ASSESSMENT OF COXITIS PROGRESSION IN EARLY AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS
https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2020-160-164
Abstract
Recently, various visualization techniques have been used to study spondyloarthritis (SpA); indices are also being elaborated to assess the progression of radiographic changes in the spine and sacroiliac joints. Most studies dedicated to the problem of coxitis in SpA have shown that its progression parallels with a spinal inflammatory process; however, no indices for assessing the time course of changes in the hip joints (HJs) have been developed.
Objective: to develop a method for assessing the radiographic progression of coxitis in early axial SpA (axSpA).
Subjects and methods. Examinations were made in 175 patients (mean age, 28±6 years) with axSpA who met the 2009 ASAS criteria and had an inflammatory back pain duration of no more than 5 years. The analysis included 62 patients who had been followed up for at least 2 years and had plain pelvic bone X-ray films at the inclusion in the cohort and at 2 years after starting the follow-up. The sum of stages of radiographic coxitis (ssrC) was used to assess HJ injury progression. During the study, a formula was developed to assess the progression rate of radiographic coxitis.
Results and discussion. The median difference in ssrC (ΔssrC) was 0.78 [0; 4] at baseline and at 2 years. During the study period, 63% of the patients showed no progression of ssrC; the latter increased by 1 score in 7 (11%) patients, by 2 scores in 11 (18%), by 3 scores in 1 (2%), and by 4 scores in 4 (6%). The ssrC averaged 0.54±0.79 at baseline and increased by 0.78 up to 1.32±1.34 (p=0.06) at 2 years. At baseline, the coxitis progression rate averaged 0.45 per year (it was conventionally accepted that the patients exhibited no signs of HJ injury at onset of the disease: ssrC was zero); that was 0.54 and 0.1 per year at 1 and 2 years of follow-up, respectively.
Conclusion. The proposed calculation procedure is easily feasible and applicable in real practice, does not lead to additional investigations, and is economically feasible. This procedure allows monitoring the rate of radiographic coxitis progression in patients with axSpA throughout the course of the disease.
About the Authors
E. M. AgafonovaRussian Federation
34A, Kashirskoye Shosse, Moscow 115522
Sh. Erdes
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoye Shosse, Moscow 115522
T. V. Dubinina
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoye Shosse, Moscow 115522
D. G. Rumyantseva
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoye Shosse, Moscow 115522
A. V. Smirnov
Russian Federation
34A, Kashirskoye Shosse, Moscow 115522
References
1. Agafonova EM, Dubinina TV, Erdes ShF. Diagnosis and treatment of coxitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. NauchnoPrakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2018;56(4):500-5. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2018-500-505 (In Russ.)
2. Volnukhin EV, Galushko EA, Bochkova AG, et al. Clinical diversity of ankylosing spondylitis in the real practice of a rheumatologist in Russia (Part 1). Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practiсе. 2012;50(2):44-9. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2012-1272 (In Russ.)
3. Gaidukova IZ, Rebrov AP, Lapshina SA, et al. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and biological agents for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritides. Recommendations of the Spondyloarthritis Study Group of Experts, All-Russian Public Organization «The Association of Rheumatology of Russia». Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(5):474-84. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-474-484 (In Russ.)
4. Dwosh IL, Resnick D, Becker MA. Hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 1976;19:683-92. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(197607/08)19:4<683::AID-ART1780190405>3.0.CO;2-8
5. Kalin A, Elswood J. The outcome of 138 total hip replacement and 12 revisions in ankylosing spondylitis: high success rate after a mean followup of 7.5 years. J Rheumatol. 1989;16:955-8.
6. Bochkova AG, Rumyantseva OA, Severinova M, et al. Coxitis in patients with ankylosing spondyli- tis: clinicoradio logic comparisons. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practiсе. 2005;(4):8-13. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2005-610 (In Russ.)
7. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, et al. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286-91.
8. Rumyantseva DG, Dubinina TV, Demina AB, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis and non- radiological axial spondylitis: two stages of one disease? Terapevticheskiy Arkhiv. 2017;89(5):33-7 (In Russ.)
9. Agafonova EM, Dubinina TV, Demina AB, et al. Instrumental diagnosis of coxitis in ankylosing spondylitis in real clinical practice. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2018;56(6):716-21. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2018-716-721 (In Russ.)
10. Agafonova EM, Dubinina TV, Rumyantseva DG, et al. Coxitis in early axial spondyloarthritis. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2019;13(4):41-7. doi: 10/14412/1996-7012-2019-4-41-47 (In Russ.)
11. Erdes Sh, Dubinina TV, Agafonova EM, et al. Time course of changes in the clinical and instrumental manifestations of coxitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis during golimumab therapy: a GO-COX study. Preliminary results. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2019;57(3):307-11. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2019-307-311 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Agafonova E.M., Erdes Sh., Dubinina T.V., Rumyantseva D.G., Smirnov A.V. ASSESSMENT OF COXITIS PROGRESSION IN EARLY AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020;58(2):160-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2020-160-164