Diagnostic value of the SARC-f questionnaire and muscle strength tests for the detection of sarcopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2020-678-682
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic significance of the SARC-F (A Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia) questionnaire for sarcopenia screening and tests for assessing muscle strength in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Material and methods. The study included 87 women aged 40-75 years who completed the SARC-F screening questionnaire. All patients underwent muscle strength assessment tests - wrist dynamometry and “Rising from a chair”, as well as dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to quantify muscle mass. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were determined for the SARC-F questionnaire and muscle strength tests.
Results. Significant sarcopenia was diagnosed in 20 (23%) women. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the SARC-F questionnaire was 30, 42 and 39%, respectively, of the wrist dynamometry - 95, 34 and 48%, of the “Rising from a chair” test - 50, 21 and 28%, respectively. Paired use of different combinations of tests did not lead to an improvement in diagnostic value. With all three tests, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were 71, 20, and 33%, respectively.
Conclusion. The SARC-F questionnaire used to screen for sarcopenia has a rather low diagnostic value for identifying patients with rheumatoid arthritis in need of further evaluation. Among muscle strength tests, hand dynamometry was found to be a highly sensitive, but insufficiently specific method, which can lead to overdiagnosis of probable sarcopenia. All this indicates the need to develop a screening method specific for rheumatoid arthritis and to improve the methods of stage I of sarcopenia diagnosis.
About the Authors
N. V. ToroptsovaRussian Federation
Natalia V. Toroptsova
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
Competing Interests: not
O. V. Dobrovolskaya
Russian Federation
Olga V. Dobrovolskaya
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
Competing Interests: not
A. O. Efremova
Russian Federation
Arina O. Efremova
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
Competing Interests: not
O. A. Nikitinskaya
Russian Federation
Oksana A. Nikitinskaya
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
Competing Interests: not
References
1. Rosenberg I.H. Summary comments. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50(5):1231-1233. DOI: 10.1093/AJCN/50.5.1231
2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age and Ageing. 2010;39 (4):412-423. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq034
3. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age and Ageing. 2019;48(1):16-31. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy169
4. Malmstrom T, Morley J. SARC-F: A Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(8):531-532. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.018
5. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1580-1588. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2010.138461
6. Krzymiiiska-Siemaszko R, Deskur-Smielecka E, Kaluzniak-Szymanowska A, et al. Comparison of diagnostic performance of SARC-F and its two modified versions (SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM) in community-dwelling older adults from Poland. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:583-594. DOI: 10.2147/cia.s250508
7. Mienche M, Setiati S, Setyohadi B, et al. Diagnostic performance of calf circumference, thigh circumference, and SARC-F Questionnaire to identify sarcopenia in elderly compared to Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia’s Diagnostic Standard. Acta Med Indones. 2019;51(2):117-127.
8. Yang M, Hu X, Xie L, et al. Screening sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: SARC-F vs SARC-F combined with calf circumference (SARC-CalF). J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19(3):277.e1-277.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.12.016
9. Miller J, Wells L, Nwulu U, et al. Validated screening tools for the assessment of cachexia, sarcopenia, and malnutrition: A systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108(6):1196-1208. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy244
10. Kurita N, Wakita T, Kamitani T, et al. SARC-F validation and SARC-F+EBM derivation in musculoskeletal disease: The SPSS-OK Study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(8):732-738. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-019-1222-x
11. Suleymanova AK. Safonova YuA. Baranova IA. Frequency of sarcopenia in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Comparison of diagnostic algorithms of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in the Elderly (2010 and 2018 revisions). Pulmonologiya. 2019;29(5):564-570 (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-201929-5-564-570
12. Vlietstra L, Stebbings S, Meredith-Jones K, et al. Sarcopenia in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: The association with self-reported fatigue, physical function and obesity. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(6):e0217462. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217462
13. Beenakker K, Ling C, Meskers C, et al. Patterns of muscle strength loss with age in the general population and patients with a chronic inflammatory state. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;9(4):431-436. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.05.005
Review
For citations:
Toroptsova N.V., Dobrovolskaya O.V., Efremova A.O., Nikitinskaya O.A. Diagnostic value of the SARC-f questionnaire and muscle strength tests for the detection of sarcopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020;58(6):678-682. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2020-678-682