Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

The use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis during the COVID-19 coronavirus disease pandemic: data from a telephone survey of 254 patients

https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2022-149-156

Abstract

The prescribing of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (iJAK) during the COVID-19 pandemic requires a balanced approach and tight monitoring of the patients.

The aim of the study was to study the effect of bDMARDs and iJAK inhibitors on the condition of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), taking the patients reported outcomes, as well as the incidence of COVID-19 in these patients.

Materials and methods. A telephone survey was conducted of 254 patients with RA (average age – 49.8±13.7 years; 64.4% of patients are positive for rheumatoid factor; women – 83.5%; DAS28 score – 5.4±1.6 points), who in the period from January 2020 to June 2021 were prescribed bDMARDs or iJAK for the first time: 148 (58.3%) – rituximab; 57 (22.4%) – tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors; 20 (7.9%) – iJAK; 17 (6.7%) – interleukin 6 inhibitors; 12 (4.7%) – abatacept.

Results. At the time of the survey, 204 (80.3%) patients continued taking prescribed medications. The main reason for the interruption of treatment was administrative problems. Synthetic DMARDs (mainly methotrexate and leflunomide) were received by 68.0%, glucocorticoids – 45.3%, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs – 44.5% of respondents. Among patients treated with bDMARDs or iJAK, 68.1% noted «the state of symptoms acceptable to the patient», the absence of frequent joint pain – 65.3%, the absence of increased fatigue – 14.3%. The incidence of COVID-19 and hospitalization associated with this disease did not differ in individuals who continued and stopped using bDMARDs or iJAK: 41.2% and 44.6%, 13.7% and 14.0%, respectively (p=0.80884). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of COVID-19 and hospitalization associated with this disease in patients taking various bDMARDs or iJAK.

Conclusion. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, rituximab remains one of the most popular bDMARDs. About a third of patients receiving bDMARDs or iJAK are not satisfied with their condition. More than 40% of patients who received these drugs suffered COVID-19; 14.0% required hospitalization.

About the Authors

A. E. Karateev
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Andrey E. Karateev

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A


Competing Interests:

Авторы не получали гонорар за статью



E. Yu. Polishchuk
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Elena Yu. Polishchuk

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A


Competing Interests:

Авторы не получали гонорар за статью



A. S. Potapova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Alena S. Potapova

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A


Competing Interests:

Авторы не получали гонорар за статью



E. V. Matyanova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Elena V. Matyanova

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A


Competing Interests:

Авторы не получали гонорар за статью



A. S. Semashko
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Anna S. Semashko

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A


Competing Interests:

Авторы не получали гонорар за статью



А. O. Bobkova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

Anastasia O. Bobkova

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



E. S. Filatova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Ekaterina S. Filatova

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A


Competing Interests:

Авторы не получали гонорар за статью



V. N. Amirjanova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

Vera N. Amirjanova

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



S. I. Glukhova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Svetlana I. Glukhova

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A


Competing Interests:

Авторы не получали гонорар за статью



E. G. Zotkin
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Evgeniy G. Zotkin

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A


Competing Interests:

Авторы не получали гонорар за статью



A. M. Lila
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Alexander M. Lila

125993, Moscow, Barrikadnaya str., 2/1, building 1; 115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A


Competing Interests:

Авторы не получали гонорар за статью



References

1. Nasonov EL (ed.). Russian clinical recommendations. Rheumatology. Moscow:GEOTAR-Media;2020 (In Russ.).

2. Nasonov EL, Olyunin YuA, Lila AM. Rheumatoid arthritis: The problems of remission and therapy resistance. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2018; 56(3):363-271 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2018-263-271

3. Michaud K, Pope J, van de Laar M, Curtis JR, Kannowski C, Mitchell S, et al. Systematic literature review of residual symptoms and an unmet need in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021;73(11):1606-1616. doi: 10.1002/acr.24369

4. Aletaha D, Wang X, Zhong S, Florentinus S, Monastiriakos K, Smolen JS. Differences in disease activity measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who achieved DAS, SDAI, or CDAI remission but not Boolean remission. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50(2):276-284. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.09.005

5. Lee YC, Cui J, Lu B, Frits ML, Iannaccone CK, Shadick NA, et al. Pain persists in DAS28 rheumatoid arthritis remission but not in ACR/EULAR remission: A longitudinal observational study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(3):R83. doi: 10.1186/ar3353

6. Chevallard M, Belloli L, Ughi N, Adinolfi A, Casu C, Di Cicco M, et al. Use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with inflammatory arthritis: A retrospective study on feasibility and impact on patient-reported outcomes in a real-life setting. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41(7):1253-1261. doi: 10.1007/s00296021-04863-x

7. Ferucci ED, Day GM, Choromanski TL, Freeman SL. Outcomes and quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis with or without video telemedicine follow-up visits. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022;74(3):484-492. doi: 10.1002/acr.24485

8. Patient’s reported outcomes – a new philosophy for analyzing the effectiveness of therapy in immunoinflammatory diseases. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2021;15(5):121-127 (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2021-5-121-127

