Profile of autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis

Objective: to estimate frequency of autoantibodies in a cohort of Russian patients with systemic sclerosis (SS) and to investigate clinical associations of these autoantibodies.

Subjects and methods. In 2012 to 2015, the investigation enrolled 300 patients (58 men and 242 women) who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) SS criteria. All patients underwent immunological examination including determination of antinuclear antibodies, anti-topoisomerase I (anti-Scl-70) antibodies, anti-centromere antibodies (ACA), anti-U1-ribonucleoprotein antibodies (anti-U1 RNP), and anti-RNP III antibodies.

Results and discussion. The vast majority of patients were middle-aged females with moderate disease duration. There was a preponderance of patients with limited cutaneous form (55.3%); 37.4% patients had diffuse SS; 5.9% had overlap syndrome; and <1% had visceral and juvenile SS. The vast majority (83.8%) of patients were found to have antinuclear factor. Among the SS-associated antibodies, anti-Scl-70 were most common and were revealed in approximately one-half of the patients. ACA was present in only 44 (14.6%) patients. There was a combination of positivity for ACA and anti-Scl-70 antibodies in 3 patients with limited cutaneous SS, including one with an early form of the disease. 26 patients had anti-U1 RNP antibodies. Among them, there was a preponderance of patients with limited cutaneous SS and overlap syndrome. Anti-RNP III antibodies were found in 5.5% of cases, mainly in those with limited cutaneous SS; these were observed in one patient with diffuse SS and interstitial lung disease. No kidney injury was seen in this patient group.

Conclusion. The characteristics of the Russian cohort are the preponderance of the limited cutaneous SS and the frequent detection of anti-Scl-70 antibodies in both diffuse and limited cutaneous SS; no correlation of anti-Scl-70 antibodies with rapid progression of the pathological process, with kidney disease.

1. Ананьева ЛП, Александрова ЕН. Аутоантитела при системной склеродермии: спектр, клинические ассоциации и прогностическое значение. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2016;54(1):86-99 [Ananyeva LP, Aleksandrova EN. Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis: spectrum, clinical associations, and prognostic value. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54(1):86-99 (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2016-86-99

2. Kuwana М, Gabrielli A. Autoantibodies, autoimmunity. In: Hachulla E, Czirjak L, editors. EULAR Textbook on systemic sclerosis. London: BMJ; 2013. P. 88-96.

3. Mayes MD, Reveille JD. In: Clements PJ, Furst DE, editors. Systemic sclerosis. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Williams; 2004. P. 1-17.

4. Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rhеumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Rhеum. 1980;23(5):581-90.

5. Jordan S, Maurer B, Distler O. Performance of the new EULAR /ACR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis in clinical practice. Ann Rhеum Dis. 2013;72 Suppl 3:60.

6. Hamaguchi Y. Autoantibodies and their clinical characteristics in systemic sclerosis. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi. 2013;36(3):139-47. doi: 10.2177/jsci.36.139

7. Mehra S, Walker J, Patterson K, Fritzler MJ. Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12:340-54. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2012.05.011

8. Mierau R, Genth E. [Scleroderma associated autoantibodies - clinical and diagnostic relevance]. Z Rheumatol. 2006 Jul;65(4):279-84 (In Germ.). doi: 10.1007/s00393-006-0067-y

9. Hamaguchi Y. Autoantibody profiles in systemic sclerosis: predictive value for clinical evaluation and prognosis. J Dermatol. 2010 Jan;37(1):42-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00762.x

10. Gallucio F, Walker U, Nihtyaova S, et al. Registries in systemic sclerosis: a worldwide experience. Rheumatology. 2011;50:60-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq355

11. Andrade LEC, Bortoluzzo AB, Bica BEG, et al. Immunological profile in systemic sclerosis: analysis of 1139 brazilian patients. Ann Rhem Dis. 2007;66 Suppl 11:198.

12. Wang J, Assassi S, Guo G, et al. Clinical and serological features of systemic sclerosis in a Chinese cohort. Autoimmun Rev. 2013 Jan;12(3):340-54. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

13. Morozzi G, Bellisai F, Fineschi I, et al. Prevalence of anti-histone antibodies, their clinical significance and correlation with other autoantibodies in a cohort of Italian scleroderma patients. Auto Immun Highlights. 2011 Mar 23;2(1):29-33. doi: 10.1007/s13317- 011-0015-y. eCollection 2011.

14. Radic M, Martinovic Kaliterna D, Ljutic D, et al. The level of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies correlates with the severity of metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal jonts flexion contractures in patients with systemic sclerosis. Ann Rhem Dis. 2007;66 Suppl 11:221.

15. Respico GR, Malhotra A, et al. Autoantibodies as risk factors for malignancy in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rhem Dis. 2007;66 Suppl 11:222.

16. Boin А, Rosen A. Autoimmunity in systemic sclerosis: current concepts. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007;9:165-72. doi: 10.1007/s11926-007-0012-3

17. Walker UA, Tyndall A, Czirjak L, et al., EUSTAR Co-authors. Clinical risk assessment of organ manifestations in systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials And Research (EUSTAR) group database. Ann Rheum Dis. Epub 2007 Feb 1. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.062901

18. Hamaguchi Y. Autoantibody profiles in systemic sclerosis: Predictive value for clinical evaluation and prognosis. J Dermatol. 2010;37:42-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1346- 8138.2009.00762.x

19. Satoh T, Ishikawa O, Ihn H, et al. Clinical usefulness of anti-RNA polymerase III antibody measurement by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Rheumatology (Oxf). 2009;48(23):1570-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep290