Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

Clinical significance of the determination of antibodies to the NR2 subunit of glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (aNMDAR) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome

https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2025-168-175

Abstract

The aim to determine the clinical significance of hyperproduction of antibodies to the NR2 subunit of glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (aNMDAR) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Material and methods. The study included 66 patients with reliable diagnoses of SLE and APS (SLE – 24 patients; SLE+APS – 18 patients, primary APS – 24 patients). Young women (35.5±10.2 years) prevailed (72.7%). All patients were examined according to the standards recommended by the Association of Rheumatologists of Russia, and also examined by a psychiatrist. Neuropsychiatric syndromes, mainly psychiatric, were detected in 62 (93.9%) patients. aNMDAR was determined in all patients and 20 healthy donors, matched by gender and age, by enzyme immunoassay in blood serum.

Results. The concentration of aNMDAR in patients with neurological manifestations of SLE and APS did not exceed the threshold value, but was significantly higher than in healthy donors (4.32±2.0 versus 2.96±1.44 ng/ml, respectively; p=0.042). Patients with elevated aNMDAR concentrations had a statistically significantly higher (p<0.05) probability of detecting neurological manifestations such as acute/transient cerebrovascular accident/epilepsy (odds ratio (OR) – 9.0), as well as bipolar affective disorder (OR=14.0), and statistically not significantly – schizotypal disorder (OR=3.8) and moderate cognitive impairment (organic type) (OR=2.15). The probability of detecting APS in patients with elevated aNMDAR values was 1.7 times higher, the risk of thrombosis according to the GAPSS (Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score) was 4.28 times higher, and aPL positivity (aCL, aß2GP-1, aFs/Pt) and a-ds-DNA – 2.5–6.73 times (the differences were not statistically significant).

Conclusion. aNMDAR may play an important role in the development of certain neuropsychiatric manifestations in patients with SLE and APS. It is advisable to conduct larger-scale studies aimed at confirming the need to identify aNMDAR as a biomarker for the diagnosis and monitoring of the progression of neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE and APS.

About the Authors

T. A. Lisitsyna
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Tatiana A. Lisitsyna

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



A. B. Borisova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Anastasia B. Borisova

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



T. M. Reshetnyak
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Tatiana M. Reshetnyak

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



D. Yu. Veltishchev
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Dmitry Yu. Veltishchev

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A,

117997, Moscow, Ostrovitianova str., 1



M. E. Diatroptov
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Mikhail E. Diatroptov

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



A. S. Avdeeva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Anastasia S. Avdeeva

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



K. S. Nurbaeva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Kamila S. Nurbaeva

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



A. A. Abramkin
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Anton A. Abramkin

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



E. L. Nasonov
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Evgeny L. Nasonov

115522, Moscow, Kashirskoye Highway, 34A



References

1. Shaban A, Leira EC. Neurological complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019;19(12):97. doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-1012-1

2. Hanly JG, Inanç M. The neurology of lupus. J Neurol Sci. 2021;424:117419. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117419

3. Borisova AB, Lisitsyna TA, Veltishchev DY, Reshetnyak TM. Mental disorders in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Association with activity and the course of rheumatic disease. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2023;95(5):392-397 (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/00403660.2023.05.202208

4. Nasonov EL (ed.). Rheumatology. Russian clinical recommendations. Moscow:GEOTAR-Media;2017 (In Russ.).

5. Reshetnyak TM, Cheldieva FA, Nurbayeva KS, Lila AM, Nasonov EL. Antiphospholipid syndrome: Diagnosis, development, therapy. Thrombosis, Hemostasis and Rheology. 2020;(4):4-21 (In Russ). doi: 10.25555/THR.2020

6. Cervera R, Piette JC, Font J, Khamashta MA, Shoenfeld Y, Camps MT, et al.; Euro-Phospholipid Project Group. Antiphospholipid syndrome: Clinical and immunologic manifestations and patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(4):1019-1027. doi: 10.1002/art.10187

7. Sciascia S, Amigo MC, Roccatello D, Khamashta M. Diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome: ‘Extra-criteria’ manifestations and technical advances. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(9):548-560. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.124

8. Borisova АВ, Lisitsyna ТА, Veltishchev DYu, Reshetnyak ТМ, Seravina ОF, Kovalevskaya ОВ, et al. Mental disorders in antiphospholipid syndrome patients: Association with clinical and immunological manifestations of the disease. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologia = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2024;62(2):176-185 (In Russ.). doi: 10.47360/1995-4484-2024-176-185

9. Deijns SJ, Broen JCA, Kruyt ND, Schubart CD, Andreoli L, Tincani A, et al. The immunologic etiology of psychiatric manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus: A narrative review on the role of the blood brain barrier, antibodies, cytokines and chemokines. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(8):102592. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102592

10. Sato S, Temmoku J, Fujita Y, Yashiro-Furuya M, Matsuoka N, Asano T, et al. Autoantibodies associated with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: The quest for symptom-specific biomarkers. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2020;66(1):1-9. doi: 10.5387/fms.2020-02

11. Tay SH, Fairhurst AM, Mak A. Clinical utility of circulating antiN-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits NR2A/B antibody for the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren’s syndrome: An updated meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(2):114-122. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.12.002

12. Omdal R, Brokstad K, Waterloo K, Koldingsnes W, Jonsson R, Mellgren SI. Neuropsychiatric disturbances in SLE are associated with antibodies against NMDA receptors. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12(5):392-398. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00976.x

13. Topuzova MP, Alekseeva T.M., Panina EB, Vavilova TV, Pospelova ML, Ivanova NE. NR2 antibodies as diagnostic and prognostic stroke biomarker. Arterial Hypertension. 2020;26(1):27-36 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-1-27-36

14. Gerosa M, Poletti B, Pregnolato F, Castellino G, Lafronza A, Silani V, et al. Antiglutamate receptor antibodies and cognitive impairment in primary antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Immunol. 2016;7:5. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00005

15. Yang Y, Yuan C, Shen SQ, Wang XE, Mei QH, Jiang WQ, et al. Autoantibodies to NR2A peptide of the glutamate/NMDA receptor in patients with seizure disorders in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:5047898. doi: 10.1155/2017/5047898

16. Pearlman DM, Najjar S. Meta-analysis of the association between N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antibodies and schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Schizophr Res. 2014;157(1-3):249-258. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.05.001

17. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(9):1725. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400928

18. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2):295-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x

19. Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Caron D, Chang CH. Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35(6):630-640. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350606

20. Gladman D, Ginzler E, Goldsmith C, Fortin P, Liang M, Urowitz M, et al. The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(3):363-369. doi: 10.1002/art.1780390303

21. Sciascia S, Sanna G, Murru V, Roccatello D, Khamashta MA, Bertolaccini ML. GAPSS: The Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(8):1397-1403. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes388

22. Cheldieva FA, Reshetnyak TM, Shumilova AA, Nurbaeva KS, Cherkasova MV, Samarkina EY, et al. Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2023;17(1):31-37 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2023-1-31-37

23. Kakorina EP, Maksimova MV, Mishnev OD. The use of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Problems Related to Health, the tenth revision (ICD-10) in the practice of domestic medicine. Moscow;2012 (In Russ.).

24. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition; 2013.

25. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1983;67:361-370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x

26. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382-389. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382

27. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50-55. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x

28. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695-699. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x

29. Carrión-Barberà I, Salman-Monte TC, Vílchez-Oya F, Monfort J. Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: A review. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20(4):102780. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102780

30. Ricarte IF, Dutra LA, Abrantes FF, Toso FF, Barsottini OGP, Silva GS, et al. Neurologic manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus. 2018;27(9):1404-1414. doi: 10.1177/0961203318776110

31. Hirohata S, Arinuma Y, Yanagida T, Yoshio T. Blood-brain barrier damages and intrathecal synthesis of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor NR2 antibodies in diffuse psychiatric/neuropsychological syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(2):R77. doi: 10.1186/ar4518

32. Lauvsnes MB, Omdal R. Systemic lupus erythematosus, the brain, and anti-NR2 antibodies. J Neurol. 2012;259(4):622-629. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6232-5

33. Arinuma Y. Antibodies and the brain: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody and the clinical effects in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31(3):294-299. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000554


Review

For citations:


Lisitsyna T.A., Borisova A.B., Reshetnyak T.M., Veltishchev D.Yu., Diatroptov M.E., Avdeeva A.S., Nurbaeva K.S., Abramkin A.A., Nasonov E.L. Clinical significance of the determination of antibodies to the NR2 subunit of glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (aNMDAR) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2025;63(2):168-175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2025-168-175

Views: 124


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)