Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

Influence of disease activity and treatment on rate of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2008-409

Abstract

Severity of hands and feet joint destruction is the most objective marker of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) progression determining functional disability. The main aim of RA treatment is suppression of joint destruction. Objective. To study dependence of joint erosions forming speed on disease modifying anti-rhcumatic drugs (DMARD) administration and RA activity. Material and methods. Retrospective analysis of 451 cases of RA treatment was performed. Erosions were counted according to modified Sharp method. Erosions forming speed was counted as ratio of erosion number increase to a year’s time space. Averaged disease activity was calculated as arithmetic mean for all DAS28 values obtained during disease course. Considering close relationship between disease activity and DMARD administration two-factor analysis was used. DMARD administration (>3 months) and mean activity of RA were considered as factors. Results. Variance analysis (ANOVA) with covariant showed that mean RA activity is a significant factor influencing erosions forming speed (F=12,5; p=4xl0 4). Character of DMARD, fact of its administration and disease duration did not significantly influence erosions forming speed considering disease activity covariant. Regression model with inclusion disease duration factor mean disease activity and DMARD administration at the moment of assessment allowed to explain 42% of dispersion (determination coefficient). Conclusion. Activity of RA is the main factor influencing erosions forming speed. Therapy not decreasing activity of RA does not change erosions forming speed

References

1. <div><p>Чичасова Н. В. Ревматоидный артрит: клиниколабораторные и клинико-морфологические сопоставления,прогноз. Дисс. дмн., М..2004.</p><p>Welsing P.M.J. Gestelam V, Swinkels H.L. Kiemeney L. et al. The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthr. Rheum., 2001, 44, 2009-2017</p><p>Welsing P.M.J., Landewe R.B., Van Riel P.L. et al. The relationship between disease activity and radiologic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal analisis. Arthr. Rheum., 2004, 50, 2082-2093</p><p>Wolfe F., Cush J.J., O'Dell J.R. et al. Consensus recommendations for the assessment and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol., 2001, 28, 14-30</p><p>Крелъ A.A., Болотин E.B., Каневская М.З. и др. Объективизация проявлений ревматоидного артрита, характеризующих его эволюцию. Вопр. ревматизма, 1981, 3, 11-15</p><p>Тодоров И. Клиническое лабораторные исследования в педиатрии ТИЗ «МИФ», София, 1963</p><p>Fransen J., van Riel P.L.C.M. The disease activity score and the EULAR response criteria. Clin. Exp. Rheum., 2005, 23, 5, suppl. 39, s093-s099</p><p>Aletaha D., Nell V.PK, Stamm T. et al. Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of clinical activity score. Arthr. Res. Ther., 2005, 7, 796-806</p><p>Haulsmans HMJ, Jacobs JWG, van der Heijede DMFM. et al. The course of radiologic damage during the first six years of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthr. Rheum., 2000, 43, 1927-1940</p><p>Wolfe F., Sharp J. T. Radiographic outcome of recentonset rheumatoid arthritis: a 19-year study of radiographic progression. Arthr. Rheum., 1998, 41,1571-1582</p><p>Scott D.L. Prognostic factors in early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology, 2000, 39(suppl. 1),24-29</p><p>Lindqvist E., Jonsson K., Saxne Т., Eberhardt K. Course of radiographic damage омег 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arm. Rheum. Dis., 2003. 62, 611-616</p><p>Fuchs H.A., Pincus T. Radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis: description by nonlinear models. J. Rheumatol., 1992, 19,1655-1658</p><p>Finlch A. , Choi H.K., Wolfe F. Progression of radiographic joint damage in different eras: trends towards milder disease in rheumatoid arthritis are attributable to improved treatment. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 2006, 65, 1192-1197</p><p>Sharp J.T. Radiographic evaluation of the course of articular disease. Clin. Rheum. Dis., 1983, 9, 541557</p><p>Fuchs H.A., Pincus T. Radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis: description by nonlinear models. J. Rheumatol., 1992, 19,1655-8</p><p>Plant M.J., Jones P. IV., Saklatvala J. et al. Patterns of radiological progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: results of an 8-year prospective study. J. Rheumatol., 1998, 25, 417-426</p><p>Van Gestel A.M., Anderson J.J., van Riel P.L. et al. ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials. J. Rheumatol., 1999, 26, 705-711</p><p>Ideguchi H., Ohno S., Hattori H. et al. Bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis can be repaired trough reduction in disease activity with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthr. Res. Ther., 2006, 8, 76-86</p><p>Breedveld F.C., Weisman M.H., Kavanaugh A.F. et al. The PREMIER Study. Arthr. Rheum., 2006, 54, I, 26-37</p></div><br />


Review

For citations:


Goryachev D.V., Krichevskaya O.A., Zornyak A.P., Chichasova N.V., Erdes Sh.F. Influence of disease activity and treatment on rate of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2008;46(5):10-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2008-409

Views: 886


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)