Global antiphospholipid syndrome score (GAPSS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2022-546-553
Abstract
Introduction. The Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) is a tool proposed to quantify the risk of clinical manifestations associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and certain cardiovascular risk factors.
Objective. To validate GAPSS in a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Russia.
Material and methods. 115 patients with SLE were included in the study, including 51 (44%) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), 14 (12%) – SLE with aPL, and 50 (44%) – SLE.
Results. There was a history of thrombosis in 58 (50%) patients with 115, of them 14 (24%) had arterial thrombosis, 29 (50%) – venous, 15 (26%) – combined. Pregnancy against the background of the disease occurred in 43 women included in the study. Of them, 29 (67%) had obstetric pathology. Patients with thrombosis and obstetric pathology had a GAPSS score of 7.17±5.64, versus 4.48±4.55 without these manifestations (p=0.0003). There was a significant association between GAPSS levels and thrombosis – patients with thrombosis had a GAPSS of 7.31±5.70, those without thrombosis – 4.00±4.81 (p=0.001). GAPPS values were higher in arterial thrombosis compared to venous thrombosis (10.40±25.30 versus 5.82±5.28; p=0.01). GAPSS levels ≥6 and ≥10 were analyzed to select GAPSS values at which a high risk of recurrent thrombosis and/or obstetric pathology could be indicated. All GAPSS levels had a significant association with clinical manifestations of APS. The quality of GAPSS by ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) for GAPSS of 0.697.
Conclusion. GAPSS can be used to assess the risk of recurrence or development of thrombosis and/or obstetric pathology in patients with SLE in the Russian Federation. The GAPSS ≥6 values should be used to stratify patients with SLE into high risk group for recurrence of vascular complications. Further prospective follow-up is needed to confirm the value of GAPSS.
About the Authors
F. A. CheldievaRussian Federation
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
T. M. Reshetnyak
Russian Federation
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
A. A. Shumilova
Russian Federation
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
K. S. Nurbaeva
Russian Federation
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
M. V. Cherkasova
Russian Federation
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
A. M. Lila
Russian Federation
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A; 125993, Moscow, Barrikadnaya str., 2/1, building 1
E. L. Nasonov
Russian Federation
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A; 119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8, building 2
References
1. Reshetnyak TM. Antiphospholipid syndrome: diagnosis and clinical manifestations (a lecture). Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologia = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2014;52(1):56–71 (In Russ.).
2. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2):295–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x
3. Radin M, Ugolini-Lopes MR, Sciascia S, Andrade D. Extra-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: Risk assessment and management. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48(1):117–120. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.12.006
4. Alarcon-Segovia D, Pe’rez-Ruiz A, Villa AR. Long-term prognosis of antiphospholipid syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Autoimmun. 2000;15(2):157–161. doi: 10.1006/ jaut.2000.0402
5. Amigo MC. Prognosis in antiphospholipid syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2001;27(3):661–669. doi: 10.1016/s0889- 857x(05)70227-1
6. Reshetnyak TM, Cheldieva FA. Classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome and its non-criterial manifestations. Tromboz, gemostaz i reologia. 2021;(4):4–12 (In Russ.).
7. Grika EP, Ziakas PD, Zintzaras E, Moutsopoulos HM, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG. Morbidity, mortality, and organ damage in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(3):516–523. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110800
8. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Egurbide MV, Ugalde J, Aguirre C. High impact of antiphospholipid syndrome on irreversible organ damage and survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(1):77–82. doi: 10.1001/ archinte.164.1.77
9. Sciascia S, Sanna G, Murru V, Roccatello D, Khamashta MA, Bertolaccini ML. GAPSS: The Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(8):1397–1403. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes388
10. Sciascia S, Cuadrado MJ, Sanna G, Murru V, Roccatello D, Khamashta MA, et al. Thrombotic risk assessment in systemic lupus erythematosus: Validation of the global antiphospholipid syndrome score in a prospective cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(12):1915–1920. doi: 10.1002/acr.22388
11. Sciascia S, Sanna G, Murru V, Roccatello D, Khamashta MA, Bertolaccini ML. The global anti-phospholipid syndrome score in primary APS. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54(1):134–138. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu307
12. Oku K, Amengual O, Bohgaki T, Horita T, Yasuda S, Atsumi T. An independent validation of the Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score in a Japanese cohort of patients with autoimmune diseases. Lupus. 2015;24(7):774–775. doi: 10.1177/0961203314561284
13. Zuo Y, Li C, Karp DR, Li Z. Clinical and epidemiological correlates of the adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score in a large cohort of chinese APS patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(Suppl 10):2183.
14. Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, et al. Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(8):2677–2686. doi: 10.1002/art.34473
15. Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Caron D, Chang CH. Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35(6):630–640. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350606
16. Gladman D, Ginzler E, Goldsmith C, Fortin P, Liang M, Urowitz M, et al. The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(3):363–369. doi: 10.1002/art.1780390303
17. Aleksandrova EN, Novikov AA, Reshetnyak TM, Klykvina NG, Reshetnyak DV, Nasonov EL. Antibodies to beta2-glycoprotein and antibodies to cardiolipin in antiphospholipid syndrome: Analysis of sensitivity and specificity. Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal). 2003;81(9): 25–31 (In Russ.).
18. Rebrova OYu. Statistical analysis of medical data. Application of the application package STATISTICA. Moscow:MediaSfera;2002 (In Russ.).
19. Morozov SP. Clinical trials of software based on intelligent technologies (radiation diagnostics). Preprint No. CDT-2019-1. Best Practices in Radiation and Instrumental Diagnostics. Moscow;2019;23 (In Russ.).
20. Radin M, Sciascia S, Erkan D, Pengo V, Tektonidou MG, Ugarte A, et al.; APS ACTION. The adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) and the risk of recurrent thrombosis: Results from the APS ACTION cohort. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;49(3):464–468. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.04.009
21. Fernandez Mosteirin N, Saez Comet L, Salvador Osuna C, Calvo Villas JM, Velilla Marco J. Independent validation of the adjusted GAPSS: Role of thrombotic risk assessment in the real-life setting. Lupus. 2017;26(12):1328–1332. doi: 10.1177/0961203317703493
22. Barinotti A, Radin M, Cecchi I, Foddai SG, Arbrile M, Rubini E, et al. Assessing the cardiovascular risk in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: QRISK and GAPSS scores headto-head. Int J Cardiol. 2022;363:185–189. doi: 10.1016/ j.ijcard.2022.06.040
23. Schreiber K, Radin M, Cecchi I, Rubini E, Roccatello D, Jacobsen S, et al. The global antiphospholipid syndrome score in women with systemic lupus erythematosus and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39(5):1071–1076. doi: 10.55563/ clinexprheumatol/c96ief
24. Del Barrio-Longarela S, Martínez-Taboada VM, Blanco-Olavarri P, Merino A, Riancho-Zarrabeitia L, Comins-Boo A, et al. Does adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS) predict the obstetric outcome in antiphospholipid antibody carriers? A single-center study. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022;63(2):297–310. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08915-9
25. Garcia L, Velloso MS, Martire MV, Savy F, Arizpe F, Garcia N, et al. Validation of the adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score in systemic lupus erythematosus patients in Argentina. Lupus. 2020;29(14):1866–1872. doi: 10.1177/0961203320960814
26. Tektonidou MG, Andreoli L, Limper M, Amoura Z, Cervera R, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome in adults. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(10):1296–1304. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215213
Review
For citations:
Cheldieva F.A., Reshetnyak T.M., Shumilova A.A., Nurbaeva K.S., Cherkasova M.V., Lila A.M., Nasonov E.L. Global antiphospholipid syndrome score (GAPSS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2022;60(5):546-553. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2022-546-553