Degenerative and inflammatory hand joint changes in osteoarthritis according to magnetic resonance imaging

Erosive osteoarthritis (EOA) of the hand is an osteoarthritis (OA) phenotype that is characterized by central and marginal erosions of the articular surfaces in the distal and proximal interphalangeal (DIP and PIP) joints and in some cases by a fairly aggressive course with obvious pain syndrome and a high level of functional impairment. Diagnostic criteria and management tactics for EOA patients are still under investigation.

Objective: to evaluate the nature of the changes detected by hand joint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with EOA and non-erosive OA (NEOA) of the hand.

Subjects and methods. Examinations were made in 61 females meeting the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for hand OA; the patients' mean age was 66.34+5.79 years; the median age at disease onset was 50 [45; 56] years; the duration of pain was 15 [11; 20] years. All the patients underwent MRI of the second-fifth DIP, PIP, and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the right hand. The patients also filled out the AUSCAN questionnaire. EOA and NEOA were detected in 30 and 31 patients, respectively.

Results and discussion. The patients with EOA and those with NEOA were matched for gender, age, and disease duration. The DIP joints in patients with EOA were found to have significantly more frequently and a greater number of large osteophytes (OPs), (53 and 16%, respectively), joint space narrowing (JSN) (73 and 35%), degenerative collateral ligament changes (DCLCs) (93 and 55%), subluxations (47 and 13%), and bone marrow edema (BME) (57 and 19%) than in those with NEOA. Synovitides and subchondral cysts occurred with approximately the same frequency in EOA and NEOA. The PIP joints in patients with EOA significantly more frequently showed BME (37%) and DCLCs (97%) than in those with NEOA. Subluxations in the PIP joint of the right hand were encountered exclusively in patients with EOA. Their incidence was 17%. Degenerative symptoms (small, less often moderate sizes of OPs, JSN, and DCLCs) were identified with approximately the same frequency in both groups (p>0.05). The PIP joints in patients with EOA were significantly more often found to have BME (53 and 26%, respectively; (p<0.05), cortical defects (CDs) of the metacarpal head (73 and 45%) than in those with NEOA. The incidence of subchondral cysts, OPs, JSN, and DCLCs was not significantly different in both groups (p>0.05). Large OPs in the PIP joint were found relatively rarely. Subluxations in the PIP joints were undetected in both groups.

Conclusion. The symptoms of active inflammation are predominant and degenerative changes are more pronounced in patients with EOA unlike those with NEOA. Articular surface defects in the PIP joints in patients with hand OA differ from erosions in those with rheumatoid arthritis. These CDs in EOA are much more common than those in NEOA; however, the nature of their occurrence is unclear; therefore, the patients in whom they have been found need dynamic monitoring.

1. ACR. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Sep;43(9):1905-15. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200009)43:9<1905::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-P

2. Picavet HS, Hazes JM. Prevalence of self reported musculoskeletal diseases is high. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jul;62(7):644-50. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.7.644

3. Swagerty DL Jr., Hellinger D. Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2001 Jul 15;64(2):279-87.

4. Addimanda O, Mancarella L, Dolzani P. Clinical and radiographic distribution of structural damage in erosive and nonerosive hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2012 Jul;64(7):1046-53. doi: 10.1002/acr.21658

5. Kalichman L, Hernandez-Molina G. Hand osteoarthritis: An epidemiological perspective. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Jun;39(6):465-76. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2009.03.001

6. Senolt L. [Hand osteoarthritis]. CasLekCeskFall. 2016;155(6):305-9.

7. Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, et al. Review. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Nov;19(11):1270-85. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

8. Kuhn VC, Scarcella DS, Suzuki RM, et al. Prevalence and incidence of hand osteoarthritis and upper limb complaints in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Correlations among functionality, grip strength, changes in body mass index and symptoms among patients in an educational osteoarthritis program. Open J Orthoped. 2016;6:1-9. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2016.61001

9. Damman W, Liu R, Bloem JL, et al. Bone marrow lesions and synovitis on MRI associate with radiographic progression after 2 years in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Dec 1. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.11.007