9. Eberhard A, Bergman S, Mandl T, Olofsson T, Rydholm M, Jacobsson L, et al. Predictors of unacceptable pain with and without low inflammation over 5 years in early rheumatoid arthritis – An inception cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02550-7

10. Katchamart W, Narongroeknawin P, Suppa-Udom B, Chanapai W, Srisomnuek A. Factors associated with and cutoff points for Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(3):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04860-3

11. Aouad K, Gaudin P, Vittecoq O, Morel J, Berthelot JM, Senbel E, et al. Cut-off value to identify a flare using the Flare Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis (FLARE-RA) questionnaire: Analysis of the TOSCA study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;61(1):337-344. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab261

12. Ferri C, Giuggioli D, Raimondo V, L’Andolina M, Tavoni A, Cecchetti R, et al.; COVID-19 & ASD Italian Study Group. COVID-19 and rheumatic autoimmune systemic diseases: Report of a large Italian patients series. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(11):31953204. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05334-7

13. Ciurea A, Papagiannoulis E, Bürki K, von Loga I, Micheroli R, Möller B, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the disease course of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: Results from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(2):238-241. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218705

14. Colls J, Lee YC, Xu C, Corrigan C, Lu F, Marquez-Grap G, et al. Patient adherence with a smartphone app for patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(1):108-112. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa202

15. Nasonov EL, Lila AM. Rituximab and other anti-B-cell agents in immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy. 2019; 28(1):7-17 (In Russ.). doi: 10.32756/0869-5490-2019-1-7-17

16. Kusevich DA, Avdeeva AS. The efficacy and safety of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: New evidence. NauchnoPrakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(4):420-428 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017420-428

17. Boekel L, Wolbink GJ. Rituximab during the COVID-19 pandemic: Time to discuss treatment options with patients. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022;4(3):e154-e155. doi: 10.1016/S26659913(21)00418-5

18. Andersen KM, Bates BA, Rashidi ES, Olex AL, Mannon RB, Patel RC, et al.; National COVID Cohort Collaborative Consortium. Long-term use of immunosuppressive medicines and in-hospital COVID-19 outcomes: A retrospective cohort study using data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022;4(1):e33-e41. doi: 10.1016/S26659913(21)00325-8

19. Jena A, Mishra S, Deepak P, Kumar MP, Sharma A, Patel YI, et al. Response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immune mediated inflammatory diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2022;21(1):102927. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102927

20. Nasonov EL, Lila AM, Mazurov VI, Belov BS, Karateev AE, Dubinina TV, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Recommendations of the Association of Rheumatologists of Russia. NauchnoPrakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2021;59(3):239-254. (In Russ.). doi: 10.47360/19954484-2021-239-254

21. Kilic L, Erden A, Bingham CO 3rd, Gossec L, Kalyoncu U. The reporting of patient-reported outcomes in studies of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of 250 articles. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(7):1300-1305. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.151177

22. Jansen JP, Buckley F, Dejonckheere F, Ogale S. Comparative efficacy of biologics as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs – A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:102. doi: 10.1186/14777525-12-102

23. Gwinnutt JM, Hyrich KL, Lunt M; RAMS Co-Investigators, Barton A, Verstappen SMM. Long-term outcomes of patients who rate symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis as ‘satisfactory’. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(8):1853-1861. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez497

24. Almeida C, Choy EH, Hewlett S, Kirwan JR, Cramp F, Chalder T, et al. Biologic interventions for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(6):CD008334. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008334.pub2

25. Barra L, Ha A, Sun L, Fonseca C, Pope J. Efficacy of biologic agents in improving the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score in established and early rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis with indirect comparisons. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(3):333-341.

26. Strand V, Kaine J, Alten R, Wallenstein G, Diehl A, Shi H, et al. Associations between Patient Global Assessment scores and pain, physical function, and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 trials of tofacitinib. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02324-7

27. Harrold LR, John A, Best J, Zlotnick S, Karki C, Li Y, et al. Impact of rituximab on patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the US Corrona Registry. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(9):2135-2140. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3742-2

28. Nasonov EL, Belov BS, Lila AM, Aronova ES, Gridneva GI, Kudryavtseva AV, et al. Course and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases: Preliminary data from the NIIR/APPCOVID-19 registry and literature review. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2021;59(6):666675 (In Russ.) doi: 10.47360/1995-4484-2021-666-675

29. Bower H, Frisell T, di Giuseppe D, Delcoigne B, Ahlenius GM, Baecklund E, et al.; ARTIS Study Group. Effects of the COVID19 pandemic on patients with inflammatory joint diseases in Sweden: From infection severity to impact on care provision. RMD Open. 2021;7(3):e001987. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001987


Review

For citations:


Karateev A.E., Polishchuk E.Yu., Potapova A.S., Matyanova E.V., Semashko A.S., Bobkova А.O., Filatova E.S., Amirjanova V.N., Glukhova S.I., Zotkin E.G., Lila A.M. The use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis during the COVID-19 coronavirus disease pandemic: data from a telephone survey of 254 patients. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2022;60(2):149-156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2022-149-156

Views: 501


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)