Preview

Rheumatology Science and Practice

Advanced search

ASSESSMENT OF THE SENSITIVITY OF NEW CRITERIA FOR SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS IN RUSSIAN PATIENT POPULATION

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2015-361-366

Abstract

Systemic sclerosis (SS) is a progressive connective tissue disease, the prognosis of which largely depends on the time of adequate therapy initiation. Low sensitivity of the 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SS classification criteria for identifying patients with early stage of the disease, and with its limited form in particular, has necessitated revision of existing SS diagnostic standards and elaboration of more sensitive criteria that allow to establish the diagnosis when the first sign of the disease appear.

Objective: to compare the sensitivity of the novel SS criteria of ACR and European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2013 and the 1980 ACR criteria in different stages of the disease.

Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 302 patients who had been diagnosed by experts as having SS and followed up at the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology in 2007–2013. The patients’ mean age was 49±13 years (18 to 80 years); male to female ratio – 1:9 (31 and 271), that of patients with diffuse and limited SS – 1:2 (105 and 197); mean duration of the disease from the first non-Raynaud’s syndrome was 8.2±7.0 years (6 months to 36 years). Physical examination, nailfold capillaroscopy, chest radiography or computed tomography, echocardiography for the determination of pulmonary artery systolic pressure and SS-specific antibodies evaluation were performed.

Results. 273 (90%) patients fulfilled the novel ACR/EULAR 2013 SS criteria. 76 (25%) patients had skin thickening above the metacarpophalangeal (MPC) joints in both hands; 263 (87%) – finger skin thickening [70 (23%) – finger swelling, 192 (64%) – thickening of all fingers distal to the MPC joints], 141 (47%) – digital ischemia [79 (26%) – digital pitting scars, 20 (7%) – digital ulcers, 42 (14%) – digital pitting scars and ulcers], 134 (44%) – telangiectasias, 276 (91%) – capillaroscopic changes, 225 (78%) – pulmonary hypertension (PH) or interstitial lung disease (ILD) [15 (5%) – PH 185 (61%) – ILD, 35 (12%) – ILD and PH], 301 (99%) – Raynaud’s phenomenon, and 185 (61%) – SS autoantibodies [138 (46%) – anti-Scl-70 antibodies (a-Scl-70), 42 (14%) – anti-centromere antibodies (ACA), 5 (1.7%) – ACA and a-Scl-70]. 216 (72%) patients fulfilled 1980 ACR SS criteria, and all of them met the novel criteria. With the latter, SS could be additionally diagnosed in 57 more (18%) patients.

Conclusion. The 2013 ACR/EULAR SS classification criteria have much higher sensitivity than the 1980 ACR criteria. The sensitivity of the novel criteria remained at the level of 90% in all, including the earliest, stages of the disease while the ACR criteria allowed to confirm diagnosis of SS in only half of patients with a disease duration of less than 1 year.

About the Authors

O. A. Koneva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia 34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian Federation


O. B. Ovsyannikova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia 34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian Federation


M. N. Starovoitova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia 34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian Federation


E. O. Cheremukhina
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia 34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian Federation


E. N. Aleksandrova
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia 34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian Federation


L. P. Ananyeva
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia 34A, Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian Federation


References

1. Гусева НГ. Системная склеродермия. Москва: Медицина; 1993. C. 7 [Guseva NG. Sistemnaya sklerodermiya [Systemic scleroderma]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1993. P. 7].

2. Wollheim FA. Classification of systemic sclerosis: visions and reality. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:1212–6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh671

3. Гусева НГ. Системная склеродермия. Москва: Медицина; 1993. C. 41–132 [Guseva NG. Sistemnaya sklerodermiya [Systemic scleroderma]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1993. P. 41–132].

4. Leroy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, et al. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol. 1988 Feb;15(2):202–5.

5. Subcommittee for Scleroderma Criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic clerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum. 1980 May;23(5):581–90. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230510

6. Leroy EC, Medsger TA. Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2001 Jul;28(7):1573–6.

7. Koening M, Joyal F, Fritzler MJ, et al. Autoantibodies and microvascular damage are independent predictive factors for the progression of Raynaud’s phenomenon to systemic sclerosis: a twenty-year prospective study of 586 patients, with validation of proposed criteria for early systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Dec;58(12):3902–12. doi: 10.1002/art.24038

8. Fransen J, Johnson SR, van den Hoogen F. Items for developing revised classification criteria in systemic sclerosis: results of a consensus exercise. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Mar;64(3):351–7. doi: 10.1002/acr.20679

9. Van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. 2013 Classification Criteria For Systemic Sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Nov;72(11):1747–55. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204424

10. Carreira P, Carmona L, Joven B. Performance of the old 1980 ACR and the new ACR-EULAR systemic sclerosis (SSC) classification criteria in patients with limited cutaneous SSC. 3rd Systemic Sclerosis World Congress. Abstract book. 2014. P. 8.

11. Matucci-Cerinic M, Allanore Y, Czirjak L, et al. The challenge of early systemic sclerosis for the EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research group (EUSTAR) community. It is time to cut the Gordian knot and develop a prevention or rescue strategy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1377–80. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.106302

12. Minier T, Guiducci S, Bellando-Randone S, et al. Preliminary analysis of the Very Early Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis (VEDOSS) EUSTAR multicentre study: evidence for puffy fingers as a pivotal sign for suspicion of systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug 12. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203716 [Epub ahead of print].

13. Alhajeri H, Hudson M, Fritzler M, et al. The 2013 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis Out-perform the 1980 Criteria. Data from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Sep 18. doi: 10.1002/acr.22451 [Epub ahead of print].

14. Jordan S, Maurer B, Toniolo M, et al. New EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis in clinical practice. 3rd Systemic Sclerosis World Congress. Abstract book. 2014. P. 6.

15. Andresson K, Saxne T, Bergknut C. Prevalence and incedence of systemic sclerosis in southern Sweden: population-based data with case ascertainment using the 1980 ACR criteria and the proposed ACR-EULAR classification criteria. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Oct;73(10):1788–92. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203618. Epub 2013 Jul 29.


Review

For citations:


Koneva O.A., Ovsyannikova O.B., Starovoitova M.N., Cheremukhina E.O., Aleksandrova E.N., Ananyeva L.P. ASSESSMENT OF THE SENSITIVITY OF NEW CRITERIA FOR SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS IN RUSSIAN PATIENT POPULATION. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2015;53(4):361-366. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2015-361-366

Views: 1253


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)