Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2010-829

Abstract

Clinicoeconomic studies require that the health utility index be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Choice of an adequate method for determining health utility for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) makes it necessary to compare various approaches to this assessment.
Objective. To compare health utility values obtained with a time to trade-off (TTO) method and those with the EQ-5D questionnaire. Subjects and methods. A single interview was made in 45 patients with RA (mean RA duration 11.7±6.6 years) with a mean HAQ of 1.22±0.52. Utility was assessed using the direct TTO method, EQ-5D index, and visual analogue scale of general health (VAS-GH); functional disease activity index was assessed according to the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ).
Results. Five (11.2%) patients with RA could not answer a question to calculate TTO. The mean TTO, EQ-5D, and VAS-GH "thermometer" indices were 0.55±0.36, 0.30±0.32, and 0.47±0.23, respectively. Conversion from EQ-5D to utility index yielded the values similar to those with a mean TTO of 0.54±0.29.
The values of the utility index calculated by TTO failed to correlate with those of HAQ and EQ-5D. The disease duration was unrelated to the values of the utility index calculated by any of the methods used. The association of TTO index was found only for VAS-GH "thermometer". Conclusion. EQ-5D index and VAS-GH are the methods of choice in determining health utility for a clinicoeconomic analysis in patients with RA.

References

1. <div><p>Torrance G. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986; 5: 1-30.</p><p>Mark D.B., Simons Т.А. Fundamentals of economic analysis. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 38-40.</p><p>Investigating Health and Health Services - Research Methods in Health. Buckingham - Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1997; 79-98.</p><p>Marra C.A., Marion S.A., Guh D.P. et al. Not all «quality-adjusted life years» are equal. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 616-24.</p><p>Barton G.R., Sach T.H., Jenkinson C. et al. Do estimates of cost-utility based on the EQ-5D differ from those based on the mapping of utility scores? Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 51-62.</p><p>Ariza-Ariza R., Hernandez-Cruz B., Carmona L. et al. Assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between time trade-off and the EuroQol. Arthr Rheum 2006; 55: 751-6.</p><p>Tijhuis G., Jansen S., Stiggelbout A. et al. Value of the time trade off method for measuring utilities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2000; 59: 892-7.</p><p>Stiggelbout A.M., Kiebert G.M., Kievit J. et al. The «utility» of the Time Trade-Off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional Trade-Off. Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 1207-14.</p><p>Scott D., Koshaba B., Choy E. Limited correlation between the RAQ and EuroQol in rheumatoid arthritis: questionalble validity of deriving quality adjusted life years from HAQ. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 1534-7.</p><p>Witney A.G., Treharne G., Tavakoli M. et al. The relationship of medical, demographic and psychosocial factors to direct and indirect health utility instruments in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2006; 45: 975-81.</p><p>Revicki D., Kaplan R. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 477-87.</p></div><br />


Review

For citations:


Goryachev D.V., Erdes Sh.F., Goryachev D.V., Erdes Sh.F. The time to trade-off method versus the EQ-5D index to determine health utility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2010;48(6):86-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2010-829

Views: 747


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)