10. Kloppenburg M, Kwok W-Y. Hand osteoarthritis — a heterogeneous disorder. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011 Nov 22;8(1):22-31. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.170

11. Punzi L, Ramonda R, Sfriso P. Erosive osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2004 Oct;18(5):739-58. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2004.05.010

12. Wilder FV, Barrett JP, Farina IJ. Joint-specific prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hand. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Sep;14(9):953-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.04.013

13. Liu R, Damman W, Reijnierse M, et al. Bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in hand osteoarthritis are associated with pain and interact with synovitis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Jul;25(7):1093-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.790

14. Caspi D, Flusser G, Farber I, et al. Clinical, radiologic, demographic, and occupational aspects of hand osteoarthritis in the elderly. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2001;30:321-31 doi: 10.1053/sarh.2001.19957

15. Haugen IK, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Boyesen P, et al. Synovitis and radiographic progression in non-erosive and erosive hand osteoarthritis: is erosive hand osteoarthritis a separate inflammatory phenotype? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24:647-54. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.11.014

16. Bijsterbosch J, Watt I, Meulenbelt I, et al. Clinical and radiographic disease course of hand osteoarthritis and determinants of outcome after 6 years. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:68-73. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.133017

17. Haugen IK, Lillegraven S, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, et al. Hand osteoarthritis and MRI: development and first validation step of the proposed Oslo Hand Osteoarthritis MRI score. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1033-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.144527

18. Kudinsky DM, Smirnov AV, Alekseeva LI. Comparison of radiography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2019;57(1):91-9 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2019-91-99

19. Hutton CW, Higgs ER, Jackson PC, et al. ,,mTc-HMDP bone scanning in generalised osteoarthritis I: comparison of standard radiographs and four hour bone scan image of the hand. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986;45:617-21. doi: 10.1136/ard.45.8.617

20. Alexander CJ. Heberden's and Bouchard's nodes. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58:675-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.11.675

21. Dahaghin S, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Hazes JM, Koes BW. Clinical burden of radiographic hand osteoarthritis: a systematic appraisal. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:636-47. doi: 10.1002/art.22109

22. Kortekaas MC, Kwok WY, Reijnierse M, et al. Osteophytes and joint space narrowing are independently associated with pain in finger joints in hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Oct;70(10):1835-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.147553

23. Buckland-Wright C. Subchondral bone changes in hand and knee osteoarthritis detected by radiography. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12 Suppl A:S10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2003.09.007

24. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494-502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494

25. Tan AL, Toumi H, Benjamin M, et al. Combined high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and histological examination to explore the role of ligaments and tendons in the phenotypic expression of early hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1267-72. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.050112

26. Kwok WY, Kloppenburg M, Rosendaal FR, et al. Erosive hand osteoarthritis: its prevalence and clinical impact in the general population and symptomatic hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1238-42. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.143016

27. Grainger AJ, Farrant JM, O'Connor PJ, et al. MR imaging of erosions in interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis: is all osteoarthritis erosive? Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:737-45. doi: 10.1007/s00256-007-0287-5

28. Marshall M, Nicholls E, Kwok W-Y, et al. Erosive osteoarthritis: a more severe form of radiographic hand osteoarthritis rather than a distinct entity? Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):136-41. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203948

29. Altman RD, Hochberg M, Murphy WA, et al. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995;3 Suppl A:3-70. doi: 10.1016/S1063-4584(07)60423-3

30. Haugen IK, Boyesen P, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, et al. Associations between MRI-defined synovitis, bone marrow lesions and structural features and measures of pain and physical function in hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun;71(6):899-904. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200341

31. Dahaghin S, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ, et al. Prevalence and pattern of radiographic hand osteoarthritis and association with pain and disability (the Rotterdam study). Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):99-104. Erratum in: Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Mar;64(3):516.

32. Haugen IK, Englund M, Aliabadi P, et al. Prevalence, incidence and progression of hand osteoarthritis in the general population: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1581-96. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.150078

33. Cavasin F, Punzi L, Ramonda R, et al. Prevalence of erosive osteoarthritis of the hand in a population from Venitian area. Reumatismo. 2004;56:19-23. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2004.46