Quality of life of patients with Takayasu arteritis in the long-term after surgical treatment
https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2025-629-635
Abstract
Takayasu arteritis is a rare large vessel vasculitis affecting the aorta, its branches and the pulmonary artery. With a progressive course, the disease can lead to the development of stroke, ischemia of the upper extremities and a decrease in quality of life. There is a limited number of long-term results of treatment of Takayasu arteritis and there are no studies on assessing the quality of life in patients after surgery.
The aim of the study was to study the quality of life of patients with Takayasu arteritis who underwent surgery for damage to the branches of the aortic arch.
Materials and methods. The quality of life in the long-term period was assessed in 21 patients with Takayasu arteritis. They operated in the department of vascular surgery of A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery from January 2001 to December 2021. Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 (Short Form 36) questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Morisky – Green compliance scale and a specialized questionnaire developed as part of this study.
Results and discussion. When assessing the level of anxiety and depression on the HADS, it was revealed that 42,8% of operated patients with Takayasu arteritis have disorders in the psychoemotional sphere. The assessment of the quality of life by SF-36 scale demonstrates the absence of a statistically significant decrease in the quality of life of patients compared to the average indicators for the healthy population in the Russian population. Our data indicate that stroke before surgery has a statistically significant effect on the mental health of patients, a decrease in vital activity and leads to a significant decrease in social contacts of patients. At the same time, performing surgical intervention reduces the risk of developing stroke: the rate of freedom from neurological events in operated patients with damage to the branches of the aortic arch was 92.3±7.4%. Among the factors that statistically significantly reduce quality of life indicators are the development of restenosis and thrombosis of vascular grafts, multifocal type of damage to the aorta and its branches, and the presence of arterial hypertension.
Thus, patients with Takayasu arteritis require dynamic monitoring of the state of vascular reconstructions and correction of hypertension. When thrombosis and hemodynamically significant restenosis of grafts are detected, new vascular regions are involved, the issue of surgical treatment should be considered in order to restore blood flow in the affected area.
About the Authors
D. A. ArgunovaRussian Federation
Daria А. Argunova
117997, Moscow, Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya str., 27
Competing Interests:
none
V. A. Kulbak
Russian Federation
Vladimir А. Kulbak
117997, Moscow, Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya str., 27
Competing Interests:
none
References
1. Bokeria LA, Pokrovsky AV, Sokurenko GYu, Samorodskaya IV, Abugov SA, Alekyan BG, et al. National recommendations for the management of patients with brachiocephalic artery disease. Moscow;2013 (In Russ.).
2. Rhodes JM, Cherry KJ Jr, Clark RC, Panneton JM, Bower TC, Gloviczki P, et al. Aortic-origin reconstruction of the great vessels: Risk factors of early and late complications. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(2):260-269. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(00)90157-5
3. Ishikawa K. Diagnostic approach and proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of Takayasu’s arteriopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12(4):964-972. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90462-7
4. Sidawy A, Perler BС (eds). Rutherford’s vascular surgery and en dovascular therapy; 9th ed. Elsevier;2018.
5. Borodina IE, Khrustaleva NB, Shardina LA, Salavatova GG. The influence of comorbidity on the quality of life, the level of anxiety to therapy in patients suffering from nonspecific aortoarteritis. Ural Medical Journal. 2018; 158(3):109-114 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25694/URMJ.2018.03.022
6. Abularrage CJ, Slidell MB, Sidawy AN, Kreishman P, Amdur RL, Arora S. Quality of life of patients with Takayasu’s arteritis. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(1):131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.044
7. Alibaz-Oner F, Sreih AG, Merkel PA, Direskeneli H. Patientreported outcomes in Takayasu’s arteritis. La Presse Médicale. 2017;46(7-8):225-227. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2017.03.023
8. Omma A, Erer B, Karadag O, Yilmaz N, Alibaz-Oner F, Yildiz F, et al. Remarkable damage along with poor quality of life in Takayasu arteritis: Cross-sectional results of a long-term followed-up multicentre cohort. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35(Suppl 103(1)):77-82.
9. Misra DP, Rathore U, Patro P, Agarwal V, Sharma A. Patientreported outcome measures in Takayasu arteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8(3):1073-1093. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00355-3
10. Amirdjanova VN, Goryachev DV, Korshunov NI, Rebrov AP, Sorotskaya VN. SF-36 questionnaire population quality of life indices. Nauchno-Prakticheskaya Revmatologia = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2008;(1):36-48 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2008-852
11. Dos Santos AM, Misse RG, Borges IBP, Gualano B, de Souza AWS, Takayama L, et al. Increased modifiable cardio-vascular risk factors in patients with Takayasu arteritis: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Adv Rheumatol. 2021;61(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s42358-020-00157-1
12. Misra R, Danda D, Rajappa SM, Ghosh A, Gupta R, Mahendranath KM, et al.; Indian Rheumatology Vasculitis (IRAVAS) group. Development and initial validation of the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(10):1795-1801. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket128
13. Suppiah R, Mukhtyar C, Flossmann O, Alberici F, Baslund B, Batra R, et al. A cross-sectional study of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score version 3 in systemic vasculitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(5):899-905. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq400
14. Exley AR, Bacon PA, Luqmani RA, Kitas GD, Gordon C, Savage CO, et al. Development and initial validation of the Vasculitis Damage Index for the standardized clinical assessment of damage in the systemic vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(2):371-380. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400222
15. Hellmich B, Agueda A, Monti S, Buttgereit F, de Boysson H, Brouwer E, et al. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(1):19-30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672
16. Maz M, Chung SA, Abril A, Langford CA, Gorelik M, Guyatt G, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(8):1349-1365. doi: 10.1002/art.41774
17. Isobe M, Amano K, Arimura Y, Ishizu A, Ito S, Kaname S, et al. JCS 2017 guideline on management of vasculitis syndrome – digest version. Circ J. 2020;84(2):299-359. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0773
18. Nakaoka Y, Isobe M, Tanaka Y, Ishii T, Ooka S, Niiro H, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in refractory Takayasu arteritis: Final results of the randomized controlled phase 3 TAKT study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(9):2427-2434. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez630
19. Wang J, Kong X, Ma L, Ding Z, Chen H, Chen R, et al. Treatment efficacy and safety of adalimumab versus tocilizumab in patients with active and severe Takayasu arteritis: An open-label study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024;63(5):1359-1367. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead387
Review
For citations:
Argunova D.A., Kulbak V.A. Quality of life of patients with Takayasu arteritis in the long-term after surgical treatment. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2025;63(6):629-635. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2025-629-635
































