Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

Evaluation of the effectiveness of Tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice: The relationship between pain relief in the first 4 weeks and disease activity after 3–6 months

https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2021-394-400

Abstract

The JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (TOFA) blocks the intracellular signaling pathway that activates the synthesis of cytokines and mediators involved in the development of pain and central sensitization (CS), which determines the rapid analgesic effect. However, it is not clear how pain reduction is associated with achieving low activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between the early clinical response to tofacitinib and a decrease in rheumatoid arthritis activity after 3 and 6 months.

Material and methods. The study group consisted of 88 RA patients (age – 53±11.5 years; 79.3% of women) who received basic anti-inflammatory drugs (59.5% – methotrexate, 19.8% – leflunomide) and who were prescribed TOFA in a dose 10 mg/day. Seropositivity for rheumatoid factor was 89.8%; the value of the DAS28 index is 5.2±1.2. The severity of pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire, the neuropathic component of pain (NCP) – using the PainDETECT questionnaire, signs of CS – using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) questionnaire in the early stages after the administration of TOFA, RA activity – using the DAS28-CRP index after 3 and 6 months.

Results. The mean severity of pain at baseline was 5.3±2.0 on the visual analogue scale (VAS); 51.1% of patients had signs of CS (CSI>40), 15.9% had NCP (PainDETECT>18). 7 days after the start of therapy, there was a significant decrease in pain – to 4.1±1.8 according to VAS (p<0.05) and CS – 40.4±13.5 to 36.5±12.5 according to CSI (p=0.01). After 28 days, the effect was even more significant: the level of pain according to the VAS was 2.8±1.6 (p=0.000), the NCP decreased from 11.8±5.6 to 6.8±3.1 (p=0.000), CS – up to 31.6±13.9 (p=0.000). The value of the DAS28-CRP index after 3 and 6 months was 3.7±1.3 and 3.6±1.2, respectively. The number of patients with pain relief ≥50% after 28 days was 59.9%, low RA activity after 3 months. (DAS28-CRP≤3.2) was acieved in 64.4% of patients. There was a clear correlation between the number of patients with a pain reduction of ≥50% at 28 days and the number of patients who achieved low RA activity at 3 and 6 months. (rS=0.548, p=0.000 and rS=0.790, p=0.000). 6 patients dropped out of the study due to inefficiency or social reasons. No serious adverse reactions were noted.

Conclusions. The use of the JAK inhibitor TOFA allows achieving a quick analgesic effect and reducing the signs of CS. An early clinical response to TOFA (pain relief) predicts a decrease in RA activity after 3 and 6 months of therapy.

About the Authors

A. E. Karateev
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

115522, Russian Federation, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



E. Yu. Pogozheva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

115522, Russian Federation, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



V. N. Amirjanova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

115522, Russian Federation, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



E. S. Filatova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

115522, Russian Federation, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



A. M. Lila
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

115522, Russian Federation, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A

125993, Russian Federation, Moscow, Barrikadnaya str., 2/1, building 1



V. I. Mazurov
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

191015, Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41



R. R. Samigullina
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

191015, Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41



A. M. Dadalova
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

191015, Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41



A. Yu. Dyo
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

191015, Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41



D. S. Chakieva
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

191015, Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41



A. A. Baranov
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Russian Federation

150000, Russian Federation, Yaroslavl, Revolyutsionnaya str., 5



N. A. Lapkina
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Russian Federation

150000, Russian Federation, Yaroslavl, Revolyutsionnaya str., 5



E. N. Koltsova
Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of Moscow Health Care Department
Russian Federation

109029, Russian Federation, Moscow, Srednyaya Kalitnikovskaya str., 28/1



N. A. Kiryukhina
National Medical and Surgical Center named after N.I. Pirogov
Russian Federation

105203, Russian Federation, Moscow, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya str., 70



I. N. Shchendrigin
Stavropol Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

355030, Russian Federation, Stavropol, Semashko str., 1



T. G. Rasevich
Aleksandro-Mariinskaya Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

414056, Russian Federation, Astrakhan, Tatishcheva str., 2



A. F. Davydova
Research Institute – Professor S.V. Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital N 1
Russian Federation

350901, Russian Federation, Krasnodar, Pervogo Maya str., 167



I. V. Semizarova
Research Institute – Professor S.V. Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital N 1
Russian Federation

