Evaluation of the effectiveness of conservative treatment of patients with stage III osteoarthritis of the knee joint using functional unloading orthoses with the possibility of varus-valgus correction
https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2024-319-324
Abstract
The aim of the study – Is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of a functional unloading orthosis with the possibility of varus–valgus correction (FUOVVC) in patients with stage III osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
Materials and methods. The study involved 10 patients with stage III osteoarthritis of the knee joint who underwent outpatient treatment at the V.A. Nasonova Federal State Medical University of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. All patients used the FUOVVC for 3 months. To evaluate the results, pain intensity was determined using a visual analog scale (VAS) and knee joint function according to the knee injury and osteoarthritis KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) questionnaire before using the orthosis, after 1 and 3 months. Additionally, the assessment of VAS was carried out immediately after fixation of the orthosis on the knee joint.
Results. The median age of the patients was 63.5 [55.0; 74.0] years, body mass index – 29.9 [27.9; 34.0] kg/m2, pain according to VAS baseline – 40.0 [40.0; 60.0] mm, pain according to VAS 1 hour after the start of the use of The median age of the patients was 63.5 [55.0; 74.0] years, body mass index – 29.9 [27.9; 34.0] kg/m2, pain according to VAS baseline – 40.0 [40.0; 60.0] mm, pain according to VAS 1 hour after the start of the use of FUOVVC – 25.0 [10.0; 30.0] mm, pain according to VAS after 1 month – 10.0 [0.0; 20.0] mm, VAS after 3 months – 10.0 [0.0; 20.0] mm. The median score according to the KOOS questionnaire was initially 41.5 [38.0; 50.0], after 1 month – 61.0 [53.0; 63.0], after 3 months – 63.5 [58.0; 64.0]. None of the patients had any adverse events when wearing the FUOVVC. – 25.0 [10.0; 30.0] mm, pain according to VAS after 1 month – 10.0 [0.0; 20.0] mm, VAS after 3 months – 10.0 [0.0; 20.0] mm. The median score according to the KOOS questionnaire was initially 41.5 [38.0; 50.0], after 1 month – 61.0 [53.0; 63.0], after 3 months – 63.5 [58.0; 64.0]. None of the patients had any adverse events when wearing the FUOVVC.
About the Authors
M. A. MakarovRussian Federation
Maxim A. Makarov
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
V. A. Nesterenko
Russian Federation
Vadim A. Nesterenko
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
V. E. Bialik
Russian Federation
Valerii E. Bialik
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
E. G. Zotkin
Russian Federation
Evgeniy G. Zotkin
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
E. I. Bialik
Russian Federation
Evgeny I. Bialik
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
S. A. Makarov
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Makarov
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
A. E. Karateev
Russian Federation
Andrey E. Karateev
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
A. A. Bialik
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Bialik
115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A
References
1. Minnig MCC, Golightly YM, Nelson AE. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Literature update 2022–2023. Curr Opin Rheum. 2024;36(2):108-112. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000985
2. Fazli F, Farsi A, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Mansour Sohani S, Yousefi N, Azadinia F. Effect of knee orthosis and kinesio taping on clinical and neuromuscular outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized clinical trial. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(10):625-634. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.72208.3362
3. El Zahraa Wehbi F, Huo W, Amirat Y, Rafei ME, Khalil M, Mohammed S. Active impedance control of a knee-joint orthosis during swing phase. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017;2017:435- 440. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009286
4. Zhang B, Qian H, Wu H, Yang X. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2023;31(1):10225536231162829. doi: 10.1177/10225536231162829
5. Sukerkar PA, Doyle Z. Imaging of osteoarthritis of the knee. Radiol Clin North Am. 2022;60(4):605-616. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2022.03.004
6. Brophy RH, Fillingham YA. AAOS clinical practice guideline summary: Management of osteoarthritis of the knee (Nonarthroplasty), third edition. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022;30(9):721-729. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01233
7. Fesharaki SA, Farahmand F, Saeedi H, Raeissadat SA, Abdollahy E, Ahmadi A, et al. The effects of knee orthosis with two degrees of freedom joint design on gait and sit-to-stand task in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020;20(4):e324-e331. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.04.008
8. Cudejko T, van der Esch M, van den Noort JC, Rijnhart JJM, van der Leeden M, Roorda LD, et al. Decreased pain and improved dynamic knee instability mediate the beneficial effect of wearing a soft knee brace on activity limitations in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71(8):1036-1043. doi: 10.1002/acr.23722
9. Hall M, Starkey S, Hinman RS, Diamond LE, Lenton GK, Knox G, et al. Effect of a valgus brace on medial tibiofemoral joint contact force in knee osteoarthritis with varus malalignment: A within-participant cross-over randomised study with an uncontrolled observational longitudinal follow-up. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0257171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257171
10. Barati K, Kamyab M, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Parnianpour M, Hosseini N, Bidari S. Evaluating the effect of equipping an unloading knee orthosis with local muscle vibrators on clinical parameters, muscular activation level, and medial contact force in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized trial. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024;48(1):46-54. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000243
11. Pfeiffer SJ, Valentine JA, Goodwin JS, Nissman DB, Blackburn T, Pietrosimone B. Effects of a knee valgus unloader brace on medial femoral articular cartilage deformation following walking in varusaligned individuals. Knee. 2019;26(5):1067-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.06.014
12. Brand A, Klöpfer-Krämer I, Morgenstern M, Kröger I, Michel B, Thannheimer A, et al. Effects of knee orthosis adjustment on biomechanical performance and clinical outcome in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(6): 587-594. doi: 10.1177/0309364617691623
13. Konopka J, Finlay A, Eckstein F, Dragoo J. Effects of unloader bracing on clinical outcomes and articular cartilage regeneration following microfracture of isolated chondral defects: A randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(9):2889-2898. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06228-6
14. Robert-Lachaine X, Dessery Y, Belzile É, Turmel S, Corbeil P. Three-month efficacy of three knee braces in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis in a randomized crossover trial. J Orthop Res. 2020;38(10):2262-2271. doi: 10.1002/jor.24634
15. Hart H, Crossley K, Ackland D, Cowan S, Collins N. Effects of an unloader knee brace on knee-related symptoms and function in people with post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2016;23(1):85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.05.006
16. Petersen W, Ellermann A, Henning J, Nehrer S, Rembitzki IV, Fritz J, et al. Non-operative treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: A prospective randomized trial with two different braces-ankle-foot orthosis versus knee unloader brace. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(2):155-166. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3040-8
17. Beaudreuil J, Bendaya S, Faucher M, Coudeyre E, Ribinik P, Revel M, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for rest orthosis, knee sleeves, and unloading knee braces in knee osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2009;76(6):629-636. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.02.002
Review
For citations:
Makarov M.A., Nesterenko V.A., Bialik V.E., Zotkin E.G., Bialik E.I., Makarov S.A., Karateev A.E., Bialik A.A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of conservative treatment of patients with stage III osteoarthritis of the knee joint using functional unloading orthoses with the possibility of varus-valgus correction. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2024;62(3):319-324. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2024-319-324