Effectiveness and safety of TNF-α inhibitors and il-6 pathway antagonists for refractory Takayasu arteritis
https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2024-606-613
Abstract
Standard therapy for Takayasu arteritis (TA) usually comprises glucocorticoids in combination with cytotoxic agents. However, despite ongoing therapy disease activity remains high in some patients. In these cases, biological therapy is prescribed.
The aim – to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) pathway antagonists (anti-IL-6) therapy in TA patients refractory to conventional therapy.
Subjects and methods. In this single center retrospective cohort study, we included 36 female adult patients aged from 20 to 57 years (54 courses of biological therapy) with TA, diagnosed in accordance with the ACR classification criteria (1990 and/or 2022) and/or Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (2012) definition. All patients were on biologics due to resistance to corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents.
Results. A total of 54 courses of TNFi (n=29) and anti-IL-6 (n=25) inhibitors were analyzed. The median duration of biological therapy was 14 (9; 32) months, with a median duration of 14 (8; 32) months for TNFi and 13 (7; 32) months for anti-IL-6. The remission rate showed no significant difference between TNFi (79%) and anti-IL-6 (84%; p=0.736) treatment groups. The incidence of relapses was higher with TNFi, although the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (36% and 14%, respectively; p=0.291). Relapse was established after 15 (10; 22) weeks for TNFi and after 22 (13; 31) weeks for anti-IL-6 (p=0.919). TNFi and anti-IL-6 had a comparable steroid-sparing effect: the median dose of GC in terms of prednisolone decreased from 13 to 8 mg (p=0.009), and from 15 to 8 mg (p=0.026), respectively. Factors associated with achieving TA remission were assessed using a logistic regression model. None of the parameters (age at the start of biological therapy, duration of disease before the start of biological therapy, class of biological therapy) were associated with achieving remission of TA. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22% of cases resulting in therapy discontinuation in 13% of patients.
Conclusion. Our study demonstrated the high effectiveness of TNFi and anti-IL-6 in patients with refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapy TA: remission was achieved in 80% of cases, allowing for a reduction in glucocorticoid dosage. The safety profile of TNFi and antiIL-6 was acceptable. However, AEs occurred slightly more frequently in the TNFi group.
About the Authors
V. E. LoginaRussian Federation
Varvara E. Logina
119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8, building 2
N. M. Bulanov
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Bulanov
119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8, building 2
A. A. Efimova
Russian Federation
Anna A. Efimova
119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8, building 2
N. P. Vlasova
Russian Federation
Natalia P. Vlasova
117997, Moscow, Ostrovitianova str., 1
K. V. Makarova
Russian Federation
Kira V. Makarova
119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8, building 2
P. I. Novikov
Russian Federation
Pavel I. Novikov
119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8, building 2
S. V. Moiseev
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Moiseev
119991, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8, building 2
References
1. Boiardi L, Galli E, Macchioni P, Muratore F, Klinowski G, Hunder GG, et al. Takayasu arteritis and large-vessel giant cell arteritis in Italian population. Comprehensive analysis from a single institutional cohort of 184 cases. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2023;59:152173. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152173
2. Jennette JC. Overview of the 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2013;17(5):603-606. doi: 10.1007/s10157-013-0869-6
3. Mukhin NA, Smitienko IO, Novikov PI, Semenkova EN, Moiseev SV. Clinical manifestations and outcomes of Takayasu arteritis in the cohort study in 128 patients. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy. 2014;23(3):55-61 (In Russ.).
4. Maz M, Chung SA, Abril A, Langford CA, Gorelik M, Guyatt G, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(8):1349-1365. doi: 10.1002/art.41774
5. Comarmond C, Biard L, Lambert M, Mekinian A, Ferfar Y, Kahn JE, et al.; French Takayasu Network. Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of complications in Takayasu arteritis: A multicenter study of 318 patients. Circulation. 2017;136(12):1114-1122. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.027094
6. Hellmich B, Agueda A, Monti S, Buttgereit F, de Boysson H, Brouwer E, et al. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(1):19-30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672
7. Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, Hoffman GS. Takayasu arteritis: What is the long-term prognosis? Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33(4):777-786. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2007.07.014
8. Park MC, Lee SW, Park YB, Lee SK. Serum cytokine profiles and their correlations with disease activity in Takayasu’s arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(5):545-548. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei266
9. Schmidt J, Kermani TA, Bacani AK, Crowson CS, Matteson EL, Warrington KJ. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with Takayasu arteritis: Experience from a referral center with longterm followup. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(7):1079-1083. doi: 10.1002/acr.21636
10. Novikov PI, Smitienko IO, Sokolova MV, Moiseev SV. Certolizumab pegol in the treatment of Takayasu arteritis: The first experience and prospects. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologia = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2018;56(3):333-338 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2018-333-338
11. Nakaoka Y, Isobe M, Tanaka Y, Ishii T, Ooka S, Niiro H, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in refractory Takayasu arteritis: Final results of the randomized controlled phase 3 TAKT study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(9):2427-2434. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez630