350901, Russian Federation, Krasnodar, Pervogo Maya str., 167



I. A. Shafieva
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

188930, Russian Federation, Samara, Chapaevskaya str., 89



I. B. Bashkova
Chuvash State University
Russian Federation

428003, Russian Federation, Cheboksary, Moskovskiy avenue, 9



D. A. Bobrikova
Tyumen Regional Clinical Hospital N 1
Russian Federation

625023, Russian Federation, Tyumen, Kotovskogo str., 55



D. A. Murtazalieva
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Russian Federation

111123, Russian Federation, Moscow, Entuziastov Highway, 86



I. N. Kushnir
S.V. Belyaev Kuzbass Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

650066, Russian Federation, Kemerovo, Oktyabrsky avenue, 22



E. V. Kalinina
Volgograd State Medical University
Russian Federation

400131, Russian Federation, Volgograd, Pavshikh Bortsov square, 1



T. S. Salnikova
Tula Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

300053, Russian Federation, Tula, Yablochkova str., 1A



I. M. Marusenko
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation

185000, Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk, Lenina avenue, 33



O. V. Semagina
V.D. Seredavin Samara Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

443095, Russian Federation, Samara, Tashkentskaya str., 157



I. B. Vinogradova
Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

432970, Russian Federation, Ulyanovsk, Lva Tolstogo str., 42



D. G. Krechikova
Smolensk State Medical University
Russian Federation

214019, Russian Federation, Smolensk, Krupskoy str., 28



M. Yu. Semchenkova
Smolensk State Medical University
Russian Federation

214019, Russian Federation, Smolensk, Krupskoy str., 28



E. L. Nasonov
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

115522, Russian Federation, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



References

1. Nasonov EL, Avdeeva AS, Lila AM. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (Part I). Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020;58(1):62-79 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2020-62-79

2. Wang F, Sun L, Wang S, Davis JM 3rd, Matteson EL, Murad MH, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(7):1404-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.01.039

3. Strand V, Kaine J, Alten R, Wallenstein G, Diehl A, Shi H, et al. Associations between Patient Global Assessment scores and pain, physical function, and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 trials of tofacitinib. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02324-7

4. Hiligsmann M, Rademacher S, Kaal KJ, Bansback N, Harrison M. The use of routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48(3):357-366. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.03.006

5. Ogdie A, de Vlam K, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Baer P, Lukic T, et al. Efficacy of tofacitinib in reducing pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis. RMD Open. 2020;6(1):e001042. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001042

6. Crispino N, Ciccia F. JAK/STAT pathway and nociceptive cytokine signalling in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39(3):668-675.

7. Seifert O, Baerwald C. Interaction of pain and chronic inflammation. Z Rheumatol. 2021;80(3):205-213. doi: 10.1007/s00393-020-00951-8

8. Adami G, Gerratana E, Atzeni F, Benini C, Vantaggiato E, Rotta D, et al. Is central sensitization an important determinant of functional disability in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritides? Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021;13:1759720X21993252. doi: 10.1177/1759720X21993252

9. Karateev AE, Filatova ES, Pogozheva EYu, Amirjanova VN, Nasonov EL, Lila AM, et al. A very early clinical response to treatment with the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the dynamics of pain and central sensitization elements. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2020;14(2):69-75 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2020-2-69-75

10. Zhilyaev EV, Lukina GV, Koltsova EN, Shmidt EI, Lytkina KA. Clinical significance of the direct analgesic effect of targeted medications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Russian Medical Review. 2020;4(8):483-486 (In Russ.). doi: 10.32364/2587-6821-2020-4-8-483-486

11. Karateev DE, Luchikhina EL. The role of targeted synthetic drugs in the treatment of rheumatic diseases: focus on tofacitinib. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2020;(2):83-94 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2020-2-83-94

12. Harrington R, Al Nokhatha SA, Conway R. JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: An evidence-based review on the emerging clinical data. J Inflamm Res. 2020;13:519-531. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S219586

13. Fautrel B, Kirkham B, Pope JE, Takeuchi T, Gaich C, Quebe A, et al. Effect of baricitinib and adalimumab in reducing pain and improving function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in low disease activity: Exploratory analyses from RA-BEAM. J Clin Med. 2019;8(9):1394. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091394

14. Corominas H, Alegre C, Narváez J, Fernández-Cid CM, Torrente- Segarra V, Gómez MR, et al. Correlation of fatigue with other disease related and psychosocial factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab: ACT-AXIS study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(26):e15947. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015947

15. Strand V, Kremer JM, Gruben D, Krishnaswami S, Zwillich SH, Wallenstein GV. Tofacitinib in combination with conventional disease- modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Patient-reported outcomes from a phase III randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017;69(4):592-598. doi: 10.1002/acr.23004


Review

For citations:


Karateev A.E., Pogozheva E.Yu., Amirjanova V.N., Filatova E.S., Lila A.M., Mazurov V.I., Samigullina R.R., Dadalova A.M., Dyo A.Yu., Chakieva D.S., Baranov A.A., Lapkina N.A., Koltsova E.N., Kiryukhina N.A., Shchendrigin I.N., Rasevich T.G., Davydova A.F., Semizarova I.V., Shafieva I.A., Bashkova I.B., Bobrikova D.A., Murtazalieva D.A., Kushnir I.N., Kalinina E.V., Salnikova T.S., Marusenko I.M., Semagina O.V., Vinogradova I.B., Krechikova D.G., Semchenkova M.Yu., Nasonov E.L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice: The relationship between pain relief in the first 4 weeks and disease activity after 3–6 months. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2021;59(4):394–400. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2021-394-400

Views: 507


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)