City Clinical Hospital One
Belarus

64, Nezavisimost Pr., Minsk, 220013


Competing Interests: not


E. V. Kunder
City Clinical Hospital One
Belarus

64, Nezavisimost Pr., Minsk, 220013


Competing Interests: not


Yu. V. Usacheva
BIOCAD, ZAO
Russian Federation

Yulia Usacheva

34A, Svyaz St., Strelnya, Saint Petersburg 198515


Competing Interests: not


E. Yu. Stukalina
BIOCAD, ZAO
Russian Federation

34A, Svyaz St., Strelnya, Saint Petersburg 198515


Competing Interests: not


A. V. Eremeeva
BIOCAD, ZAO
Russian Federation

34A, Svyaz St., Strelnya, Saint Petersburg 198515


Competing Interests: not


E. V. Chernyaeva
BIOCAD, ZAO
Russian Federation

34A, Svyaz St., Strelnya, Saint Petersburg 198515


Competing Interests: not


R. A. Ivanov
BIOCAD, ZAO
Russian Federation

34A, Svyaz St., Strelnya, Saint Petersburg 198515


Competing Interests: not


References

1. Erdes ShF, Badokin VV, Bochkova AG, et al. On the terminology of spondyloarthritis. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya=Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2015;53(6):657-60 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2015-657-660

2. Erdes ShF, Rebrov AP, Dubinina TV, et al. Spondyloarthritis: modern terminology and definitions. Therapeutic Archive. 2019;91(5):84-8 (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/00403660.2019.05.000208

3. Sieper J, Braun J, Dougados M, Baeten D. Axial spondyloarthri-tis. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2015 Jul 9;1:15013. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.13

4. Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet. 2007;369(9570):1379-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60635-7

5. Landewe R, Dougados M, Mielants H, et al. Physical function in ankylosing spondylitis is independently determined by both disease activity and radiographic damage of the spine. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):863-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.091793

6. Lories R. The balance of tissue repair and remodeling in chronic arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7:700-7. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.156

7. Liu W, Wu YH, Zhang L, et al. Elevated serum levels of IL-6 and IL-17 may associate with the development of ankylosing spondylitis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(10):17362-76.

8. De Koning A, Schoones JW, van der Heijde D, van Gaalen FA. Pathophysiology of axial spondyloarthritis: consensus and controversies. Eur J Clin Invest. 2018;48(5):e12913. doi: 10.1111/eci.12913

9. Zambrano-Zaragoza JF, Agraz-Cibrian JM, Gonzalez-Reyes C, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis: from cells to genes. Int J Inflam. 2013;2013:501653. doi: 10.1155/2013/501653

10. Osta B, Lavocat F, Eljaafari A, Miossec P. Effects of interleukin-17A on osteogenic differentiation of isolated human mesenchymal stem cells. Front Immunol. 2014;5:425. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00425

11. Gravallese EM, Schett G. Effects of the IL-23—IL-17 pathway on bone in spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018;14:631-40. doi: 10.1038/s41584-018-0091-8

12. Schett G, Lories RJ, D’Agostino MA, et al. Enthesitis: from pathophysiology to treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 21;13(12):731-41. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.188

13. Gaidukova IZ, Rebrov AP, Lapshina SA, et al. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and biological agents for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritides. Recommendations of the Spondyloarthritis Study Group of Experts, All-Russian Public Organization «The Association of Rheumatology of Russia». Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(5):474-84 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-474-484

14. Lee J-W, Kang J-H, Yim Y-R, et al. Predictors of switching antitumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rosenbaum JT, ed. PLoSOne. 2015;10(7):e0131864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131864

15. Baraliakos X, Braun J, Deodhar A, et al. Secukinumab demonstrates low radiographic progression and sustained efficacy through 4 years in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:997-98. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.1396

16. Nasonov EL, Mazurov VI, Usacheva YuV, et al. Developments of Russian original biological agents for the treatment of immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(2):201-10 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-201-210

17. Baeten D, Sieper J, Braun J, et al. Secukinumab, an interleukin-17A inhibitor, in ankylosing spondylitis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2534-48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505066

18. Pappu R, Ramirez-Carrozzi V, Sambandam A. The interleukin-17 cytokine family: critical players in host defence and inflammatory diseases. Immunology. 2011 Sep;134(1):8-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03465.x

19. Baraliakos X, Braun J, Deodhar AA, et al. Long-term evaluation of secukinumab in ankylosing spondylitis: 5 year efficacy and safety results from a phase 3 trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum. 2018;70 Suppl 10. Available from: https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-evaluation-of-secukinumab-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-5-year-efficacy-and-safety-results-from-a-phase-3-trial/. Accessed November 8, 2018.

20. Martinis F, Caimmi C, Carletto A, et al. AB0833 Real-world efficacy and safety of secukinumab: data from verona’s cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1534-48. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.1799

21. Arbabi-Ghahroudi M. Camelid single-domain antibodies: Historical perspective and future outlook. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1589. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01589


Review

For citations:


Erdes Sh., Mazurov V.I., Dubinina T.V., Gaydukova I.Z., Lapshina S.A., Zonova E.V., Krechikova D.G., Plaksina T.V., Reshetko O.V., Smakotina S.A., Shesternya P.А., Gordeev I.G., Makulova T.G., Povarova T.V., Raskina T.A., Soroka N.F., Pristrom A.M., Kunder E.V., Usacheva Yu.V., Stukalina E.Yu., Eremeeva A.V., Chernyaeva E.V., Ivanov R.A. Efficacy and safety of a new original interleukin 17A inhibitor in the treatment of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a basic (BCD-085-3/AILAS) and extended (BCD-085-3ext/AILAS-II) phase II clinical trial. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2019;57(6):668-677. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2019-668-677

Views: 1002


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)