12. Mekinian A, Comarmond C, Resche-Rigon M, Mirault T, Kahn JE, Lambert M, et al.; French Takayasu Network. Efficacy of biological-targeted treatments in Takayasu arteritis: Multicenter, retrospective study of 49 patients. Circulation. 2015;132(18):1693- 1700. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014321
13. Cañas CA, Cañas F, Izquierdo JH, Echeverri AF, Mejía M, Bonilla-Abadía F, et al. Efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin 6 receptor monoclonal antibody (tocilizumab) in Colombian patients with Takayasu arteritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2014;20(3):125-129. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000098
14. Harigai M, Miyamae T, Hashimoto H, Yoshida A, Yamashita K, Nakaoka Y. A multicentre, large-scale, observational study of tocilizumab in patients with Takayasu arteritis in Japan: The ACTEMRA® (ACT)-Bridge study. Mod Rheumatol. 2023;33(5):998-1006. doi: 10.1093/mr/roac099
15. Liao H, Du J, Li T, Pan L. Tocilizumab for faster and safer remission of Takayasu’s arteritis. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022;13:20406223221131715. doi: 10.1177/20406223221131715
16. Mekinian A, Biard L, Lorenzo D, Novikov PI, Salvarani C, Espitia O, et al.; French Takayasu network. Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: Multicentre retrospective study. RMD Open. 2023;9(2):e002830. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002830
17. Calderón-Goercke M, Castañeda S, Aldasoro V, Villa I, Moriano C, Romero-Yuste S, et al.; Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group. Tocilizumab in refractory giant cell arteritis. Monotherapy versus combined therapy with conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Observational multicenter study of 134 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021;51(2):387-394. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.01.006
18. Arend WP, Michel BA, Bloch DA, Hunder GG, Calabrese LH, Edworthy SM, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33(8):1129-1134. doi: 10.1002/art.1780330811
19. Grayson PC, Ponte C, Suppiah R, Robson JC, Gribbons KB, Judge A, et al.; DCVAS Study Group. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74(12):1872-1880. doi: 10.1002/art.42324
20. Kerr GS, Hallahan CW, Giordano J, Leavitt RY, Fauci AS, Rottem M, et al. Takayasu arteritis. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(11):919- 929. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00004
21. Misra DP, Singh K, Rathore U, Patro P, Tomelleri A, Campochiaro C, et al. The effectiveness of tocilizumab and its comparison with tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors for Takayasu Arteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2023;22(3):103275. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103275
22. Mekinian A, Biard L, Dagna L, Novikov P, Salvarani C, Espitia O, et al.; French Takayasu network. Efficacy and safety of TNF-α antagonists and tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: Multicentre retrospective study of 209 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022;61(4):1376-1384. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab635
23. Alibaz-Oner F, Kaymaz-Tahra S, Bayındır Ö, Yazici A, Ince B, Kalkan K, et al. Biologic treatments in Takayasu’s arteritis: A comparative study of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and tocilizumab. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021;51(6):1224-1229. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.09.010
24. Beketova TV, Nasonov EL. Innovative treatments for Takayasu’s arteritis: A focus on interleukin-6 inhibitors. The authors’ experience with tocilizumab and a review of literature. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologia = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(5):536-548 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-536-548
25. Koilubaeva GM, Sarybaev ASh, Bolotbekova AM, Dubinina TV, Nasonov EL, Dzhuzenova FS, et al. Persistent effect of tocilizumab in refractory Takayasu’s arteritis (clinical observation). Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologia = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2022;60(2): 242-248 (In Russ.). doi: 10.47360/1995-4484-2022-242-248
26. Kolloy ES, Langford CA, Clark TM, Gota CE, Hoffman GS. Anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis: Long-term follow-up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(11):1567-1569. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.093260
27. Prieto-Peña D, Bernabeu P, Vela P, Narváez J, FernándezLópez JC, Freire-González M, et al. Tocilizumab in refractory Caucasian Takayasu’s arteritis: A multicenter study of 54 patients and literature review. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021;13:1759720X211020917
28. Сlifford A, Hoffman GS. Recent advances in the medical management of Takayasu arteritis: An update on use of biologic therapies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014;26(1):7-15. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000004 29. Decker P, Olivier P, Risse J, Zuily S, Wahl D. Tocilizumab and refractory Takayasu disease: Four case reports and systematic review. Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17(4):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.11.026
29. Kang L, Liu Y, Luo Z, Zhou Y, Chen B, Yin G, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature on tocilizumab in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1084558. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1084558
30. Comarmond C, Plaisier E, Dahan K, Mirault T, Emmerich J, Amoura Z, et al. Anti TNF-α in refractory Takayasu’s arteritis: Cases series and review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11(9):678-684. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.025
Review
For citations:
Logina V.E., Bulanov N.M., Efimova A.A., Vlasova N.P., Makarova K.V., Novikov P.I., Moiseev S.V. Effectiveness and safety of TNF-α inhibitors and il-6 pathway antagonists for refractory Takayasu arteritis. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2024;62(6):606-613. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2024-606-613